Hello San Francisco. I'm attending UCSF's July New Hospital Community Meeting, related to the design of the upcoming UCSF Parnassus campus remodel. Stuart Eckblad, their VP of Major Capital Construction Projects, says the community should be happy w/ updates to mass and size.
Stuart Eckblad is turning the meeting over to Jason Frantzen with Herzog & de Meuron to discuss design and massing.
Design guidelines
This hospital is truly millennial, because it has a "brand vision"—"a place that creates a strong connection to the people around it" and "promotes health and well-being for everyone"
The vision includes a vision for "omnipresent nature" and "residential scale," which I'm not sure go together????
I missed a slide called "Reducing the Perceived Scale." The next slide shows the original vision. Frantzen says people were worried about this.
Frantzen is talking about taking the overall volume and breaking it into smaller elements. It looks like they're not talking about making it shorter, but removing horizontal space from the middle of the hospital.
Conceputal model
New preliminary rendering for UCSF Parnassus
Frantzen says the hospital will now "step" in line with the homes across the street.
Now talking about floorplans
Standard floor plan...
...extruded to six floors.
"Stepping on the façade... to reduce the impact of the building"
Now about connecting the hospital to nature/Mt Sutro
Frantzen says they've decided to not cut into Mt Sutro. The hospital will now be entirely west of Medical Center Way to minimize the impact on Mt. Sutro
Now some conceptual drawings about extending the Mt. Sutro forest into the hospital
Now there's a video of a guy showing a scale model of the site at the design office in Switzerland, looking from the northwest
I have all sorts of questions about how architects make scale models
* giant hand won't be part of the finished courtyard
Fred Whitney, UCSF VP of Real Estate, is talking about infrastructure, including oxygen tanks. It's not possible to fit all infrastructure in the building due to its size.
Whitney is handing the presentation to Jason Frantzen to talk about where to locate the bulk oxygen tanks, adjacent to the hospital. Initially they assumed a utility site on the corner of Medical Center Way and Parnassus Ave. They found it would have a visual impact on the street
They decided to locate the tanks close to where they are today on Medical Center Way, to "reduce visual impact on the community and on the street"
Frantzen is talking about screening the oxygen tanks so they blend in. Second picture shows area of impact.
Richard Kennedy is now discussing landscaping.
Kennedy says birdsong can contribute to a sense of wellness for patients and visitors. He says the design team trying to find ways to create presence of nature in the hospital, especially on the building terrace on level six.
Rendering of a planned public garden in the hospital
Public rooftop on level six
Prospective rendering of the garden looking out over the City
Soil buildup will be needed for shrubs and plants to grow
Kennedy says that public dining will be a key attraction of the site [hospital food?]
Dining, in the future
Frantzen is turning the meeting over to Lily Wong, Associate Director of Community Relations at UCSF, to moderate the community discussion
There's a question about how the sixth level will be accessible to the public. Jason Frantzen says elevators will be available in the lobby.
Second caller says it's a beautiful building, but says there's discontinuity among the aesthetics of the different buildings on site. Will there be work to create aesthetic consistency?
Alicia Murasaki, Assistant Vice Chancellor of Campus Planning, says that's not in the scope of this project, but UCSF is working on it incrementally
Lily Wong says says several written comments have requested views of the project from the ground level in the surrounding neighborhoods.
The next caller lives near the site and says that the agree about the hospital not being consistent. They say it has a base, coronode, and wedding cake top. "The wedding cake doesn't really relate to anything."
Dennis Antenore is here. He says he's confused about the oxygen tanks being located east of Medical Center Way. He's asking about the availability of water for all this landscaping. "We're in a drought. It's long term—it's going to be very long term." So that's a concern.
Dennis Antenore, IIRC, is part of the coalition suing UCSF under the California Environmental Quality Act, along with Calvin Welch
Richard Kennedy says the plants to be installed will be native to California. He says the plants will be low-maintenance with as low water usage as they can make it to be.
