These days I spend so much time listening two great Russian intellectual figures, perhaps the greatest that experienced a much of Russia’s Soviet and post-Soviet history that I have almost no time for current politics. These two are the Edvard Radzinsky and Vyacheslav
Vsevolodovich Ivanov (the linguist, not the symbolist poet, who was his distant relative). And although their personalities, styles and areas of interest were different (with literature & poetry the main overlap), their views are very complimentary and even one may say, different
expressions of the same basic outlook. I already translated a fragment of Posner’s interview with Radzinsky here:
So now in the turn of an interview with Ivanov conducted by Leonid Velekhov, in which he talks about genius, Kapitsa, Einstein and God.
Ivanov: Additionally I think that a very important side of genius is the ability to solve problems which to other people seem simply unbelievable. Kapitsa told me, my father was a great friend of the older Kapitsa, Pyotr Leonidovich, the Nobel prize laureate,
and as a consequence I also became his friend, in spite of the great difference in our age.
He told me about one dispute he had with Einstein.
At that time Kapitsa was making his first interesting experiments with Rutherford, he was in England and his stay there was suddenly broken by Stalin, who did not let him return to England.
But while he was still in England, Einstein invited him and tried to convince him to make experiments involving using magnets problems of super high energy, roughly the ball lightning problem ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ball_ligh… ), which at that time was not understood.
Kapitsa, being a great experimenter, argued with the great theoretician, saying that this thing is unrealisable, but Einstein insisted. Then Kapitsa asked: and who told you that such a thing is possible?
To which Einstein answered: “God”. And near the end of his life Kapitsa, at the time when he was in disgrace and had to continue his experiments in his garage.
After his letter to Stalin against Beria, they separated him from all his projects, but he remained an experimental physicist in his garage. And then he realised all these experiments and they turned out possible.
This is very interesting that there is…, here the important thing is not the interpretation of this word “God” but the fact that some insurmountable obstacle that exists for other people can be surmounted.
Velekhov: And did Pyotr Leonid Kapitsa arrive at a belief in God?
Ivanov: You know, yes. He spoke very interestingly about this:
he said that he arrived at the conclusion that all these laws of nature that he has studied, follow a certain overall principle.
That is, he did not speak about anything anthropomorphic but about the existence of some sort of plan, some scheme behind all of it, and he told me that in his experience many great physicists,
he mentioned Academician Leontovich (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_L… ), with whom he discussed this, when they when they were both in their eighties, they arrived at the conclusion that physics leads them to this idea of an overall plan.
Velekhov: Remarkable. I remember how his son said of himself as “I am an Orthodox atheist”.
Ivanov: laughs
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There are certain "rumours" (published, but at this point no more than that) that China may be about to admit that covid-19 leaked from a lab in Wuhan (not yet clearly which, there are three candidates in Wuhan) and throw under the bus certain Chinese and do doubt also
American scientists. One thing that suggests that this may be true is the surprising recent volte-face by WHO's Tedros, who although generally regarded as a China stooge, has suddenly started requesting China's cooperation in uncovering the virus's origins (even though China and
the rest of its stooges have continue to claim that it was zoonosis).
If China did decide on this turnaround, there would be only one precedent for this I can recall, it was the 2002 admission by Kim Jong-il that North Korea had indeed kidnapped Japanese citizens but "only 13"
So here is another translation of a fragment of an interview with Edvard Radzinsky, this time on BBC Russian service, around 2015.
And in it he explains why he originally decided not to become a historian, in spite of graduating with distinction from Moscow’s very
prestigious Historico-Archival Institute & then why in 1990 he returned to history abandoning his life as Russia’s most famous playwright, a life that he greatly enjoyed. (In terms of number of translations and performances abroad he remains Russia’s second most successful
playwright ever - after Chekhov.)
This should be of interest to everyone interested not just in Russian history but in the profession of the historian itself and in part I it shows why this profession is an entirely different thing in Russia and in the West. The fact that many
Radzinsky on the correspondence between Poland’s King Stephen Bathory and Ivan IV “The Terrible” (actually known as “The Tormentor” in the years following his rule) during the Livonian War.
“Difficult peace negotiations began. Batory demanded not only Livonia, but also Russian cities. The warring parties exchanged sarcastic letters.
Ivan informed Bathory that he, a natural Sovereign, received his throne as an inheritance from his forefathers, by the will of God, and not "by the consent of a multitude of rebellious crowds."
Yesterday I read (via Skype) for my 5 year old grandson, Stanisław Lem’s story “Trurl’s machine”. It’s from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cyber… . The story is about how the constructor Trurl (one of the two heroes of these stories, the other being his friend,
Klapaucius) by accident constructed an enormous electronic thinking machine that turned out to be an electronic idiot. It possessed the three qualities of an idiot: it could not do arithmetic, it was very stubborn & insisted in the correctness of its
wrong answers(it thought that 2+2=7) and it was easily offended and ready to impose its (wrong) views by force. Having been repeatedly insulted by Trurl because of its stupidity, it rebelled and tried to crush the two constructors with its bulk. It managed to chase them into a
In 1901 Russia’s Holy Synod excommunicates Count Lev Tolstoy for his “anti-Christian” and anti-church teachings. In the same year the first Nobel Prize innLiterature is awarded. Contrary to general expectation it was not awarded to Tolstoy but to the French poet Sully Prudhomm.
“A very good poet, novelist and philosopher, now somewhat forgotten. You should read him” - says Edvard Radzinsky.
Many writers, including August Strinberg and Henrik Ibsen protested. The prize was brand new and it was then taken seriously.
Radzinsky continues his talk about the year 1901:
“In Moscow Arts Theatre they first staged ‘Three Sisters”’. But do you know what thus play is about? In reality. No, of course, it’s true that there are three sisters, they recall the past etc…but no. No. It is a story about
Below in this thread is my translation of a fragment of an interview with Edvard Radzinsky conducted by Andrij Pelchevski, a Ukrainian TV presenter, entrepreneur and politician (leader of a political party). The title of the interview is “From Dictatorship to Revolution”.
This fragment concerns Boris Yeltsin, and Radzinsky’s encounter with him. Earlier Radzinsky explained how he was studying Nicholas II’s diaries still deep in Soviet days, in the museum of the October revolution.
He said that the young woman who was working there and who brought him the diaries could not understand why he needed them. In order to be allowed to see the diary he wrote an application, in which he wrote that he was writing about