I doubt there is anything new that can be said on the topic.
Almost all scenarios have been explained by better minds, especially Dr AM, & I do associate myself with his thoughts.
2] As a bit of context, to me, the MDC-A long became a party, which initially, just like the MDC-T, had both a party & electoral name.
You would realise that now MDC-T calls itself both that, & simply MDC.
Looking at older tweets, MDC-A also called itself both that, & just MDC.
3] The decision to almagate as MDC-A, contrary to "popular" opinion, wasn't even a response to the SC judgement.
From as far as just after the death of MRT, movements towards MDC reunification, were evident.
In any case, the ALLIANCE agreement created opportunities for this.
4] The question of when exactly the MDC-A because a full-fledged party is for me, irrelevant
These people historically always had ways of legally & politically existing, even when the two seemed to be conflicting at time.
Difference was, it was an internal headache, unlike now.
5] If you listen to Guchutu's interview for instance, on why the MDC-A leaders at times behaved outside the ALLIANCE agreement without supporting "papertrail", you learn something.
His response was something like: 'as Principals, at times we met & made decisions as we pleased"
6] Before I exhaust you with that context, the question perhaps is, "why not change the name"?
The answer is, that decision is both "legal" & political.
For instance, do you not wonder why noone asks Dougie to change their party name!
What does the "T" in his party stand for.
7] The "T" in MDC-T didn't just mean "Tsvangirai".
It meant 'MDC party LED by Tsvangirai.'
How then is he leading it, in death?
Answer is, it's all about the electoral weight it supposedly holds.
Sadly for Dougie, he ignores its 2018 weight, and is conveniently stuck in 2008.
8] So with time, the current MDC-T will have to also swiftly move away from that "T"
I can't even see them using it in 2023, or even for the by-elections.
If they don't just revert back to MDC, they will want the name MDC-A, to "build" from its 2018 electoral performance.
9] You seldom hear the ference to "MDC-T" by Adv NC's group post the polls.
It was just MDC & with time, just MDC-A.
Speaking politically, the same way Baba Bertha needs to maintain the MDC-T name, Adv Chamisa too, "needs" to maintain the MDC-A name, for now.
2023 is 2023.
10] Rebranding.
Funny enough, history has contradictions, regarding the effects of the MDC name.
Use of the MDC name did relatively well for Prof Ncube.
It did nothing for Sikhala.
It did nothing for Dr Khupe.
Change of name did nothing for Biti & was even worse of Mangoma.
11] So whereas its important to maintain the same names used for elections, within the election cycle, post it, any guess is as good as mine.
So for the meantime, I accept why it makes no political sense for the MDC-A to rebrand.
They have a 2018 agenda to see through.
12] Also, rebranding is seen as succumbing to defeat.
It's a lie that the MDC-A name legally belongs to DM.
There is no legal basis for that.
It's even worse for him, cause it's not a political reality either.
It's just him trying to stand on the shoulders of both MRT & Chamisa
13] So when you say to Chamisa "rebrand, the name will be given to Mwonzora" (which is true), are you also telling him that its alright for ED to give parties names as he pleases?
Are you saying this is a battle that can't be won or shouldn't be fought?
That has to be clear.
14] Calm heads are clearly needed, as 2023 nears.
Important, and even hard decisions, will need to be made eventually.
The good thing though, is that Adv Chamisa appreciates the difficulties of Leadership and will himself tell you, unequivocally, that's he's up for it.
15] So, both NC & DM will "rebrand"
Fortunately for NC, history shows voters aren't docile.
Its tougher for DM who lacks the courage to face a MDC-A building from 2018.
His MDC-T is populated by political dodos.
Flightless when they politically lived & now extinct.
enkosi!
became*
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2] Up until now, noone knows the ALLIANCE partners who are being represented by this communique.
MDC-PF guys would then think, if the likes of Biti & Ncube & Ngarivume are part of this decision, then its tantamount to un-scrambling the egg, & that MDC-A isn't a party after all.
3] What this narrative conveniently ignores, is that its actually the Supreme Court judgement that unscrambled this egg.
Dougie et al, jumped at this development.
If the MDC-T went back to 2014, it can't be earth shaking, that the ALLIANCE people have gone back to 2017.
1] This is what some of us mean when we say Baba Bertha has no mandate.
In his own words, he wants to dialogue with ED for electoral reforms so that there won't a repeat of the previous electoral disputes like that of 2018 "...which our colleagues (MDC-A) are complaining about"
2] In other words, Baba Bertha wants to dialogue on behalf of another party, which has a clear electoral mandate, and ability to represent itself, its supporters, & its voters.
In the same vein, Baba Bertha exposes his lacks the courage, in admitting the rigging of 2018.
3] Instead of simply saying electoral reforms will put to an end rigging & electoral disputes, DM makes it a "MDC-A" issue.
Yet at the same time, he & his ilk, want to claim the electoral performance of the same MDC-A.
They conveniently want to be it, only when its preferable.
1] NGOs are a very important development partner in Africa in general, & Zimbabwe in particular.
To the best of my knowledge, they are cleared by relevant authorities & work directly through gov Ministries with which they have MOUs, as they "compliment government efforts".
2] The office of the PDC or DDC (former PA & DA respectively) are ZanuPF political structures populated by unelected & incompetent political figureheads.
Both offices simply disturb the work of Councils.
The same explains the creation of the office of State Ministers.
3] I fail to, respectively, understand how a PDC has the competence, let alone legal footing to regulate the operation of NGOs (which is important).
With the size of Harare, only @TMuguti knows how he plans to execute this.
Allow NGOs to operate freely through line Ministries.
1] Meanwhile, said Tungamirai Madzokere on ZimboTV Live:
"@OurMDCT Leadership, led by Yvonne Musarurwa came to my house and told me that my release from prison was necessitated by @DMwonzora as part of his negotiation with ZanuPF for supporting Const Amendment Bill number 2..."
"This exposes injustices in Zim as courts are influenced by the Executive & the Legislature, which shouldnt be the case. The Constitution we wrote clearly separates the Judiciary, Parliament, Executive & Cabinet. We shouldnt be having one influencing judgements"
3] T Madzokere:
"I cannot be happy for being released due to political intervention. I want to be released because I committed no crime. The scholarly judgement shows the intervention of God with Judges being Spokespersons of the heavenly intervention, because of my innocence"
My biggest problem with the politics of "rational disputation" is that it equalizes the behaviour of the perpetrators of electoral violence & its victims.
You cant say to both, "asifuni iviolence".
Had Zimbos been violent, we would have had civil wars.
You equally can't sweep down the proverbial carpet, the experiences of Zimbabweans at the hands of the State, by hiring merchants in the Opposition, to front a pseudo reconciliation & national healing drive.
You equally don't attempt to be seen as desperately "siding" with the citizens, by driving a half-baked, revisiont anti-ED agenda that separates him, from Mugabe, yet he was his Chief Elections Agent in 2008.