Jason Frantzen with the design firm is answering Dennis Antenore's question about the location of the oxygen tanks
Next caller says the hospital looks lovely, but they wonder if the pullback from Medical Center Way has increased the height of the building. That would be higher than what's in the EIR. Also, they say that in the development of SF General Hospital, there were underground depts.
[I think they're asking if there would be underground departments or underground tunnels?]
Frantzen says they worked to bring the height within 294 feet in the original planning documents. The final heights are being defined now and will be provided in future documents.
Next caller is Ildiko Polony, executive director of Mt. Sutro Stewards. She's asking how big the oxygen tanks will be and if there will be a full plant survey. She says Mt. Sutro Stewards would be happy to consult on a plant list, including some rare native SF plant species.
Fred Whitney says they're looking at up to several thousand square feet of space. Anything they remove will be replaced in kind elsewhere to maintain the 61 acres.
Next caller is asking about the "overall energy supplies" for the campus/new building. What sustainable energy will be used, now that the City no longer installs gas installations? They're also concerned about water usage.
They're also asking if the outdoor garden will be truly public, because during the pandemic, outdoor spaces have been used as free public space by restaurants.
Fred Whitney says they'll have sustainability improvements with a focus on air quality, water usage, and overall community well-being. They're pursuing LEED Gold certification.
Stuart Eckblad says they intend to comply with City gas rules, but don't yet have a thorough answer.
That's all I have time for. Thanks for reading!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Hello San Francisco. I'm attending a Planning Commission meeting for an application to convert 1525 Pine St, currently a one-story diner called Grubstake in the Polk Gulch, into a mixed-use building with 21 homes & a restaurant using the state density bonus.
Planning Staff says the Housing Accountability Act applies and so findings of health and safety must be made if the project is to be denied. The opponents oppose on the basis of air, light, bulk, and density.
Hello San Francisco. I'm attending a meeting of the SF Planning Commission, to hear about 3832 18th St. The project needs a conditional use permit to demolish an SFH and use the state density bonus to build 19 units of group housing near the Castro/Upper Market neighborhood.
This project has been in progress for a while. Here's the last meeting
The sponsor is using the density bonus to request waivers from height limits, rear yard requirements, and dwelling unit exposure. There will be three on-site inclusionary units, out of 19 total. The planner says that despite its height, it will have substantial front setbacks.
Hello San Francisco. I'm attending a meeting of the SF Board of Supervisors Budget and Finance Committee meeting for the approval of a loan to @TNDC to build 100% affordable housing at 2550 Irving St.
Jacob Noonan with Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development is presenting. The loan will be used by TNDC to acquire the parcel for the development and to perform pre-development activities.
Supervisor Gordon Mar, representing District 4—where the project is located—says he'll pass on giving remarks until the Budget and Legislative Analyst's Office presents on the loan.
Cars are one of the most amazing and wonderful inventions in all of history. They serve us. They connect us. They liberate us.
The future should have lots more cars. Self-driving cars. Flying cars. Space cars! Cars are fantastic.
Nothing else:
* Takes you directly from origin to destination
* Is available instantly on-demand
* Can carry a family and/or packages
* Protects you from the elements
* Is safe to use at night and in all weather
For convenience, practicality, and safety, cars are unbeatable.
Cities should absolutely be designed around cars! Not as an exclusive consideration, but as one of the top considerations.
At an SFBOS hearing, a public commenter just said that the University of California is trying to push through its environmental impact report for UCSF before anyone could read its 5,000 pages.
Gotta love CEQA?
George Wooding (West of Twin Peaks Central Council) said that the 1987 MOU for UCSF was great because it forced UCSF to develop land in Mission Bay and Dogpatch for greater hospital capacity.
Hello San Francisco. I'm attending a meeting of the Haight-Ashbury Neighborhood Council. David Woo is MCing. Christin Evans will present on the Haight Street Neighborhood Commercial District, and Calvin Welch will present how the Haight voted.
Christin: I had an idea for this recovery plan. I'm also going to highlights from the shopping survey and start a dialogue about it.
Evans: I started worrying about Haight St vacancies in. 2016. A number of storefronts weren't being marketed, left vacant for long periods of time, so I started counting vacancies between Stanyan and Central.