Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓 Profile picture
@BillyBostickson
Jul 25, 2021 • 26 tweets • 12 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
1. Remember Huff?
2. More Huff and Puff
3. Broad FOIA hint from Huff
@sai_suryan @USRightToKnow
4. Huff likes our Reports...
5. Huff likes my idea of EcoHealth handing over their digital devices for inspection and analysis by forensic experts, as proposed in:

(Report 1: PROPOSED FORENSIC INVESTIGATION OF WUHAN LABORATORIES)

researchgate.net/publication/35…

and targets named here:

researchgate.net/publication/35…
6. Huffing and Puffing to the FBI?
7. Huff Hates Daszak, that's Clear ;)
8. Huff Explains Why he Despises Daszak

"as the mere product of a broken and corrupt system"

whose

"mistakes could be responsible for the deaths of millions"

This is an ex VP of EcoDeathAlliance talking...

Journalists, for Chrissake!
9. An interesting "Like" from Huff

"You are the origin of conspiracy man, you are the origin of COVID and GOFF"
10. Huff Says Lab Leak Plain & Simple

"There is ample circumstantial evidence to support a Lab Leak. There is no circumstantial evidence to support natural emergence"

He should Know, right?
11. And Huff doubles up on that 🎆

Just remember who is saying this.
12. Huff on FB and Google WIV/Ecohealth
13. The Thorny Question of Data - Virus Data

"who collects the data, who decides what data is relevant and necessary, who controls the data, who regulates data validity and accuracy, who decides what data is entered in the system"

Try asking EIDITH...

14. The "probable lab leak from WIV"
15. Mounds of Peer Reviewed Shit Everywhere

Example:

"Peter Daszak's original, now retracted, Lancet Article on the origins of Covid"

Well spotted, Huff!
16. How much circumstantial evidence do you need?

"if this were a court of law for a criminal case, then the jury would find the defendant guilty"
17. Maybe a Pangolin kissed a Turtle?
18. Accountability is more important than Vaccines
19. Huff watching @dasher8090 and @quay_dr
20. Huff sums it up
21. What else do they know?
Huff (ex-EHA/DTRA)

Malone (DTRA/BARDA)


Both know much of the background & not happy about it

Main problem is they will only talk to Feds about certain aspects of interest

Let's hope they are singing!
22. My favourite screenshot

Did the Feds get the Message?

Are they squatting on it?
23. Keep an Eye on Huff!

unroll Huff Part 2 @threadreaderapp

Part 1 Thread is here:
23b. (Retry) Keep an Eye on Huff!

unroll Huff Part 2 @threadreaderapp
24. Huff Threads and Archived Versions:
Part 1: threadreaderapp.com/thread/1401265…
Archived: archive.ph/D2dBq
Part 2:
threadreaderapp.com/thread/1419133…
Archived: archive.ph/t1K7H
Addendum via @iC

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓

Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BillyBostickson

Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓 Profile picture
Jun 19
🧵@DNIGabbard docs

1. Noted in Document 1



Conditions Present for Laboratory Modification & Release of Human Adapted Coronavirus in Wuhan in Late 2019 (Z Report)

"We also used additional intelligence information from a CIA Field Analytic Conversation."odni.gov/files//documen…
🧵@DNIGabbard docs

2. Fauci and Pangolins

"On China’s pangolin research, Dr. Fauci said it was important to obtain details of the experiments"

"Dr. Fauci was particularly interested in the specific details provided on the research WIV was doing & on their work with pangolins"
@DNIGabbard 🧵@DNIGabbard finds out about DRASTIC ;)

3. Leaked Cutlip & Chretien report I published

drasticresearch.org/wp-content/upl…

"This account has screenshots x.com/BillyBostickso…
The individual is associated with drasticresearch.org, which has been tied to other leaked information"
Read 17 tweets
Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓 Profile picture
Jun 17
1. An Indecent Proposal for Protecting our Pensioners

and preventing their Further Decay!

It is a melancholy object to those who walk through our parks or scroll through our family chat groups to behold the wretched condition of our retirees.
2. These once-vigorous souls, now bent over glowing rectangles at all hours, doom scrolling through tales of grandchildren’s exotic holidays, political apocalypses, and filtered neighbours’ perfect kitchens.
3. Their posture collapses, their sleep evaporates, their blood pressure soars, and their remaining years dissolve into envious bitterness.
Read 15 tweets
Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓 Profile picture
Jun 11
1. Federal agencies like the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) as well as the NIAID were funding a remarkable array of research projects around the world..
2. "through a small cabal of civilian actors that in aggregate constituted a de facto bioweapons development program. In my job as data analyst for University of California, I had access to enough data to strongly suspect the existence of such a program"

mises.org/mises-wire/why…
3. This was written by Vincent Cook

He has a MA in Biophysics from the University of California, Berkeley. He worked as an analyst for thirty years in the University of California’s Office of the President.

mises.org/profile/vincen…
Read 17 tweets
Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓 Profile picture
May 13
1. August 17, 2021, was the date the CIA's COVID Discovery Team was forced to officially finalize & submit their changed conclusion.

Prior to August 17, 2021, 6 out of 7 members of the team had concluded with "low confidence" that COVID-19 originated from a lab in Wuhan, China.
2. The whistleblower just testified that following pressure & interference from mid-level & senior CIA leadership, the team's lab-leak findings were suppressed.
3. On August 17, 2021, the team was forced to reverse its stance and officially submit a conclusion stating they were unable to determine the origin, which formed the basis of the declassified ODNI report released later that month.
Read 10 tweets
Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓 Profile picture
Apr 29
1. Ducks and DURC in China (2026)

This is GOF research via experimental adaptation increasing pathogenicity which is DURC because it involves a listed high-risk pathogen and increases virulence via serial passage in a key reservoir host. i.e. DUCKS!

mdpi.com/1999-4915/18/5…
2. Lethal Duck Killer

The Jiangsu researchers deliberately turned a relatively mild H5N6 avian influenza virus into a highly lethal killer of ducks through repeated serial passage in duck cells and live mallard ducks.
3. Good opportunity to boost my Video from 2013!

What originally caused zero deaths in mallards was rapidly adapted into a strain causing up to 100% mortality, massive viral replication in organs, and severe disease..

Ping The Chinese Duck's Nightmare

Read 11 tweets
Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓 Profile picture
Mar 31
1. Here is yet another example of twisted biased agenda driven science

(Whether or not you are in favor of vaping)

theguardian.com/australia-news…

Clearly the pathetic excuses for science journalists at the Guardian & other MSM failed to fact check the paper:

sciencemediacentre.org/expert-reactio…
2. Prof Peter Shields, Professor of Medical Oncology at Ohio State University

“This paper does not add anything we do not already know, but selectively cites studies (and omits many others that refute the authors statements throughout) that leads the reader down the wrong path"
3. Prof Peter Shields (2)

“None of their mechanistic studies (selectively cited) has been validated as actual risk predictors in people, and the authors failure to recognize that leads to harmful conclusions."
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(