it's funny how a lot of 'intellectual dark web' adjacent dingdongs keep telling us how to convince Trump supporters to switch & how to convince antivaxxers to not be antivaxxers and how to convince QAnon people to not be QAnon people.
it's all bullshit. i'll tell you why
i used to be 1 of those people that often said "I'd be more woke if *this specific person* wasn't such a crazy idiot"
as long as I'd already made this bogeyman to oppose & put them on a fake pedestal (such as 'emperor of all public schools'), my mind was never going to change.
what changed my mind on all the 'woke' business was all the 'anti-woke' people showing their true colors as a bunch of lazy crybabies as all the 'woke' people consistently showed up.
nobody wants to be on the same side as a bunch of losers.
being nice to conservatives isn't really going to work. a lot of them are in cult. we don't need to pretend they have good intentions or whatever. it doesn't matter when their value system is divorced from reality
the fact is that there isn't tens of millions of people that is going to be reached by a more civil discourse. that is itself a conservative meme, something they wheel out after they poison the well over and over again.
the message 'conservatives' need to get is:
- cut the QAnon pizzagate crap or go to prison
- get vaccinated or get fired
- your family is tired of your bullshit and is ready to send you to a mental hospital
take, for example, a conservative that's 50+ years old.
what made them who they are? maybe leaded fuel, drinking, maybe they were abused. who knows. a longwinded chat about lipid nanoparticles isn't going to fix that.
Just tell them to get vaxed or get the fuck off your lawn
"informed consent" is me informing you that you are making the choice to get the fuck out of my life if you bring any of your conspiracy theory bullshit to my house
ppl that say: "we could persuade antivaxers if we were more polite & careful about presenting info" are themselves antivax & precisely the sons, daughters, cousins, husbands, wives that other people have already given up on
that's why they all have <5 follows on here
if a dude on twitter has less than a dozen followers and wants to tell you how *persuasive* he believes Trump is or make some other weird pedantic/meta point with you, then you're just wasting your time. may as well argue with street preachers. fun to do but dumb.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Eric Weinstein denounces Bret Weinstein's ivermectin bullshit
Eric Weinstein is some version of neuroatypical so he needs to explain what should have been a basic point about masks (Masks aren't necessary = "Don't buy N95s right now please") or vaccines (Vaccines are safe = "Vaccines are statistically safer than covid") into a million words
I don't want to call Eric Weinstein an exhausting autistic idiot (as i'm woke & don't want to say all autistic people share Eric's failings) but charitably to Eric these are just basic uses of English that take him months to wrap his head around & it kills people in the meantime
Heather Heying fails at reading again. People are increasingly worried about the unvaccinated plague rats
& unmasked Delta transmission breeding more variants, and Heather Heying somehow interprets this as a victory for her being unvaccinated in Portland
Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying are perversely insisting that unnamed scientists advertised the vax as future proof (this never happened), while they keep refusing to elaborate on their prophylaxis protocol & their absurd interpretation of vaccine safety
if it happens that a Delta 2.0 defeats the vaccine completely, Bret Weinstein will just say the vax made it even though the simplest explanation is that population breeds mutation.
Weinstein needs a more complicated answer that fits his conspiracy theory
remember: on Monday, response from Bret Weinstein will be 3 weeks late.
We still don't know if he believes ivm is also a treatment, minimum prophylaxis dose he thinks effective, why he dismisses all the negative ivm meta-analyses & which interpretation of VAERS data he's using
Bret Weinstein, please:
Is ivm a treatment? Phil Valentine is dying
Which ivm schedule is effective? we're still waiting
Which ivm studies are legit? Cochrane review is out & you said nothing
What VAERS signal are you talking about? hopefully not McLachlan & Seneff's rants
these are 4 simple questions.
Bret Weinstein has a PhD
Heather Heying has a PhD
two PhD's, and they still can't answer these four simple clarifying questions with a few paragraphs.
"Make sure you have your vitamin D3 level checked. [...] And then have a doctor on speed dial that will write you a prescription for ivermectin"
Phil Valentine is now on a ventilator, and has been in the hospital since July 16th.
Phil Valentine's bro Mark: "97% of the people in hospital have not been vaccinated. That ends the discussion for me." & says Phil is most pro-vax person now.
Phil chose to take ivermectin instead, a snake-oil pushed by Bret Weinstein, Pierre Kory, Robert Malone & Tess Lawrie
While the video says that Phil Valentine does not require a ventilator, a day or two after the video production date news reports came out that Phil has since been put on one
for the hundredth time, it would be easier to evaluate @BretWeinstein's claims if he just bothered to write the article he promised to publish on July 12th.
Not only does Bret Weinstein demonstrate that he doesn't really care about anyone's time when he procrastinates like this, it also shows that he does not really give a fuck about the pandemic generally