There are certain "rumours" (published, but at this point no more than that) that China may be about to admit that covid-19 leaked from a lab in Wuhan (not yet clearly which, there are three candidates in Wuhan) and throw under the bus certain Chinese and do doubt also
American scientists. One thing that suggests that this may be true is the surprising recent volte-face by WHO's Tedros, who although generally regarded as a China stooge, has suddenly started requesting China's cooperation in uncovering the virus's origins (even though China and
the rest of its stooges have continue to claim that it was zoonosis).
If China did decide on this turnaround, there would be only one precedent for this I can recall, it was the 2002 admission by Kim Jong-il that North Korea had indeed kidnapped Japanese citizens but "only 13"
(the number is known to be very much larger), without the knowledge of the leadership and all those guilty had already been "severely punished". China could try to do something similar, but there are problems. First of all, there are the likely demands for compensation which
China is determined not to accept. For that reason if China does make an admission is is sure to try to shift the main blame on American scientists who originated the gain of function research on bat coronaviruses - especially Peter Dashak. Which would be poetic justice of sorts.
The second problem is that North Korea's admission did not actually work as intended - the Japanese did not stop demanding the release of the remaining kidnapped and/or detailed and trustworthy information what happened to them - something that the North Korean regime cannot
provide by its very nature.
So overall I think this news is still very unlikely but it it did turn out to be correct, at least many people would receive their just deserts (if only partially).
For what it’s worth:

tgcom24.mediaset.it/mondo/coronavi…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrzej Kozlowski

Andrzej Kozlowski Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @akoz33

21 Jul
These days I spend so much time listening two great Russian intellectual figures, perhaps the greatest that experienced a much of Russia’s Soviet and post-Soviet history that I have almost no time for current politics. These two are the Edvard Radzinsky and Vyacheslav
Vsevolodovich Ivanov (the linguist, not the symbolist poet, who was his distant relative). And although their personalities, styles and areas of interest were different (with literature & poetry the main overlap), their views are very complimentary and even one may say, different
expressions of the same basic outlook. I already translated a fragment of Posner’s interview with Radzinsky here:
Read 17 tweets
19 Jul
So here is another translation of a fragment of an interview with Edvard Radzinsky, this time on BBC Russian service, around 2015.
And in it he explains why he originally decided not to become a historian, in spite of graduating with distinction from Moscow’s very
prestigious Historico-Archival Institute & then why in 1990 he returned to history abandoning his life as Russia’s most famous playwright, a life that he greatly enjoyed. (In terms of number of translations and performances abroad he remains Russia’s second most successful
playwright ever - after Chekhov.)
This should be of interest to everyone interested not just in Russian history but in the profession of the historian itself and in part I it shows why this profession is an entirely different thing in Russia and in the West. The fact that many
Read 19 tweets
18 Jul
Radzinsky on the correspondence between Poland’s King Stephen Bathory and Ivan IV “The Terrible” (actually known as “The Tormentor” in the years following his rule) during the Livonian War.
“Difficult peace negotiations began. Batory demanded not only Livonia, but also Russian cities. The warring parties exchanged sarcastic letters.
Ivan informed Bathory that he, a natural Sovereign, received his throne as an inheritance from his forefathers, by the will of God, and not "by the consent of a multitude of rebellious crowds."
Read 6 tweets
18 Jul
Yesterday I read (via Skype) for my 5 year old grandson, Stanisław Lem’s story “Trurl’s machine”. It’s from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cyber… . The story is about how the constructor Trurl (one of the two heroes of these stories, the other being his friend,
Klapaucius) by accident constructed an enormous electronic thinking machine that turned out to be an electronic idiot. It possessed the three qualities of an idiot: it could not do arithmetic, it was very stubborn & insisted in the correctness of its
wrong answers(it thought that 2+2=7) and it was easily offended and ready to impose its (wrong) views by force. Having been repeatedly insulted by Trurl because of its stupidity, it rebelled and tried to crush the two constructors with its bulk. It managed to chase them into a
Read 9 tweets
17 Jul
In 1901 Russia’s Holy Synod excommunicates Count Lev Tolstoy for his “anti-Christian” and anti-church teachings. In the same year the first Nobel Prize innLiterature is awarded. Contrary to general expectation it was not awarded to Tolstoy but to the French poet Sully Prudhomm. ImageImageImage
“A very good poet, novelist and philosopher, now somewhat forgotten. You should read him” - says Edvard Radzinsky.
Many writers, including August Strinberg and Henrik Ibsen protested. The prize was brand new and it was then taken seriously.
Radzinsky continues his talk about the year 1901:
“In Moscow Arts Theatre they first staged ‘Three Sisters”’. But do you know what thus play is about? In reality. No, of course, it’s true that there are three sisters, they recall the past etc…but no. No. It is a story about
Read 5 tweets
16 Jul
Below in this thread is my translation of a fragment of an interview with Edvard Radzinsky conducted by Andrij Pelchevski, a Ukrainian TV presenter, entrepreneur and politician (leader of a political party). The title of the interview is “From Dictatorship to Revolution”.
This fragment concerns Boris Yeltsin, and Radzinsky’s encounter with him. Earlier Radzinsky explained how he was studying Nicholas II’s diaries still deep in Soviet days, in the museum of the October revolution.
He said that the young woman who was working there and who brought him the diaries could not understand why he needed them. In order to be allowed to see the diary he wrote an application, in which he wrote that he was writing about
Read 28 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(