This week's must listen: @patrick_oshag & Stephen Mandel
"The most important thing is to get into a organization, public markets, private markets, doesn't matter, where they are mentored by people who teach them really good fundamentals. A lot of that is sort of by osmosis."
"We have invested pretty much forever behind change. It can be technological change, managerial change, regulatory change, something that is changing the dynamic for a multi-year period. Investing behind those big areas has generally been what we've done on the long side."
"On the short side, it changed a lot. At the beginning there weren't a lot of hedge funds. The competition on the short side was much, much less than it is now. When there's incremental capital playing on the short side, that does change the supply-demand dynamic."
"Tthings we did in the late '90s and early 2000s shorting in the internet and telecom bubble, we absolutely couldn't do today. There was no problem borrowing Pets.com, eToys, all these crazy things. Today, the borrow cost shoots up to ridiculous levels immediately"
Shorting Onsale.com
"In the third quarter of '98, they reported earnings. Again, same thing, burning cash, no sign of this business is actually going to create any value. The stock was $12 and we were short 50bps. Six weeks later, on no news, the stock was 108."
Books-A-Million. $5->$39
"They announced that day, before the open, that they were going to have a website to sell books."
"$AMC and $GME and all this going on now, we've seen this before."
Analysts:
"if they're very linear thinkers, it will never work. We are always dealing in shades of gray. If somebody has to know the answer...Those people can be incredibly smart...but they can't work in our world. Our world is all about probabilities and weighing outcomes."
"The only thing that I don't like about this job is that I look at Bloomberg 365 days a year, many multiple times per day, et cetera. You're chained to it"
$AMZN $NFLX "two companies that I would have people study for sure."
"People forget, maybe 2002, the quarter before they started Amazon Prime, company revenues grew 9%. It was a young company, and the rate of growth had been declining. It was sort of a bet the company thing."
"Netflix went through 2 enormous pivots. One was sending DVDs through the mail...Clearly the business was migrating to online... very unclear what the results of that were going to be. Secondly, they realized, we got to spend a whole ton of money getting our own content produced"
"Both of those things, not only saved the company, but created value, but created significant moats."
"Retailing is a lot about culture and it taught me what makes a good culture and what doesn't make a good culture. It taught me also about how things can be replicated and what scale means and what can be done with scale. I would say those are probably the two biggest things."
The story of Chobani is so wholesome and also a good example of how companies can get funded outside of VC.
Taking big risks, Chobani founder Hamdi Ulukaya went all-in betting on his heritage and a powerful emerging consumer trend.
Ulukaya grew up in a Kurdish dairy-farming family. After being questioned by police over his interest in the Kurdish-rights movement, he wanted to leave.
A fried recommended America. Ulukaya hesitated: “We thought capitalism was the reason for the suffering of poor people."
But in 1994, he made the move. First to Long Island, then upstate New York where he worked on a farm while studying.
With almost no English, he was "extremely scared. I was aware that this was going to be very, very difficult. But I was excited.
"I developed a theory: in between 2011 and whenever hedge funds got around to hiring full-time Internet analysts again, they would need all the help they could get analyzing Internet stocks. And who better to help them than a former stock market junkie turned digital marketer?"
"Hiring someone with a weird background, who gets rejected at the first-pass HR filter, is a non-correlating bet. And portfolio theory tells us that even if your non-correlating bet doesn’t do great on its own, your whole portfolio will do better if you take those bets."
This is from 1988, the beginning of the final leg of the Japanese bubble. Reminder that you can always find bull and bear arguments and rationalize what's going on.
In 1987, Fortune found only four tech billionaires: Bill Gates, David Packard, Bill Hewlett, and Ross Perot. Gates was the only one still running his business!
Olsen of Digital Equipment would have been another but he sold 77% of his stock for $70k in the 50s (worth $5bn by 87).
Gates: "The company is a high-tech stock, and high tech stocks are volatile. The price is not a reflection of the contribution we're making."
Ben Rosen, VC who invested in Lotus and Compaq:
"It seems like the three companies grew very rapidly, but they really didn't at first. Hewlett and Packard, and Gates didn't have to sell their shares to raise capital, so they wound up owning a lot of their companies."