Heather Heying fails at reading again. People are increasingly worried about the unvaccinated plague rats
& unmasked Delta transmission breeding more variants, and Heather Heying somehow interprets this as a victory for her being unvaccinated in Portland
Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying are perversely insisting that unnamed scientists advertised the vax as future proof (this never happened), while they keep refusing to elaborate on their prophylaxis protocol & their absurd interpretation of vaccine safety
if it happens that a Delta 2.0 defeats the vaccine completely, Bret Weinstein will just say the vax made it even though the simplest explanation is that population breeds mutation.

Weinstein needs a more complicated answer that fits his conspiracy theory
The study authors have repudiated Bret Weinstein / Heather Heying's interpretation of the study
Bret Weinstein & Heather Heying could take this moment to say something completely uncontroversial - for example, "vaccinated people should wear masks" - however their patrons are both mask adverse and vaccine adverse, so stating something so factual would be financial suicide
instead of

"Vaccination is not enough by itself to stop the spread of variants, study finds"

perhaps a better title would have been:

"Vaccine hesitancy combined with relaxed restrictions make variants more likely"

The vaccine hesitant are the problem, not the vaccinated.
Vaccines have clearly lowered mortality by an extreme degree, this alone is enough to argue for their universal use. If *quick adoption* of the vaccine also totally obliterates COVID, that's great! If *slow adoption* just makes it endemic, then the *slow people* are the problem
The problem is that these *slow people* are the first to throw up their hands and say "but you promised the vaccine would end the virus!". This is a lie about what vax experts have said, a misreading of the situation, and also proving that these people are 'slow' in many ways

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with uberfeminist

uberfeminist Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @uberfeminist

31 Jul
Eric Weinstein denounces Bret Weinstein's ivermectin bullshit
Eric Weinstein is some version of neuroatypical so he needs to explain what should have been a basic point about masks (Masks aren't necessary = "Don't buy N95s right now please") or vaccines (Vaccines are safe = "Vaccines are statistically safer than covid") into a million words
I don't want to call Eric Weinstein an exhausting autistic idiot (as i'm woke & don't want to say all autistic people share Eric's failings) but charitably to Eric these are just basic uses of English that take him months to wrap his head around & it kills people in the meantime
Read 14 tweets
30 Jul
it's funny how a lot of 'intellectual dark web' adjacent dingdongs keep telling us how to convince Trump supporters to switch & how to convince antivaxxers to not be antivaxxers and how to convince QAnon people to not be QAnon people.

it's all bullshit. i'll tell you why
i used to be 1 of those people that often said "I'd be more woke if *this specific person* wasn't such a crazy idiot"

as long as I'd already made this bogeyman to oppose & put them on a fake pedestal (such as 'emperor of all public schools'), my mind was never going to change.
what changed my mind on all the 'woke' business was all the 'anti-woke' people showing their true colors as a bunch of lazy crybabies as all the 'woke' people consistently showed up.

nobody wants to be on the same side as a bunch of losers.
Read 10 tweets
29 Jul
remember: on Monday, response from Bret Weinstein will be 3 weeks late.

We still don't know if he believes ivm is also a treatment, minimum prophylaxis dose he thinks effective, why he dismisses all the negative ivm meta-analyses & which interpretation of VAERS data he's using
Bret Weinstein, please:

Is ivm a treatment? Phil Valentine is dying
Which ivm schedule is effective? we're still waiting
Which ivm studies are legit? Cochrane review is out & you said nothing
What VAERS signal are you talking about? hopefully not McLachlan & Seneff's rants
these are 4 simple questions.

Bret Weinstein has a PhD

Heather Heying has a PhD

two PhD's, and they still can't answer these four simple clarifying questions with a few paragraphs.
Read 10 tweets
29 Jul
this tweet is so fucking funny, it is the ultimate "You don't need to buy me dinner but I do need to eat tonight" tweet
You don’t need to persuade me that the earth isn't flat. I just need 3 things:

1. first class ticket to Australia
2. Postcards from every country
3. A flight on Jeff Bezos' rocketship
Read 7 tweets
29 Jul
"Make sure you have your vitamin D3 level checked. [...] And then have a doctor on speed dial that will write you a prescription for ivermectin"

Phil Valentine is now on a ventilator, and has been in the hospital since July 16th.
Phil Valentine's bro Mark: "97% of the people in hospital have not been vaccinated. That ends the discussion for me." & says Phil is most pro-vax person now.

Phil chose to take ivermectin instead, a snake-oil pushed by Bret Weinstein, Pierre Kory, Robert Malone & Tess Lawrie
While the video says that Phil Valentine does not require a ventilator, a day or two after the video production date news reports came out that Phil has since been put on one
Read 4 tweets
28 Jul
recall after Elgazzar was retreated, Tess Lawrie's analysis of prophylaxis ivermectin used by Bret Weinstein relied on Chahla 2021 & Shoumann 2020

Cochrane Review included a Shoumann paper, but dumped Chahla as it was not RCT & used cocktail treatment

cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.10… Image
for the hundredth time, it would be easier to evaluate @BretWeinstein's claims if he just bothered to write the article he promised to publish on July 12th.
Not only does Bret Weinstein demonstrate that he doesn't really care about anyone's time when he procrastinates like this, it also shows that he does not really give a fuck about the pandemic generally
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(