What did Amnesty claim when the story was first released?
Amnesty has access to over 50k phone numbers of people of interest by clients of spyware company NSO.
3/n
What is Amnesty claiming now?
"Data is irrefutably linked to potential targets of NSO Group's Pegasus spyware."
4/n
Did Amnesty claim that the list was of people who were hacked? No.
Amnesty claimed that this was a list of people who were of interest to the clients of NSO. Forensic analysis of a selection of phones on the list has either shown Pegasus infection or attempts to hack.
5/n
How did the list come about?
According to Forbidden Stories founder Laurent Richard (@laurentrichard0), the numbers were entered by NSO's customers into NSO's system. (Listen from 0:56).
6/n
How did Forbidden stories describe the list since Day 1?
"A leak of more than 50,000 phone numbers selected for surveillance by the customers of NSO group."
7/n
So what's the list of 50k numbers about again? Has there been any backtracking?
There has been no backtracking. Since Day 1 of this story, the list has never been claimed of those who were hacked, but of those who were of interest to NSO's clients.
8/n
Driven by media propaganda, BJP is now claiming that everything is fake.
The only truth here is that people's phones were indeed hacked, and this included Indian journalists and activists whose phone numbers were on the leaked list, and BJP is lying.
9/9
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Hello friends, this month @AltNews is behind on donations. We are 6 lakhs short of what we need monthly. Please consider making a contribution to @AltNews.
Do listen to this 41 second clip, and I'll try and answer a few questions that were raised by @bhupendrachaube in his conversation with @MichaelKugelman.
1/n
Chaube: I searched Twitter, could not find a handle called Amnesty Forensics Department or Amnesty Forensics Lab.
Yes, because the handle is called @AmnestyTech, and has been around since 2016. [I can give a quick tutorial to folks at India Ahead as to how to use Google.]
2/n
Chaube: How has all of this suddenly appeared?
No, it hasn't suddenly appeared. Amnesty has published previous stories detailing how NSO+Pegasus has been used against human rights defenders. This is a story from 2019.
[Thread] The new IT Minister is trying to mislead the Parliament by suggesting that the only evidence available right now is that the numbers have appeared in a leaked database, and that the phones have not been analysed.
1/n
A peer-reviewed forensic report by @amnesty has shown how phones of certain Indian users who were targeted show clear signs of a Pegasus Malware infection.
I can't relate to a lot of my fellow country people anymore, and the reason for that is not because we speak a different language, or follow a different culture, or live in a different state. It is because our perceived realities are completely different.
1/n
The politics of this country has divided us in a way which cannot be undone. At this point in time, I see no possibility of ever being friends with these individuals even if we crossed paths in life because their perception of reality is completely different than mine.
2/n
They (the ones I can't relate to) on the other hand seem to have the same opinion about me and many others like me - they think that our reality is warped. I, and many like me, don't like them, and they don't like us. It is a complete breakdown.
3/n
Indian Police is sending requests to Twitter to take down content posted by likes of @MANJULtoons, @zoo_bear claiming that it violates Indian law. We don't know which police department is sending these requests, nor do we know what law their tweets violate - no transparency. 1/n
But since when did police become the judiciary in India? How does police get to decide what content violates Indian law and what doesn't?
2/n
Are there any police complaints/FIR corresponding to these tweets? Was there any investigation launched to determine if the content violates Indian law? There's absolutely no information.
3/n
While many are rejoicing Twitter marking posts of BJP leaders as 'Manipulated Media', and others are accusing Twitter of bias, I think we must all pause and reflect on this policy.
{Thread}
Why has Twitter decided to mark those particular posts as 'Manipulated Media'? - That is the question any user will have when they see that tag, but there's no answer to it. How did Twitter determine? Have they provided a reference to their findings for their users?
Fact-checkers debunk misinformation, on all sides of the ideological spectrum, every single day, and very often of the kind where original media has been manipulated. Twitter doesn't mark those as 'Manipulated media'.