"We said all along this was a purely partisan exercise by Democrats. Nancy Pelosi’s rejection of me and Jim Jordan shows once again she is most partisan figure in America today. American people deserve truth. Unfortunately, Spkr. Pelosi is afraid of the facts." -- Rep. Jim Banks
Stefanik 🔥🔥🔥 on "Nancy Pelosi, the Radical Authoritarian Speaker of the House": "the Pelosi partisan Jan 6th commission was never about investigating facts, was only ever about Pelosi's radical politics and the Left's endless obsession with crushing any discussion or debate."
More🔥from Stefanik: "This commission is an absolute sham and has been a disgrace from the beginning; no amount of drooling excuses from the mainstream media will change that."
Stefanik: "What is Nancy Pelosi so afraid of? She is afraid of the American people finding out the truth that her failed leadership and the gross mismanagement of the U.S. Capitol led to the tragic events that day."
Stefanik: Pelosi "is afraid of millions of peaceful and patriotic Americans across country who are fighting for election integrity. She is afraid of her Republican colleagues who will work every day to hold her accountable for destroying this country and United States Congress."
Stefanik: "Time to Fire Pelosi once and for all. I have no doubt that after next November, Nancy Pelosi will never, ever hold Speaker's gavel again. She will make history as most despised Speaker of the House who will be fired not once, but twice. And it can't come soon enough."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mollie

Mollie Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MZHemingway

30 May
1) MPD reportedly used tear gas night before, when clearing "peaceful protesters" in order to save historic church, claim it wasn't part of pre-Trump clearing next day.
2) Park Police said used pepper balls (which media used to say was different than tear gas but now say is same)
Back when rioting was 100% supported by media, days of violence in DC. One night, the "peaceful protesters" set historic St. John's on fire and MPD, not Trump admin, used tear gas to get fire trucks in to save it. That's a different event than early evening clearing of Lafayette
For that clearing, media specifically claimed "CS" gas was used. Park Police said it wasn't, used smoke bombs and pepper balls. Media then claimed that even though they repeatedly used to say pepper spray was different than tear gas, that now it was same. thefederalist.com/2020/06/03/aft…
Read 5 tweets
16 May
When the media and other prominent Democrats all the way up to Hillary Clinton and Jimmy Carter spent four years hysterically repeating that Donald Trump was a traitor who colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election, we didn't call that a "big lie." Why is that?
That lie was used to win multiple elections. It *dominated* news, with daily updates suggesting it was somehow true. It was used to bully weak Republicans away from an agenda. And for telling the lie, the media gave itself many awards. But for some reason it wasn't called a lie.
But in an election when media invented fake stories (Afghan bounties, Aisne Marne), suppressed real ones (Biden family corruption), pushed fake polls, unprecedented tech censorship silenced opposition, and there was a "revolution" in voting, you can have no questions? Convenient!
Read 4 tweets
6 May
That anyone is talking about Cheney is proof of her failure. Her job is to raise $$ (she doesn't), stay on message (HA!), and not undermine caucus (it's all she does). If you're pretending this is only about joining with media/Pelosi for impeachment, you're not serious.
Yes, we know she seethes with hatred for Trump as much as she loves decades-long interventionist wars without exit strategies or metrics for success. Good for her. But that's not what her job is, and, in fact, her twin obsessions have repeatedly led her down the wrong path...
E.g., not only was she not a needed truth-teller in pushing back against media/Democrats' false and dangerous 2016 election conspiracy theory about Russia, and its many attendant problems, she was also the prime pusher of the discredited, anonymously sourced Russian bounty story.
Read 5 tweets
4 May
President Trump is speaking to pro-life ⁦@SBAList⁩ tonight.
He just pointed out that VA Gov. Ralph Northam got in more trouble for blackface than he did for saying babies who are born should be allowed to die if mother chooses, and that he thought that was opposite of way it should be.
Trump is joking about how large Pelosi’s mask was the other night. Said he’d never seen anything so big. Says it hurts vaccine acceptance when Democrats wear bigger and bigger masks after vaccination.
Read 11 tweets
20 Mar
"The increased power of the press is so dangerous today because we are very close to one-party control of these institutions." Federal Judge Laurence Silberman warned in a dissent yesterday. cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opini…
"The New York Times and The Washington Post are virtually Democratic Party broadsheets. And the news section of The Wall Street Journal leans in the same direction." Judge Silberman noted.
"The orientation of these three papers is followed by The Associated Press and most large papers across the country (such as the Los Angeles Times, Miami Herald, and Boston Globe). Nearly all television—network and cable—is a Democratic Party trumpet," Judge Silberman added.
Read 12 tweets
16 Mar
Today's reveal that WaPo allowed a political opponent to anonymously invent Trump quotes is quite the story. But my favorite "anonymous" story remains "Anonymous"! That was when the NYT tried to suggest a disgruntled low-level staffer was Trump cabinet official or family member.
And instead he was like "John Willoughby, III," at the Bureau of Engraving or some such. I love that story so much. Also, there were no repercussions for the NYT, other than the further loss of credibility. WP and CNN also ran puff pieces/hired the low-level dude. Good times.
Also when CNN used two "anonymous" sources to falsely accuse Don Jr of having advance knowledge of a Russia Wikileaks thing but it turned out that their supposedly independent "sources" both managed to get the date on the email wrong. Also that other outlets "confirmed" it. Fun.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(