[00:11:10] "what I believe is a flaw in the drug safety system. I published this flaw. And, uh, the flaw basically amounts to the mice that are often used for things like drug safety testing and other experiments having been
"accidentally evolutionarily modified by the breeding protocol that is used to produce them so that their telomeres which are these, um, repetitive sequences at the ends of chromosomes have been elongated tremendously and has, uh, has potentially very large impacts.
"Effectively, these animals have a capacity to repair their tissues so that if you poison them, but you don't outright kill them, they actually have an extremely good capacity to fix themselves whereas we have a limited capacity, so they're-they're bad models.
...you and I have a kind of uneasy relationship when we opened the medicine cabinet because we know that virtually every drug in there was tested against mice that are very, very capable of dealing with toxicity, and so we don't know."
RESPONSE:
No evidence to support said flaw in the drug testing system. Telomere length has no documented effect on how well mice can tolerate toxic insults.
Moreover, drugs must be tested in SEVERAL animal species for safety before being allowed to be tested in humans.
After safety is confirmed in animal species, the drugs are then tested in healthy humans to make sure they are safe before any efficacy testing is done in Phases 2 and 3.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
No, there is no evidence that the spike protein alone is "very dangerous and cytotoxic" in concentrations even orders of magnitude higher than what is ever observed in vaccinated people.
[00:17:30] the fact that the drug in question, Ivermectin, comes from, uh, soil bacteria, it's not a completely synthetic molecule, means that that it is likely to be similar to the things that one's ancestors have encountered before,
and there's, therefore, a good chance that the body has a reasonably elegant way of dealing with it rather than uh, using some mechanism that's-that's not so great."
There is no evidence that a molecule extracted from soil bacteria has any safety of efficacy advantage. There are plenty of counterexamples of toxic molecules found in soil bacteria:
[01:17:01] Heather: And when you actually read the paper, you find that there are tiny effects, maybe, but it's in combination with this other drug, Verapamil, in which fertility meiotic effects become an issue. So that's cheating.
they have zero hope in hell of evaluating all of the potential falsehoods in Bret’s podcasts.
I mean, I alone submitted 23 claims before they told me about the 3 per person limit.
What a shitshow.
In the meantime, somebody is offering their own $10K to do this right (see attached).
Personally, I couldn’t care less about the stupid Amazon gift cards, and I would have pointed out the very same errors if @alexandrosM would have asked me to do it.
[00:11:10] what I believe is a flaw in the drug safety system. I published this flaw. And, uh, the flaw basically amounts to the mice that are often used for things like drug safety testing and other experiments having been
accidentally evolutionarily modified by the breeding protocol that is used to produce them so that their telomeres which are these, um, repetitive sequences at the ends of chromosomes have been elongated tremendously and has, uh, has potentially very large impacts.
Effectively, these animals have a capacity to repair their tissues so that if you poison them, but you don't outright kill them, they actually have an extremely good capacity to fix themselves whereas we have a limited capacity, so they're-they're bad models.
Ok @alexandrosM, I've submitted 4 false and 6 unsupported claims stemming from just the "How to save the world" podcast. When can I expect $700 in Amazon gift cards?