Joint Chiefs' #GenMilley recommended calling up neighboring National Guard units immediately (Army Sec. McCarthy doesn't get around to it until 2.5hrs after Capitol breached)
2. Especially egregious by DoD:
On left (book excerpt):
2:30pm meeting: Milley recommends "send out a call for National Guard reinforcements from the nearby states."
On right (Pentagon's timeline):
2:30pm meeting was about DC Guard.
4:18pm meeting about other states' Guards.
3. Here's another omission in DoD Timeline.
On left (book excerpt):
4:39pm call between Acting SecDef Miller and White House chief of staff Meadows (plus @LeaderMcConnell joins call and sounds furious)
On right (Pentagon's timeline):
Blank, nada, nothing to see here
4. Main point is these egregious omissions on their own.
Raises further questions:
Question: Does Army Secretary McCarthy finally get around to calling Maryland's @GovLarryHogan at 4:40pm only after 4:39pm call where McConnell sounds furious about DoD lack of action?
5. Further question raised by these omissions:
Is McConnell's request to DoD to clear the building incongruent with what DoD ultimately does, which is deploy the Guard only to the perimeter (and late in the day)?
6. Additional Q raised by these omissions:
What other communications between DoD and White House are omitted from the Pentagon's timeline?
Recall: Acting SecDef's chief of staff Kash Patel told a reporter: "I was talking to Meadows, nonstop that day.”
“There is also apparent confirmation that the Kremlin possesses kompromat, or potentially compromising material…collected-the document says–from Trump’s earlier ‘non-official visits to Russian Federation territory.’”
2. “There is a brief psychological assessment of Trump, who is described as an ‘impulsive, mentally unstable and unbalanced individual who suffers from an inferiority complex.’”
3. “Western intelligence agencies are understood to have been aware of the documents for some months and to have carefully examined them. The papers, seen by the Guardian, seem to represent a serious and highly unusual leak from within the Kremlin.”
"Had the Justice Department wanted to recognize that the Constitution’s due process clause applies to detainees held at Guantanamo, the brief would have essentially written itself."
Vance "sent a message that this is an exit ramp for Weisselberg that he should have taken already and, if he doesn't, everything he knows and loves in this world is fair game."
"Prosecutors don't directly threaten to charge a family member, but it's not uncommon that that implicit threat hangs out there .... It can't be lost on Allen Weisselberg ... ... that family members might ...come under investigation."
3. Weissmann details why he thinks (a) the content of the indictment, (b) the prosecutors' requests in the arraignment hearing, and (c) the press conference by defense attorneys points toward a criminal investigation with much more to come.
Russia’s influence operation was “in full swing during both the [2015-16] Republican and Democratic primary season that may have helped sink the hopes of candidates more hostile to Russian interests long before the field narrowed.”
3. The Intelligence Community assessment in 2017 and Mueller documents also pointed to Kremlin involvement at time GOP primary was in full swing.
Letter raises key issue: DoD's standard for assessing #CivCas is artificially high, and DoD report "appears to DEFY the congressional requirement" to use lower standard.
2. I wrote about the wrong-headedness of the Pentagon's standard for assessing civilian casualties in this @nytopinion piece in April 2018.
3. In June 2021, @annieshiel (@CivCenter) and @chrisjwoods (@airwars) wrote again about the DoD standard and how its use in reporting to Congress appears to (a) defy Congress' statutory requirements and (b) potentially vastly undercount civilian deaths.