Items in @CarolLeonnig @PhilipRucker book that Pentagon OMITTED in #Jan6 Timeline it released to public.

Joint Chiefs' #GenMilley recommended calling up neighboring National Guard units immediately (Army Sec. McCarthy doesn't get around to it until 2.5hrs after Capitol breached)
2. Especially egregious by DoD:

On left (book excerpt):

2:30pm meeting: Milley recommends "send out a call for National Guard reinforcements from the nearby states."

On right (Pentagon's timeline):

2:30pm meeting was about DC Guard.

4:18pm meeting about other states' Guards.
3. Here's another omission in DoD Timeline.

On left (book excerpt):

4:39pm call between Acting SecDef Miller and White House chief of staff Meadows (plus @LeaderMcConnell joins call and sounds furious)

On right (Pentagon's timeline):

Blank, nada, nothing to see here
4. Main point is these egregious omissions on their own.

Raises further questions:

Question: Does Army Secretary McCarthy finally get around to calling Maryland's @GovLarryHogan at 4:40pm only after 4:39pm call where McConnell sounds furious about DoD lack of action?
5. Further question raised by these omissions:

Is McConnell's request to DoD to clear the building incongruent with what DoD ultimately does, which is deploy the Guard only to the perimeter (and late in the day)?
6. Additional Q raised by these omissions:

What other communications between DoD and White House are omitted from the Pentagon's timeline?

Recall: Acting SecDef's chief of staff Kash Patel told a reporter: "I was talking to Meadows, nonstop that day.”

vanityfair.com/news/2021/01/e…
7/7. @CarolLeonnig and @PhilipRucker's book is released tomorrow (July 20).

Link to book excerpt:
washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/…

Link to book info:
penguinrandomhouse.com/books/673354/i…

<end>
Addendum: Other big item in @CarolLeonnig @PhilipRucker book that DoD's Timeline omits:

Around 4pm Pence's urgent "order" to Miller to have Guard clear Capitol.

We already learned of that from AP.👇

Book has new details. And important to note omission.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ryan Goodman

Ryan Goodman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rgoodlaw

15 Jul
Apparent Kremlin documents leak.

“There is also apparent confirmation that the Kremlin possesses kompromat, or potentially compromising material…collected-the document says–from Trump’s earlier ‘non-official visits to Russian Federation territory.’”

theguardian.com/world/2021/jul…
2. “There is a brief psychological assessment of Trump, who is described as an ‘impulsive, mentally unstable and unbalanced individual who suffers from an inferiority complex.’”
3. “Western intelligence agencies are understood to have been aware of the documents for some months and to have carefully examined them. The papers, seen by the Guardian, seem to represent a serious and highly unusual leak from within the Kremlin.”
Read 5 tweets
12 Jul
<thread>

In a brief to DC Circuit, Biden admin had a choice to make: Whether to recognize due process rights apply to detainees at #Guantanamo.

The answer:

Defense Dept:✅
State Dept:✅
Intelligence agencies:✅

Justice Dept:❌

@charlie_savage reports:
nytimes.com/2021/07/09/us/…
2. I just published this analysis

"Had the Justice Department wanted to recognize that the Constitution’s due process clause applies to detainees held at Guantanamo, the brief would have essentially written itself."

The Supreme Court has already spoken.
justsecurity.org/77386/what-the…
3. My analysis is largely doctrinal but I do make a couple policy points:

The Justice Department's position undercuts @JoeBiden and @SecDef's stated goal of closing the prison.

@SenatorDurbin, Chair of Senate Judiciary, letter to Justice Department pointed this out. 👇
Read 6 tweets
9 Jul
<thread>

@KaraScannell @eorden interviewed attorneys about #Weisselberg.

Very consistent with @AWeissmann_'s analysis @just_security

— pressures Weisselberg to flip to protect his family
— signals to potential cooperators
— indicting org now makes sense
cnn.com/2021/07/09/pol…
2. Former U.S. tax prosecutor @AGOSTINOLAW:

Vance "sent a message that this is an exit ramp for Weisselberg that he should have taken already and, if he doesn't, everything he knows and loves in this world is fair game."
3. Criminal defense attorney @brianeklein:

"Prosecutors don't directly threaten to charge a family member, but it's not uncommon that that implicit threat hangs out there .... It can't be lost on Allen Weisselberg ... ... that family members might ...come under investigation."
Read 4 tweets
9 Jul
<thread>

After first waves of commentary on #Weisselberg indictment, I sat down with @AWeissmann_.

Several important insights by him:

1. Prosecutors have another option to obtain Weisselberg testimony if he does not cooperate.

justsecurity.org/77369/how-to-r…
2. Weissmann: "After Weisselberg is prosecuted...the prosecution can put him in the grand jury and compel him to testify."

That option is also discussed in #SistersInLaw podcast (@KimberlyEAtkins @JillWineBanks @JoyceWhiteVance @BarbMcQuade)

politicon.com/podcasts/trump…
3. Weissmann details why he thinks (a) the content of the indictment, (b) the prosecutors' requests in the arraignment hearing, and (c) the press conference by defense attorneys points toward a criminal investigation with much more to come.
Read 7 tweets
6 Jul
Been warning Kremlin bad news for Republicans too. Including interference in 2016 primary.

Now this: “Russian government hackers breached the computer systems of the Republican National Committee last week”

@WilliamTurton⁩ ⁦@JenniferJJacobsbloomberg.com/news/articles/…
2. @selectedwisdom Senate testimony in 2017:

Russia’s influence operation was “in full swing during both the [2015-16] Republican and Democratic primary season that may have helped sink the hopes of candidates more hostile to Russian interests long before the field narrowed.”
3. The Intelligence Community assessment in 2017 and Mueller documents also pointed to Kremlin involvement at time GOP primary was in full swing.
Read 4 tweets
6 Jul
In letter to @SecDef, @SenWarren and @RepRoKhanna ask for review of civilian casualties from U.S. operations.

Letter raises key issue: DoD's standard for assessing #CivCas is artificially high, and DoD report "appears to DEFY the congressional requirement" to use lower standard.
2. I wrote about the wrong-headedness of the Pentagon's standard for assessing civilian casualties in this @nytopinion piece in April 2018.

nytimes.com/2018/04/26/opi…
3. In June 2021, @annieshiel (@CivCenter) and @chrisjwoods (@airwars) wrote again about the DoD standard and how its use in reporting to Congress appears to (a) defy Congress' statutory requirements and (b) potentially vastly undercount civilian deaths.

justsecurity.org/76788/a-legacy…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(