1. Someone on Linkedin asked this interesting question:
Anyone care to speculate why Fauci FOIA emails to non-government individuals (especially to Zuckerberg and Daszak) are heavily redacted with these codes?
(b)(4), (b)(6), (b)(7)(A)
2. (b)(4)
Reveal information that would impair the application of state-of-the-art technology within a U.S. weapon system
3. (b)(6)
Reveal information, including foreign government information, that would cause serious harm to relations between the United States and a foreign government, or to ongoing diplomatic activities of the United States
4. (b)(7)(A)
Reveal information that would impair the current ability of United States Government officials to protect the President, Vice President, and other protectees for whom protection services, in the interest of national security, are authorized archives.gov/declassificati…
5. Very interesting answers from Andrew Huff
"Since I directly reported to PD, worked on this project & in that classified space, my guess is that the derivative classifier is worried that the combined information from those emails will reveal derogatory information about US Gov"
6. Huff speaks out (1)
1. Dual Use Research of Concern- research at WIV paid for by NIH and managed by EcoHealth Alliance could have been mirrored in the classified space in the US.
7. Huff speaks out (2)
2. The gross negligence and mismanagement of research sponsored by NIH via EcoHealth Alliance at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, undermines state level relations between the US and China.
8. Huff speaks out (3)
3. Confirm that NIH was grossly negligent, or was directly knowledgeable, in mismanagement of funds directed to WIV through EcoHealth Alliance & did not properly manage obvious risks nor did they effectively oversee contract funds related to high risk DURC
9. Huff speaks out (4)
4. That NIH and FB and EcoHealth Alliance directly engaged in a cover-up scheme, where further investigations into the cover up will reveal classified research or intelligence, peripheral to the primary investigation of the cover up activity.
10. Huff speaks out (5)
"I guess that I could have also added biowarfare countermeasures but that could fall under bioweapons/DURC. There is probably some interesting backstory to the development of mrna vaccines pre covid"
11. Huff speaks out (6)
It would be interesting to know who, or if anyone, at Pfizer or Moderna, have security clearances, at what level, & when they were granted 😂
IC is pretty good at collaborating on R&D with industry via back channels, & hopefully the IC was not that stupid
"There is more evidence that COVID was the result of a lab leak, than the result of natural emergence. You are ignoring other key evidence and your argument is flat out nonsense."
18. Huff
EcoHealth 2014-2016
MSU 2016 - 2019
MTRX and Risk Factor Research - Current
19. The 4.6 Million USD DTRA Grant for GRITS put a smile on his face!
Minnesota Alumnus Receives $4.6 Million DoD Defense Threat Reduction Agency Grant aspph.org/minnesota-alum…
Interesting revelations about the "can of worms" Definitely worth a read, but a completely false history of #DRASTIC
Obviously @KatherineEban was misinformed
Best quote was from @dasher8090
Good to see Thomas DiNanno's numantine struggle at the heart of US bureaucracy recognised
Curtin points out that University of Virginia professor Phillip Zelikow, who led the 9/11 Commission in its cover-up, has now been nominated to head up a COVID Commission Planning Group to work with....
2. with the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security at the Bloomberg School of Public Health. Stand together indeed: Charles Koch, Bill Gates, Eric Schmidt, the Rockefellers, et al. funders of disinterested truth.
3. The group is funded by the Schmidt Futures, the Skoll Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation and Stand Together, with more expected to join in. Zelikow, a member of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s Global Development Program Advisory Panel, will lead the group..
C. "Those claims are groundless. The lab has not been aware of this situation [sick researchers in autumn 2019], and I don't even know where such information came from," (YZ)
3. Check that story with Koopmans?
D. " some scientists working at a Wuhan lab studying the coronavirus became sick in Fall 2019. She says China revealed the researchers tested negative for the virus" nbcnews.com/nightly-news/v…
1. Finally a Scientist who deserves respect, Microbiologist @DavidRelman (Who knows WIV very well btw) explores how the coronavirus could have emerged and why we need to know. med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/…
2. Opinion: To stop the next pandemic, we need to unravel the origins of COVID-19 pnas.org/content/117/47…
3.The "origin analysis" by @DavidRelman disturbed Daszak's complacency
1. SARS-CoV-2 variants arise during individual infections virology.ws/2021/04/22/sar…
A study of variation at the genome level indicates that diversity in a single host has been underestimated.
2. This is the story of what the doctors witnessed, over the course of his illness: the evolution of covid-19 inside his body. Before their eyes, they get a hint of what might be to come in the pandemic. wnycstudios.org/podcasts/radio…
3. COVID Variants May Arise in People with Compromised Immune Systems
The case history of a U.K. man in his 70s shows how selective “pressures” bring about viral mutations scientificamerican.com/article/covid-…