A financial incentive may be the key to this bizarre request from the UCP. That would be common garden-variety corruption. But, it could be more... 1/10
You know the conservatives are wooing the gun crowd, right? So what is the next logical step after a woman in a hijab gets badly beaten or killed by someone she sprayed with pepper spray? 2/10
Someone in the UCP is going to announce that obviously, pepper spray isn't sufficient. Maybe the public needs access to tasers, or guns, to protect themselves. This is upping the commercial value of the product being promoted significantly... 3/10
And also kicking firearms restrictions to the curb. This would delight the NFA and the CCFR, as well as gun and taser manufacturers. 4/10
This has become standard conservative MO of late. They find an issue tangentially related to their goals, that they feel they can get buy-in on from everyone left of the right. Like the CPC bill to ban sex-selective abortions. 5/10
Sure, they thought, we can sell this as a women's rights issue. After all, it discriminates against female fetuses. Then we can get an abortion law on the books. After there is one, no one can say that abortion isn't a legal matter in Canada anymore. Then there can be more. 6/10
But they are no more interested in women's rights than they are in protecting women in hijabs. There is another motive for wanting to arm citizens in Alberta. My guess is, it is to whittle away at firearms regulations. Incremental change. Get people used to packing spray. 7/10
Then, when people being assaulted with pepper spray becomes a big problem, they can declare that people need something more to protect themselves. And the gun lobby will be more than happy to hop in with solutions... 8/10
It's sad that conservatives can't come up with solutions that don't involve escalating problems. Public education, government officials actually condemning these attacks (without the wink, wink, and dog-whistles), and fostering a climate of inclusivity... 9/10
In which such attacks are simply socially unacceptable, are all de-escalating ways to address these terrible occurrences. But, none of those things help the conservatives achieve their goals. So they won't go there. 10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I was sorting some papers this morning and I came across some typed copies of letters that were sent between family members back in the 1870s and 1880s. A member of the family had left home in Ontario, determined he was going to make his fortune in California, and vanished.
1/22
Finding stuff like this always inspires me to do genealogy, and what happened to this guy has always been a family mystery. So I dug in again on the "What Happened to William?" file. 2/22
One of the letters was from one of the brothers who had stayed home in Ontario, to one of his sisters, my great-great grandmother, who had moved with her husband and children to farm in Manitoba. There was the following passage: 3/22
It's a difficult thing to understand for normal, rational people who expect things to be a certain way. Let's take newspapers as an example. We expect newspapers to be devoted to giving the public an unbalanced account of the events of the day. 1/20
Newspapers used to be local, and usually small. Now 100s of newspapers are owned by a very few large corporate interests...And to the people owning the newspapers, they are an asset. They could be any asset. They could be making sleeping bags instead of newspapers. 2/20
The news isn't even the point. Newspapers make their money on advertising. They are not selling information to the public...They are selling your eyeballs to advertisers. So, the actual news, the quality of reporting, the accuracy, is of very limited interest to the owners. 3/20
There is so much happening now that is just not normal. And I am not talking about there being a pandemic.
I am talking about things like a Canadian MP calling on the Government of Canada to bow to an American Republican senator's demands. 1/18
What does "unilateral reopening of the US/Canada border" even mean? Is this US senator suggesting the American army should just march to the border crossings and force their way through? That's sort of what it sounds like. And a Canadian MP is supporting this? Not normal. 2/18
But then, Ms Rempel-Garner and other CPC MPs have a history of airing Canada's laundry on American TV and other media. 3/18 cbc.ca/news/opinion/c…
I was weeding this morning and came across a plant that sent out very nasty vibes. It looked "wrong". I found out what it was. Black Henbane, part of the Nightshade family. Very toxic. 1/3
I have removed 5 of them now, wearing protective gear (long sleeves, long pants, rubber boots, gloves). But now I am itchy, especially my arms. Psychosomatic? Also, why do I have nightshade in my yard? I definitely didn't plant it... 2/3
I know it is invasive in parts of the western US. Has it become prevalent in southern Alberta as well? If you see these in your yard, you may want to carefully remove them. Very toxic to humans and animals! 3/3 #InvasiveSpecies#ToxicPlants#GardeningLife
Canadians: We love our universal healthcare!
Conservatives: We promise to give you the right to pay for your healthcare.
Canadians: We value public education!
Conservatives: We promise to give parents the right to choose to educate children at home or in a charter school.
1/10
Canadians: We believe in strict firearms laws!
Conservatives: We promise to make it easier to get more guns, more kinds of guns.
Canadians: We love our multicultural society!
Conservatives: We promise to limit immigration to people wealthy enough to "contribute" to society. 2/10
Canadians: We love and value our pristine wilderness!
Conservatives: We promise to monetize all those empty spaces out there.
Canadians: We love arts and culture and libraries and museums!
Conservatives: We promise to make Rodeo the national sport.
3/10
Right. So, would O'Toole pull a "Harper" and tell the US President that "it's a no-brainer" to approve the pipeline that many Americans oppose? It didn't do a darned bit of good when Harper did it, it wouldn't change anything if O'Toole did it. 1/18
I want to point out 3 things here. 1. Production in the oil sands has doubled since 2007, while the number of jobs in the industry has steadily declined. Do you know why? Hint: It's got nothing to do with PM Trudeau... 2/18
It's automation. Oil and Gas companies are automating more and more of their processes, so they need to employ fewer and fewer human workers. It's cheaper, machines don't have to be flown in and out, housed, fed, paid... They don't complain nearly as much, 3/