This to me is the issue, if she got the yips, then sure, pull out if you're no longer confident in your athletic ability

It is the ideological response to this that I hate: that this makes her a *better* human, even a *superhuman*, somehow better than the actual winners
This isn't about her at all, it's about what the encompassing ideology wants from all of us:

To convince us that it is natural to be too anxious to function, and that rather than mustering the skills + will to push through your doubts, it is better—heroic!—to retreat from them
Simone Biles—definitely not us, the media!—could "change attitudes" about why it's actually good for you to be just as worthless as the massively dysfunctional journalist class that is redetermining your attitudes about the meaning of this event!
Whenever the professional propaganda class tells you "Person X is making us now believe in Thing," it's not about Person X

It's about the propagandists, who *they* are, what is fundamental to *their* being, what they want to reshape you into being along with them
When they tell us in total lockstep "It is braver for an Olympian to concentrate on her mental well-being than to compete," they are telling you they worship their own mental unwellness, that you should share in it, and if you don't, you're actually less of a human, not more
Leftism understands that it's nowhere close to being worthy of rule

This leads to mass anxiety among the propaganda class—they know they don't belong there. It eats at them from the minute they wake up to the moment they finally fall asleep.
The only way they can alleviate the unbearable anxiety that results from this is to inflict it on everyone underneath them.

They see the GOAT mentally breaking down, think "She's just like me!"—and then immediately rush to explain why, as it turns out, that's just like you.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Doctor-Baron 17cShyteposter, DDS

Doctor-Baron 17cShyteposter, DDS Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @17cShyteposter

31 Jul
This social blitzkrieg is completely fucking weird because it feels like it could alternately collapse by 2024 or reign for another hundred years

So it is easy to believe that either Anton (quick collapse) or Moldbug (long decline) is right. Result: schizophrenia
The American social trend is that progressivism undergoes rapid algal bloom every 30-odd years, though (2010s; early 1990s; 1960s; 1930s; 1900ish; 1865; 1830s), and then retreats for a generation

So the safe money is on this simply being another iteration of the cycle
The process of liberalism seems to be something like, Next generation comes up, finds the laws and norms it finds itself within ignorant and oppressive, and throws them off

You then enter a period of chaos and reordering
Read 10 tweets
17 Jul
It seems to me that a huge driver of leftism, on both its Marxist and liberal wings, is due to the fact so few people now own their own businesses or even *tenant* farms

A modern employee/renter seems to have less autonomy than even a serf expected to till his lord's land!
If this sounds insane, remember that the goal of the WEF is for you to own literally nothing, which means to be *responsible* for nothing. Which is a level of eternal childhood: for adulthood is the act of taking responsibility, and learning to steward for yourself
If I can stray off the reservation, I believe that much of the "alienation" of capitalism is in fact this, the alienation of people from direct ownership of their own businesses, or productive smallholder land.

That's what makes you feel human.
Read 6 tweets
17 Jul
When business was skeptical of if not tacitly hostile to the leftist urge, it created a kind of balance of powers

Now that it's working hand-in-glove with full-burn progressivism, we're standing on a very dangerous ledge, a political phase-shift we haven't seen since post-WW2
Between roughly 1948-2014, intellectual/bureaucratic life was essentially left-liberal

But business was largely right-liberal. So if you disagreed with gov-academic intellectual consensus, you could still exist within the economic sphere, that was not actively hostile to you
There was a kind of balance, which left politics essentially stable. Even during the Troubles of the 1960s-70s, when the ruling class reshaped political society, right-liberals could still participate within economic society. There was still an out to at least exist.
Read 7 tweets
16 Jul
Just lol

Despite all progressivism's efforts, humans still care about their own children. Since "education" is the most important element of your kid's life, deciding who controls that education is the best means to create a permanent cultural schism away from these people
This is why the campaign to ban CRT is critical. Not only is it working for once—fueled by parental urges that may be one of the only forces as strong as the leftist urge—but it opens the doorway to the creation of state-funded parallel institutions to the regime
Let's think through the three basic outcomes here

1) Anti-CRT wins outright, no more teaching white kids they're devils

2) Anti-CRT results in a muddled legal outcome that creates immense pressure for vouchers/school withdrawal

3) Supreme Court declares CRT the law of the land
Read 5 tweets
8 Jul
Yes, reminder that Orban and his party won Hungary's elections with a supermajority capable of rewriting its constitution at will.

But when it makes even the slightest move to do act on the will of its own people, its democratic action is treated as fascism by the unelected EU
In what sense is "democracy" real when the vast will of the Hungarian people can be overruled by unelected bureaucrats of super-national foreign powers imposing their own norms on a far smaller domestic electorate?

Is this colonialism, plz help me understand, democracy
You know what's really funny? Afghanistan

These people will spend two years scrubbing a country of its actual military hostiles, and the remainder of all of eternity killing Afghanis until they're willing to enforce American feminist democracy, which—whoops, we can't do lol
Read 4 tweets
7 Jul
Since liberalism is of the left, it will always enable the advance of the left, to the point where it's now advocating very principled liberal ideas like "the state must be allowed to teach white children that they are uniquely evil as a race"
Being a weak form of leftism, liberalism has no way to stop this process within itself

If liberals want to preserve their beliefs from getting devoured, this means they must sometimes resort to illiberal methods: like, say, banning CRT, and firing any teacher who breaks the law.
Rufo's managed to thread an incredibly fine needle (wielding illiberal power against lib "free speech," as used by the Cathedral) to assert post-WW2 liberalism (MLK-style equality) against left-illiberal "equity," at a *state* level, where the Constitution (might) still apply
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(