I'm going to cover the Vedic perspective+ I will cover historical aspect also.
This story comes in Valmiki Ramayana,Devi Bhagvatam ,BrahmVaivarta that "Indra made physical relations with Devi ahilya(wife of महर्षि गौतम) . Hence Indra is called जार(lover, destroyer) of अहिल्या.
Indra is called the जार of ahalya in these sections of Vedas:-
अहल्यायै जारेति। अहल्याया ह मैत्रेय्या जार आस {ShādVimsa Brahmana 1.1}
अहल्यायै जारेति {Shatpath 3.3.4.18}
Kumaril Bhatt in his commentary of mimansa sutra 1.3.7 has written:-
अहर्लीयते यस्यां सा( Ahilya is the "night") and Indra means the sun, it comes from the root इदिँ परमैश्वर्ये{DP 1.65}
इन्द्र is the जार of अहिल्या means Sun destroys the night.
Shatpath brahmāna 4.5.9.4 calls सूर्य 🌞 as Indra.
In Nirukta{3.16, 3.3.4) सूर्य is clearly called the जार of रात्रि. You might be wandering what is the meaning of गौतम then? "उत्तमा गावो रश्मयो यस्य स:" That which has Excellent rays is Gautam. Here "चंद्रमा 🌝 moon is Gautama".
{See the image right रश्मि means गो}
So the meaning that has to be taken as "Son(Indra) is the Jaar(destroyer) of the Ahilya (night) { The wife on Chandra}.
Now come to the historical aspect. Ahilya is the manas Daughter of Brahma ji,Indra a Deva. Both do not fall under the rules of human beings.
Whatever Indra did he did it for the well being of the Devas. See the image below from the बालकांड of Ramayana.
The Gautama had destroyed the Forest Dandakaranya the Devas were afraid. Just to make him angry(and to take the Curse). Anger+Curse destroys the Tapa. Indra did such
Devi Ahilya knew he was Indra. She did it even after knowing he was Indra.{Balkanda 1.48.19-20}
She is calling him as सुरश्रेष्ठ means she knew He was Indra. The verse 19 is more clear.
Indra did many works by making him as Victim.
{i} Completed the work of the Devas {ended the tapa of Gautama}
(ii) Settled the Kamnas of Devi Ahilya after which she got cursed and at the end she met Bhagvan Rama.
Remember Devas are not free from कर्मफल. Indra does the karmas for लोकसंग्रह, In this incident he got cursed by maharshi Gautama. In other incident He got cursed for killing वृत्र.
Swananad Gajanana has described it in other way through व्युत्पत्ति.
अहिल्या as earth, गौतम as गोविज्ञान of कृषि, Indra as king.
Read the doc here docs.google.com/document/d/1_X…
How many rounds(भांवर) are right during marriages? 4 or 7
In Gujrat we have 4 rounds. 7 rounds are quite popular in UP,Himanchal,bihar and many other states✨
Does the concept of tradition applies here?
Shastras too falls under tradition. A tradition which does not go against श्रुति-स्मृति is considered right others are wrong.
+
A tradition that does not mentioned in shruti smritis(as मंगलसूत्र) is right because it contradicts none.
पारस्कर ग्रह्यसूत्र of the shukla yajurveda which is very famous among pandits states:-
चतुर्थं शूर्पकुष्ठया सर्वाल्लाजानावपति भगाय स्वाहेति ।
4th time all the लाजा's{Kheels} should be sacrificed in fire then they do the last parikrama as said in 7th sutra
There are random articles on the internet which interprets the term दास, दासी as Slaves or "female Slaves". They try to prove this similar to the western slavery. Lets have a look at their claims:-,
Yesterday,Someone DMed this to me. I wasn't able to find the original source.
I looked at all the similar claims and I found out that all the articles have imagined "slavery" and injustice just by the word Dasā and provided nothing to substantiate their claims.
Be it the references from the rigveda samhita or the brahman of the samhita( ऐतरेय) They just mention the term दास or दासी. They do not mention what is done to them,what are their Works.
It can't be called slavery. It is "servitude"
A discussion on the term "वर्णसंङ्कर" (Gita 1.41-1.43)
What does this term means?
Children born out of the "Intercaste marriages" or Children born out of the "adultery"? Or something else
Q:- Does the term Varnasankar only means "the result of Intercaste marriage?
A:- The term mainly means such. The other meanings denotes the son born out of "सगोत्र विवाह, व्याभिचार" as varnasankar.
The broken यज्ञोपवीत tradition also result into Varnasankarta.
Q:- What is the pramana for this?
A:- Manusmriti 10.24 describes the same thing. But they are the वर्णसंकरता by प्रकारांतर the main वर्णसंकरता lies in result of Intercaste marriage.
The truth does not lie under pratyaksha pramana it is beyond all 6 pramanas It is called अप्रमेय.
प्रत्यक्ष in nyaya means the connection of Senses with the object. Experience is not pratyaksha...
Simple question how do you know "shri krishna said that in shrimadbhagvadgita"
Itihasa can't be प्रत्यक्ष, anumana can't work here. You are accepting शब्द प्रमाण and then rejecting it on your books. Very nice
Whatever I'm going to write further, Use it in the case of this mantra only. Don't try to use it everywhere..
This verse exist in the famous Indra- Indrani samvad suktam or Vrishakapi suktam. People show the commentary of Sripad Damodar Satavlekar (available on govt website)
At first how can someone take the Injuction such as "Killing a cow" from the words "they cook bulls". Are they same animals? no. Do they have same value for us? no, cow is definitely supreme..
No logic,no proof, no context".
Acharya sayana has used the word "वृषभ" in his commentary, because it's a sanskrit term we can find interpretations with valid meaning. But Satavlekar ji has directly used "बैल" in his commentary.
Recently the Government of Uttar Pradesh has passed the population control Bill and many governments are planning to do it in future.
Here is a short analysis of the policies ( Taken from my instagram post)
I have seen guys celebrating because the population of "Muzlims" will decrease they care nothing about their own population and families.
SP Minister said :- "No matter how many laws you make,one who has to take birth will take birth"