My report, 'In Protection of Freedom of Speech' is now available here. The Executive Summary summarises the arguments. My thanks to @lozzafox & @thereclaimparty for commissioning this independent report. I am honoured that Ld Sumption wrote the Foreword.
reclaimparty.co.uk/wp-content/upl…
This Report makes six proposals:
(1) The word ‘abusive’ should be removed from section 5 and the words ‘insulting’ and ‘abusive’ should be removed from section 4A of the Public Order Act 1986:
...offences which criminalise speech or behaviour that is likely to or intended to cause harassment, alarm or distress. ‘Insulting’ was removed from section 5 but criminalises speech or behaviour that, while it might be unpleasant, should not be the concern of the state.
(2) Offences of stirring up racial hatred should be reformed to align them with the offences of stirring up hatred due to religious belief or sexual orientation by providing that they are committed only where there is intent to stir up hatred.
(3) The Hate Crimes Operational Guidance should be withdrawn or reformed to provide that police officers may not record speech or behaviour unless they reasonably believe that a criminal offence has been
committed after having evaluated all the evidence.
(4) The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Bill should be opposed outright. Alternatively, the Bill should be amended: (a) to provide that it criminalises only threatening behaviour and only where it is intended to stir up religious (or other) hatred;
...and (b) to include a provision protecting the free expression of belief that is as robust as section 29J of the (English) Public Order Act 1986.
(5) Website ‘hosts’ of ‘organic’ content that is not edited or published by them (in law) should be prohibited from removing statements unless their publication is or may be a criminal offence or a civil wrong.
(6) Employment law should be amended to include express protection for an employee’s speech outside the course of employment.
My warm thanks to Lucile Taylor and Anna Loufti for their many excellent contributions and advice and editing; and to Laurence and Toby Vincent for their ideas and support throughout.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Francis Hoar

Francis Hoar Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Francis_Hoar

18 Jul
I’m looking forward to the publication and launch on Tuesday of the report I have written, ‘In Protection of Freedom of Speech’, kindly commissioned by @LozzaFox with a Foreword by Lord Sumption.

thesun.co.uk/news/15620655/…
The report was commissioned by the @thereclaimparty but is independent. I currently have no party political affiliation.
The Report opposes the Online Safety Bill, a dangerous imposition on freedom of speech online which wld impose on social media companies a duty to remove content that cld cause ‘harm’ to an adult of ‘reasonable sensibilities’,irrespective of whether it is a crime or civil wrong
Read 9 tweets
12 Jul
This is a deeply regressive measure that reverses the progression of international humanitarian law and the common law towards respect for bodily integrity; and the recognition that that respect requires the protection of the right to informed consent and the absence of coercion.
Compulsory vaccination is not unknown in this country - it was tried in the 19th century at a time when the poor were expected to know their place and that place was set by Poor Law Guardians. Aside from the effect on their bodily integrity and dignity, it was not a success.
But it was the 20th century that unveiled what medical professionals can do when unchecked by the protection of the dignity of the human person and his right to bodily integrity.
Read 15 tweets
6 Jul
@IainDale @lucyallan Yours are pig ignorant.

Care to identify a single country or state in which the introduction of a mask mandate has made any difference to the growth or decline or infections, hospitalisations or deaths?
@IainDale @lucyallan Because the studies about mask efficacy in clinical settings (indecisive but irrelevant to their use in the community) & the limited randomised controlled trials about their use in the community (which show they make no difference)are now diversions in the light of that evidence.
@IainDale @lucyallan If mask *mandates* requiring them to be worn in the community make any difference to infection, you would be able to identify when they were introduced.
Read 4 tweets
14 Jun
@SCynic1 @AdamWagner1 @DAaronovitch What factors haven’t I balanced?
In answering your question, take account of the following:
@SCynic1 @AdamWagner1 @DAaronovitch That, before the People’s Republic of China, no modern state has ever restricted the movements of all its citizens in response to a respiratory virus;
Or any state, for that matter;
@SCynic1 @AdamWagner1 @DAaronovitch That all state and WHO pandemic plans didn’t just recommend against restrictions on healthy people, they didn’t contemplate it while recommending against mass testing once a virus had become endemic ( apps.who.int/iris/bitstream…);
Read 8 tweets
14 Jun
Thanks, @Ed_Levey, for speaking out on this.
Elevating one issue above all others is at the core of this insanity. Respiratory pandemics fizzle out not by infections reducing to minimal levels but by natural (and now artificial) immunity & the evolution of less dangerous strains.
It is crazy to measure the progress of this one by ‘cases’ - and even crazier when they are not all cases in any meaningful way as they include asymptomatic infections.
And it is dangerous to link our ‘freedoms’ (or rather the licence given to us by the state) to the progress of one virus.
Read 4 tweets
5 Jun
Great research into the ethical and safety standards of the company whose product has just been given emergency authorisation to be used on 12-15 yr olds.
This is on the basis of the testing of only around 2,000 children.
Let’s measure that against the risk of Covid to them:
(First, here is the source for that testing figure: apple.news/A0qqUpNzRQ6KSv….)
In two respiratory virus seasons (considering that March-May 2020 can be treated as one) only 40 children have died in England within 28 days of a positive PCR test showing they have been infected with SARS-CoV-2, out of a population of around 11 million.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(