Mostly results of a survey. 73% would support this tax extension. It's not an increase, you're already paying it. You'd just keep paying it for 10-15 years.
Boulder hasn't turned down a local tax in 12 years (I wrote this in 2020).
Anyway, here's my survey notes:
Survey results
73% would support 15-year extension
20% would oppose
7% undecided
64% would support $110M bond measure, $$ to nonprofits
23% would oppose
13% undecided
Most support for improving traffic flow (cars, bikes, peds): 79%
Boulder Creek Path corridor reclamation: 77%
Relocation of Fire Stations 2 and 4: 72%
Expansion of Fire Station 3: 69%
Most important expenditures
Transportation System Resilience: 81%
Progress Toward Climate Goals: 71%
Safe and Prepared Boulder: 70%
Active and Healthy Boulder: 46%
Customer Service Modernization: 40%
Much better/more info in the presentation I shared above.
Not gonna tweet much, bc we've covered this so thoroughly recently.
David Flaherty, from the survey co: Boulder voters know that infrastructure needs funding. They know we need this, and they will vote for it.
Lord give me the enthusiasm of a survey professional lovingly sharing the results in the greatest possible detail.
Council considering doing a bond measure at the same time as the tax (tax $$ would pay for the bond). Survey reflects considerable confusion, which Yates is asking about now.
Basically, how do we avoid ppl voting for one but not the other? There's a 9-pt difference in how they surveyed.
Flaherty: The text says the tax will pay off the bond. I think voters will support them both. (It was still 60%+ support for the bond)
Sorry I've let the convo slide without coverage. Kinda over it, tbh. Plus it's all really in the weeds haggling. I'll make sure you have the relevant info (what will be on your ballot).
Right now seems like we're leaning toward a 15-yr extension, with 10% going to nonprofits
But, as Brockett notes, there will be a public hearing on this (and all other city ballot items) later in the year, so it won't be finalized until August.
Brockett asking that council wait to hear from the public.
Friend: We make our decisions sometimes based on the emails we receive, which to me doesn't feel equitable. Some projects will be left out.
That's RE: what this tax extension can be used for. The ballot language may include specific projects or categories of projects (Transportation, climate, etc.)
OMG last item: Update on the city attorney search!
Friend, Yates (subcommittee) recommending continuing the search process. They didn't get enough applicants (12) and were apparently unhappy with the 2 finalists.
Quick update on board and commission vacancies:
2 on HAB, 1 on downtown mgt commission
Nagle/Brockett will notify ppl who have applied in past years and open it to new folks as well.
HAB = Housing Advisory Board
Brockett responding to Young's concerns last week that maybe there's an issue with HAB since it has a lot of turnover. The 2 resignations were ppl moving out of town.
Jump-starting this thread on the Boulder Rez resolution, bc it's so damned interesting and somewhat unprecedented. We rarely get pushback on neighbor opposition from the city.
Some background: The visitor center at the Rez got a serious redo in recent years, after the 2012 Parks & Rec master plan ID'd it as a need.
That included a restaurant/bar, to meet the goals of the 2017 concept plan for the new facility:
“extending shoulder season use opportunities, establishing partnerships with various groups to expand programming and offset construction and operating costs...
This is part of larger effort to stop unsheltered people from living in public places, including with increased removal of homeless camps. It was last discussed May 11 as part of annual homeless update. threadreaderapp.com/thread/1392280…
How the city's camping ban works right now is that it requires "activities of daily living" before cops can consider it violated, so they can't remove tents that aren't being lived/slept in overnight.
Moving on to consent agenda, which has quite a few things we're going to talk about.
All 3 law enforcement type things are on here, so I'll do a super quick rundown of those.
No booze on open space or parks land
Since mid 1980s, applies to public places within city limits - makes it hard to enforce on most OSMP land, which is not within city limits
Exemptions: Coot Lake, Boulder Reservoir, Flatirons Golf Course, East Mapleton Ball Fields, and Stazio Recreation Complex
Can get a permit, typically for special events (Boulder Creek Fest)
I'll prob tweet a bit of open comment tonight, since it looks like a lot of Gunbarrel folks are here to speak against the Celestial Seasonings project.
Planning Board approved that 6-0 (with conditions) on June 17.
Actually, let's just go ahead and look at that project now, shall we?
As a reminder, a call-up is where council votes to review a Planning Board decision. That doesn't necessarily mean they'll overturn it (that's incredibly rare) but they might want to have their own input.