✨Indra and Ahilya ✨

I'm going to cover the Vedic perspective+ I will cover historical aspect also. Image
This story comes in Valmiki Ramayana,Devi Bhagvatam ,BrahmVaivarta that "Indra made physical relations with Devi ahilya(wife of महर्षि गौतम) . Hence Indra is called जार(lover, destroyer) of अहिल्या. ImageImageImage
Indra is called the जार of ahalya in these sections of Vedas:-
अहल्यायै जारेति। अहल्याया ह मैत्रेय्या जार आस {ShādVimsa Brahmana 1.1}
अहल्यायै जारेति {Shatpath 3.3.4.18}
Kumaril Bhatt in his commentary of mimansa sutra 1.3.7 has written:-
अहर्लीयते यस्यां सा( Ahilya is the "night") and Indra means the sun, it comes from the root इदिँ परमैश्वर्ये{DP 1.65}
इन्द्र is the जार of अहिल्या means Sun destroys the night. Image
Shatpath brahmāna 4.5.9.4 calls सूर्य 🌞 as Indra. Image
In Nirukta{3.16, 3.3.4) सूर्य is clearly called the जार of रात्रि. You might be wandering what is the meaning of गौतम then? "उत्तमा गावो रश्मयो यस्य स:" That which has Excellent rays is Gautam. Here "चंद्रमा 🌝 moon is Gautama".
{See the image right रश्मि means गो} ImageImage
So the meaning that has to be taken as "Son(Indra) is the Jaar(destroyer) of the Ahilya (night) { The wife on Chandra}.

Now come to the historical aspect. Ahilya is the manas Daughter of Brahma ji,Indra a Deva. Both do not fall under the rules of human beings. Image
Whatever Indra did he did it for the well being of the Devas. See the image below from the बालकांड of Ramayana.

The Gautama had destroyed the Forest Dandakaranya the Devas were afraid. Just to make him angry(and to take the Curse). Anger+Curse destroys the Tapa. Indra did such Image
Devi Ahilya knew he was Indra. She did it even after knowing he was Indra.{Balkanda 1.48.19-20}
She is calling him as सुरश्रेष्ठ means she knew He was Indra. The verse 19 is more clear. Image
Indra did many works by making him as Victim.
{i} Completed the work of the Devas {ended the tapa of Gautama}
(ii) Settled the Kamnas of Devi Ahilya after which she got cursed and at the end she met Bhagvan Rama. Image
Remember Devas are not free from कर्मफल. Indra does the karmas for लोकसंग्रह, In this incident he got cursed by maharshi Gautama. In other incident He got cursed for killing वृत्र. Image
Swananad Gajanana has described it in other way through व्युत्पत्ति.
अहिल्या as earth, गौतम as गोविज्ञान of कृषि, Indra as king.
Read the doc here
docs.google.com/document/d/1_X…
The thread about Brahma and Ma Saraswati
*Chandogya Upanishad , subtitle has slight misspelling
@rattibha unroll 😉

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with VedaEchoes

VedaEchoes Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @vedaechoesji

21 Jul
How many rounds(भांवर) are right during marriages? 4 or 7

In Gujrat we have 4 rounds. 7 rounds are quite popular in UP,Himanchal,bihar and many other states✨ Image
Does the concept of tradition applies here?

Shastras too falls under tradition. A tradition which does not go against श्रुति-स्मृति is considered right others are wrong.
+
A tradition that does not mentioned in shruti smritis(as मंगलसूत्र) is right because it contradicts none.
पारस्कर ग्रह्यसूत्र of the shukla yajurveda which is very famous among pandits states:-
चतुर्थं शूर्पकुष्ठया सर्वाल्लाजानावपति भगाय स्वाहेति ।
4th time all the लाजा's{Kheels} should be sacrificed in fire then they do the last parikrama as said in 7th sutra Image
Read 10 tweets
18 Jul
✨Slavery in Vedas✨

There are random articles on the internet which interprets the term दास, दासी as Slaves or "female Slaves". They try to prove this similar to the western slavery. Lets have a look at their claims:-,
Yesterday,Someone DMed this to me. I wasn't able to find the original source.

I looked at all the similar claims and I found out that all the articles have imagined "slavery" and injustice just by the word Dasā and provided nothing to substantiate their claims.
Be it the references from the rigveda samhita or the brahman of the samhita( ऐतरेय) They just mention the term दास or दासी. They do not mention what is done to them,what are their Works.
It can't be called slavery. It is "servitude"
Read 15 tweets
17 Jul
A discussion on the term "वर्णसंङ्कर" (Gita 1.41-1.43)
What does this term means?
Children born out of the "Intercaste marriages" or Children born out of the "adultery"? Or something else
Q:- Does the term Varnasankar only means "the result of Intercaste marriage?
A:- The term mainly means such. The other meanings denotes the son born out of "सगोत्र विवाह, व्याभिचार" as varnasankar.

The broken यज्ञोपवीत tradition also result into Varnasankarta.
Q:- What is the pramana for this?
A:- Manusmriti 10.24 describes the same thing. But they are the वर्णसंकरता by प्रकारांतर the main वर्णसंकरता lies in result of Intercaste marriage.

{Note:- the term does not means first*}
Read 10 tweets
17 Jul
Very wrong‼️Modern Hindus must restart the philosophy of Ved Nindak Charvakas. Charvaka Darshan accepts only "प्रत्यक्ष "

Mimansa accepts 5-6, Vedanta accepts 4-6. Nyaya accepts 4 Pramanas. All Darshanas accept Shabda pramana.
तस्माच्छास्त्रं प्रमाणं ते (BG 16.24)
The truth does not lie under pratyaksha pramana it is beyond all 6 pramanas It is called अप्रमेय.
प्रत्यक्ष in nyaya means the connection of Senses with the object. Experience is not pratyaksha...
Simple question how do you know "shri krishna said that in shrimadbhagvadgita"

Itihasa can't be प्रत्यक्ष, anumana can't work here. You are accepting शब्द प्रमाण and then rejecting it on your books. Very nice
Read 6 tweets
15 Jul
Whatever I'm going to write further, Use it in the case of this mantra only. Don't try to use it everywhere..

This verse exist in the famous Indra- Indrani samvad suktam or Vrishakapi suktam. People show the commentary of Sripad Damodar Satavlekar (available on govt website) Image
At first how can someone take the Injuction such as "Killing a cow" from the words "they cook bulls". Are they same animals? no. Do they have same value for us? no, cow is definitely supreme..

No logic,no proof, no context".
Acharya sayana has used the word "वृषभ" in his commentary, because it's a sanskrit term we can find interpretations with valid meaning. But Satavlekar ji has directly used "बैल" in his commentary. Image
Read 23 tweets
14 Jul
Recently the Government of Uttar Pradesh has passed the population control Bill and many governments are planning to do it in future.
Here is a short analysis of the policies ( Taken from my instagram post)
I have seen guys celebrating because the population of "Muzlims" will decrease they care nothing about their own population and families.
SP Minister said :- "No matter how many laws you make,one who has to take birth will take birth"
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(