Very heated exchange on gain-of-function and #OriginsOfCovid between Rand Paul and Tony Fauci ~50min into today's hearing "The Path Forward: A Federal Perspective on the COVID-19 Response"
An old thread by me that explains why Paul and Fauci are talking past each other on this point of whether NIH funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan:
This is a more recent thread again by me on how the federal definition of GOFROC leaves a lot of wiggle room for interpretation and why, even among scientists, it can be very difficult to agree on what is GOF using the federal definitions.
So far we've seen several episodes of politicians & Fox News journalists asking NIH/Fauci if the US is responsible for the pandemic because of funding gain-of-function research.
IMO these have not been productive in terms of reaching a better understanding of the #OriginsOfCovid
It would be more productive to have these discussions about whether US shares responsibility for a potential lab leak in China in a different format and using shared terminology/definitions.
These discussions would ideally be international to avoid spiraling into US politics.
It is necessary to acknowledge that risky pathogen research (GOF or not) is conducted in and funded by numerous countries worldwide.
A solution to possible lab-based outbreaks in the future must be a global solution, not a US or China solution.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Like Eban says, it's one of these stories where you feel like you can't even make this stuff up. peterattiamd.com/katherineeban2/
@KatherineEban@VanityFair@PeterAttiaMD There's a good discussion in the podcast about the difficulty of finding out who are the few people who know the origin of the virus (have evidence of it) and why finding a whistleblower may take decades or maybe even never. Related story:
I agree with @KatherineEban that the most credible sources on the #OriginsOfCovid are those that are asking for a proper investigation of plausible hypotheses, not the people on either side who insist that the virus is almost certainly natural or almost certainly from a lab.
New information or clarifications relevant to the #OriginsOfCovid continue to come to light on a regular basis.
In the short time between when I spoke with @NPR@FoodieScience and today, @washingtonpost published their discovery that China @who report suffered editing errors…
Unfortunately one of the known errors impacts the map of early covid cases in Dec 2019- this data is inconsistent with what was reported in Wuhan and yet underlies the first figure of the critical review by Holmes et al.
Some powerful scientists indeed unfairly rejected the notion that SARS2 came from a lab as a conspiracy theory. And internet sleuths did uncover damning info pointing to a possible lab origin of SARS2. usrtk.org/biohazards-blo…
This is not a good look for scientists and I reject that scientists as a whole are judged based on these Lancet letters.
A very insightful piece on vaccine hesitancy:
"most vaccine skepticism, if by that we mean reluctance, is not based on conspiracy theorizing — it’s based on risk-benefit calculations" nationalreview.com/2021/07/convin…
"People find acts of God easier to accept than mistakes of their own volition. So they may find it easier to accept the risks of facing COVID in nature, which they did not choose to get, than the unknown risks of a vaccine that they did consciously choose to take."
I think one major public health/sci comm mistake was emphasizing sterilizing immunity: vaccination = Never getting infected and Never transmitting virus to others.
When the point of being vaccinated = not developing severe covid, reaching herd immunity. globalnews.ca/news/8003930/i…
I know some well educated people who insist on staying unvaccinated. Due to how they were raised or where they grew up, they would rather take their chances with covid-19 (the delta and other new variants) than take a vaccine that has been administered to 100s millions of people.
The problem is that healthcare workers and the vulnerable people in society are now “putting themselves in harm’s way for people who’ve chosen not to protect themselves”
“Some health-care workers are starting to resent their patients—an emotion that feels taboo.”