A key facet of the argument against enforced population-based interventions (mandated vaccination, masks, lockdowns) for virus suppression is the degree to which severe disease susceptibility is influenced by individual lifestyle choices, independent of age
1/4
1/4
Including
- Physical inactivity
- Vitamin D deficiency
- Metabolic syndrome/obesity
- Food addiction to refined oils/sugar/carbohydrates
- Avoidance of nutrient-dense animal foods
2/4
- Physical inactivity
- Vitamin D deficiency
- Metabolic syndrome/obesity
- Food addiction to refined oils/sugar/carbohydrates
- Avoidance of nutrient-dense animal foods
2/4
It is unethical to impose such a heavy burden of compliance to coercive and restrictive population-based interventions onto individuals whose deliberate lifestyle choices place them at low risk.
3/4
3/4
As an aside, it is increasingly evident that governments around the world are using these population-based measures more as a means of control than any sort of public health solution.
4/4
4/4
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
