Vaccine policy was in the news lots this week regarding #JCVI's decisions on COVID vaccinations in teenagers. It's been highly contentious. Some I agree with. Some I don't. But I respect that they'll have deliberated carefully on this complex decision.
1/
sciencemediacentre.org/expert-reactio…
Here's my short summary of vaccine policy considerations:

The objectives of vaccination usually boil down to either:
- protecting individuals from specific diseases,
- and/or protecting populations.
2/
We may use vaccinations to protect selected high risk groups, who are either at high risk of getting infected (e.g. healthcare workers) or spreading the infection (e.g. kids), or if the consequences of the infection are severe (e.g. the elderly or immunocompromised).
3/
We may use vaccinations to contain an infection in a population by reducing the number of infections, interrupting transmission between people, generating herd immunity &/or preventing outbreaks & epidemics. We do this with Measles & Diphtheria for example.
4/
Lastly, we may use vaccinations to try to eradicate an infectious agent. This is difficult, costly & needs global efforts. We do this where consequences of infection are very high e.g. smallpox & polio. Needs political will, commitment, funding, international cooperation.
5/
Usually vaccine policy decisions consider
(1) Disease burden: not just deaths but also morbidity (short & long term) & the no. of infections,
(2) Whether immunisation is the best strategy for controlling this disease vs other possible measures.
6/
Key question: What's the net impact of introducing the vaccine?
Need to consider the impact on disease burden (i.e. vaccine effectiveness), vaccine safety (adverse effects?),
& feasibility & practicality of introducing it bearing in mind other vaccine/healthcare activity.
7/
How much disease vaccinations will prevent will depend on:
- Disease burden in the age group to be immunised
- Vaccine effectiveness & likely coverage/uptake
- Indirect effects of immunisation on disease transmission
8/
Need to factor in possible negative effects of vaccine programme especially re: adverse events & impact on vaccine confidence. Once you lose public trust in a vaccine it is hard to recover. Moreover, it isn't just public confidence for this vaccine but may affect others too.
9/
Vaccine delivery is a huge operation. Involves vaccine acquisition, transportation & storage (cold chain key!), immunisation consumables needed, training, promotion, monitoring delivery/coverage/adverse events, recording on patient records, etc... Not a one-off cost either.
10/
Also huge opportunity costs. Staff diverted to vaccinations are taken away from other activities. Vaccines diverted to one population group (e.g. kids) are diverted away from another (e.g. boosters for elderly). International dimension too re: equity of vaccine distribution.
11/
There will be other considerations too:
- ethical issues (e.g. is it right to compel care staff to have it, or to vaccinate kids to protect the elderly),
- consent issues (esp those who can't consent to it),
- wider impacts (⬇️disruption to schools, economy, protect NHS)
12/
Vaccine policy decisions are rarely straightforward. The UK has an established & robust system for vaccine policy decision making. Vaccine policy decisions will have to be reviewed as new evidence emerges. Ultimately, a balance of risks vs benefits for both individuals & society.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Lee

Andrew Lee Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @andrewleedr

15 Jul
The AMS report last year wasn't far off its winter predictions. They've now produced another report for 21/22 which is worth a read:

👉COVID-19: Preparing for the future - Looking ahead to winter 2021/22 and beyond 15 July 2021
acmedsci.ac.uk/file-download/…
They predict a resurgence of respiratory infections (not just COVID19 but also flu & RSV); wider health & wellbeing impacts e.g. long COVID, mental & physical deconditioning, & impact of delays in diagnosis and
disease management during the pandemic.
Continued disruption to health and social care service delivery, including backlog of treatment & diagnosis, need to incorporate infection prevention & control measures, & financial precariousness of social care.
Read 5 tweets
7 Apr
JCVI statement on use of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine: 7 April 2021
Balance of benefit:risk still in favour of vaccination. Under-30s to be offered alternative vaccines instead if available, as a precaution.
gov.uk/government/pub…
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is rare.

Background rate 2-5 cases per million per year. Linked with cancers, autoimmune disease & blood clotting disorders, pregnancy, contraceptives, infections etc

Possibly 2-3 CVST per million vaccinations.
1/
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…
Let's put the risk in context.

In the past year, <4.4M people infected, ~127,000 deaths.

If all 4.4M were immunized, extrapolate ~22 CVSTs, but we would save >100,000 lives.

2/
Read 6 tweets
5 Apr
OpenSAFELY: Risks of COVID-19 hospital admission and death for people with learning disabilities - a cohort study

HT: @apsmunro @DFTBubbles

Some concerning trends...
1/

medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Cohort study of data from primary care linked to secondary care & mortality records in England.
89% of adults with Down Syndrome & 38% with cerebral palsy on the learning disability register.
For under-16s: only 34% with Down Syndrome & 11% with cerebral palsy on LD register.
2/
It matters that persons with learning disabilities are correctly identified & recorded on primary care registers. How else can reasonable adjustments be made, or they are identified correctly for immunisations, annual health checks, care plans, etc...?
3/
Read 5 tweets
27 Mar
An intriguing preprint (modelling study by LSHTM) just out: "Within and between classroom transmission patterns of seasonal influenza and implications for pandemic management strategies at schools"
1/
assets.researchsquare.com/files/rs-32236…
Simulations suggest⬇️class sizes may not be effective in⬇️risk of major school outbreaks, possibly due to contact behaviour between students i.e. students may have certain no. of ‘close friends’ with whom they have more interactions that could facilitate transmission.
2/
They suggest 2 approaches. Pre-emptive approach eg symptom screening, regular tests, ⬇️outside-class interactions & intermittent schooling. Or Responsive approach - single class closure where there's a case, but need to detect outbreak early before spreads outside the class.
3/
Read 4 tweets
19 Feb
On a lighter note this weekend, let me tell you the story of a (not so secret) service dedicated to protecting the human population from aliens.
1/

(They don't usually dress like that btw with exception of maybe @antmikeg & @Smithkjj )
And by aliens I mean the bug kind...

(Sometimes real biology looks worse than our imagined extra-terrestrial invaders)

If you've not guessed yet I'm referring to Health Protection teams across the UK who deal with communicable diseases & environmental health threats.

2/
HP teams are made up of a diverse lot of professionals: communicable disease control consultants, nurses, practitioners, scientists, epidemiologists, microbiologists, analysts, emergency planners, etc.... that reflect the skill mix required.

3/
Read 13 tweets
18 Feb
Normally I enjoy the high standards of journalism in @guardian . Not today as disappointed with misleading headline that suggest infections are spreading fastest in children. It'll worry parents/teachers & I doubt most readers will unpick the headline.
1/
theguardian.com/world/2021/feb…
The latest REACT1 report shows prevalence of infection in ALL age groups has fallen, including children aged 5-12 from 1.59% in Round 8 to 0.86% in Round 9a. The authors of REACT1 report also (wisely) didn't try to interpret the prevalence figures.
2/
spiral.imperial.ac.uk/bitstream/1004…
If this were a research trial you wouldn't place much weight on the age differences in % prevalence because of the wide confidence intervals, i.e. differences weren't statistically significant.
3/
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(