The reason you should be skeptical of these studies is it’s not like men have more hours of the day, and comparing coupled men and women and coupled parents we know that men have virtually sleep+leisure time… so there’s gotta be work not classified as such.
The exact issue varies. Sometimes what’s happening is men’s contribution to yard work is not counted as house work. Sometimes commuting isn’t counted. Sometimes there are no demographic controls so it’s just prevalence of single parents driving the result.
But the reality is that in apples to apples comparisons men and women have extremely small differences in their “total work commitments.” And the higher prevalence of single moms than single dads is not ONLY about deadbeat dads, but also…
… about women having a much better win rate in custody fights, and in a nontrivial number of cases (maybe at least 1%, no more than 9%, of births; much higher among just unpartnered!) women not even informing fathers a child is born!
Deadbeat dads are obviously an issue, but it’s obviously also true a lot of moms actively prevent nonresident fathers from interacting with their kids.
That’s why I dislike dumping single parents into the calculation: it’s a complicated issue how to think about their time use!
But for coresidential partners, we can see a clear test. And for those partners, the total time bill of work is pretty similar on average.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Before COVID, nobody laughed at the CDC saying stuff like “the age of infectious disease is over.” The CDC was rapidly expanding its focus on non-communicable diseases and we all got to live this easy happy life where we never had to worry about it.
This period of frivolous decadence, vanity, and callous disregard for human life is over. The truth is that since the 1980s, we have seen a very large increase in novel infectious diseases arising, and the number of potential threats is rising fast too.
We are probably re-entering a period where infectious disease is gonna be a more frequent issue. If it’s not SARS or MERS or COVID or Ebola or AIDS it’ll be something else: resistant tuberculosis, for example.
the correct way to order medals is to multiply the (Number of Competitors in Event) / (Number of Competitors In Event From Country X) by 3 for a gold, 2 for silver, 1 for bronze, and use that as "medal points."
Because countries have different numbers of competitors qualifying for each event and because events themselves have different numbers of qualifying participants the actual extent of competition in events varies. Golds are not in fact equally impressive in all events.
An argument could be made against penalizing a country for having more entrants since they still had to qualify, however participating in the Olympics is not *purely* on merit.
Sports are corrupt. I don't mean corrupting, I mean sporting institutions at almost all levels are corrupt. High school sports are corrupt in their recruiting of kids; you don't get shady recruitment for math class.
College sports are corrupt: witness the admission buying scandal, or else look at the non-criminal ways wealthy kids get into prestigious schools as "athletes."
Professional sports are corrupt: hello taxpayer financed stadium deals!
Bangladesh did an absolutely massive randomized controlled trial on mask promotion at the village level, with results to be published.... soon I believe? They published effects of promotion on mask wearing, haven't published death results yet.
You can read about the results of mask promotion on mask wearing here: nber.org/papers/w28734
They conducted seropositivity tests in June to see if COVID infections actually were higher/lower 12-months post intervention. They should be publishing results.... any day now!