#ReinholdNiebuhr explains the DL Moody/Billy Graham-like version of Christianity is “too simplistic and perfectionistic” & impotent to address “collective sin.” This is why 2021 Reformed evangelicals have no way of explaining how/why their heroes also advanced white supremacy.
“Revivalistic Christianity” has never been effective, says RN, at challenging “collective[social]” evil. Eastern Orthodox, Catholic, and mainline P traditions have frameworks for this. So don’t expect “Great Commission” type Christians to even see evil beyond individual action.
Their perfectionistic view of Christianity thinks that rising out of a tub of water renders people incapable of participating in social evil, even if they are personally pious at home. It’s a deep Whitfield/Moody/Graham flaw emerging on the KDY/CRT/repararations controversy.
Don’t expect KDY-types to ever “get it” as long as they remain tied the theological flaws of an evangelicalism that has no developed theology of responding to social/collective evil. Read Catholics or the mainline for actual non-individualistic, non-perfectionistic thinking.
Maybe start here? “John Paul 2: The Encyclicals in Everyday Language, Definitive Edition of All Fourteen Encyclicals”amazon.com/dp/1570756317/…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I think it’s more accurately, white “evangelical” Christianity. The white mainline churches have embraced reparations for years. Also, I think evangelicals are struggling with this because reparations needs to *follow* a lengthy & detailed truth and reconciliation process.
The merits of the argument aside, talking about reparations first is not what happened in Germany, South Africa, Rwanda, Bosnia, Cambodia, Northern Ireland, etc. Reparations is step 3 or 4 and we haven’t even talked about steps 1 and 2 yet: a truth & reconciliation process.
I’ll write on this later but my guess is the KDY & many of white conservatives would have less objections to reparations if it was first situated in the context of transitional justice (it’s the basic process outlined in the OT) and is what seems to be missing in the controversy.
In 1957, #ReinholdNiebhur predicted why #evangelicals are paralyzed by #CRT & #systemicracism discussions, and so on, today. It all started from tragic flaws in the theology and preaching of Billy Graham.
Billy Graham and the evangelical “form of the Christian faith,” writes Niebuhr, “relies on an oversimplification of the issues in order to create the ‘crisis’ that prompts conversion and the acceptance of the Christian faith.
The best way of inducing this crisis is to call attention to some moral dereliction of the person, in which some accepted moral norm has been transgressed and the conscience is consequently uneasy.
Inadvertently, the TGC/T4G world discipled an entire generation of men toward prideful over-confidence, the absence of epistemic humility, and the assumption of pastoral omnicompetence. The DeYoung/Kwon/Thompson discourse is putting this on display. It’s sad to watch.
This is one of the reasons why the discussions about social issues now creates great divisiveness. Instead of the posture being, “these are difficult questions & we don’t know the answers.” The posture is: “a pastor is going to resolve complexity into certainty in 5-10 points.”
My ethics prof at Covenant Sem, David Jones, read about social issues for 27 years before he wrote his 1st book on them for a broader audience. Why? In part, epistemic humility. The more you read on a subject the more you realize how much you don’t know. wng.org/sift/david-cly…
Among the reasons most black women hate seeing black men with white women. I’ve been in circles where white women were presented to black men as a means for achieving greater spousal godliness over & against black women. But this photo, he needs the “Drop Squad.”
Also, for some reason, PCA church planting visionaries don’t know how much black women hate seeing this and wonder why hiring a black man married to a white woman isn’t drawing more black couples to their churches. It’s just basic missional sociology. 🤷🏽♂️
He agreed to this??? 🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️
I believe TGC may have appointed the wrong guy to be their lead movement voice on racial issues. Not sure why he’s be announced their race guy. It’s not going well. Article: “Sanctifying the Status Quo: A Response to Reverend Kevin DeYoung.” thefrontporch.org/2021/07/sancti…
It’s amazing the DeYoung didn’t use any black evangelical theologians. Think about that!!!
1998, my sermon: “How to Become A Reformed White Supremacist.” Motivation: watching a then PCA pastor at a conference defending US slavery. Realized that RUF in college wasn’t open about PCA culture. 23 years of explaining racism as a US Reformed historical norm. What’s crazy?👇🏾
When you explain to PCA, 1968er, SBC Reformed Baptists, Act29, etc. that American Calvinism has never not been coupled with racism against blacks in US history, you’re called “a lair”/“woke” even though 1000s of pages of historical documents prove it. Here’s what even crazier:
These same folks don’t have the humility to admit that their version of gospel Calvinism is tragically flawed because it has no way of addressing past racism without dismissing it as, “it’s a discipleship issue” 🤦🏽♂️🤬 or “it’s was misapplied.” Or “they weren’t *true* Christians.”