A thousand cuts.

I think the way Trump is most likely to be brought down is through thousand small cuts, each seemingly undramatic.

In lots of small ways, the legal walls are closing in on Trump.

🔹The DOJ ordered the IRS to release his taxes.

1/
🔹The DOJ is refusing to defend Mo Brooks in his lawsuit about inciting the insurrection, which means they'll also refuse to defend Trump.

🔹Trump is being criminally investigated for that phone call to Georgia.

🔹Now Congress is looking into this:



2/
🔹The Trump Org is under indictment. He has loans coming due.

🔹His pick for the Texas election lost.

The list goes on and on.

A thousand cuts is probably better because one dramatic flourish allows him to build sympathy and present himself as a martyr.

3/
I see a lot of cynicism on left-leaning Twitter.

"It's about time."
"He gets away with everything. Rich White guys always do."

Me with my squirt gun of truth: "not ALWAYS. Be accurate!"

Don't be cynical. Due process takes time. Investigations take time.

4/
We're transitioning from a country in which white men dominated all of our institutions toward a functioning multi-racial secular democracy.

I used to say "fully functioning" multi-racial secular democracy but no institutions run by humans ever run perfectly.

5/
He may stop being a threat, but the threat of right-wing extremism isn't going away.

The 1930s fascists were brought down in flames (literally, their endings were quite dramatic) but fascism never went away.

It mutated and back in a new form.
The problem was that he was shielded by a major political party, including the Senate.

The failure was in the Republican Party.

They chose to shield a lawbreaking president.

Institutions can't be any better than the people who form them.
The Constitution provides a remedy for a lawbreaking president: The House impeaches. The Senate convicts and removes.

After the president is removed, the Constitution specifically says that the president can then be tried in a criminal court.
Things went wrong at the Senate trial stage.

The Constitution also provides a remedy for Senators who don't do their jobs and refuse to convict when they should: Vote them out.

The buck stops with the voters.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

1 Aug
The Republican leadership is literally cultivating a lawless, rule-breaking base bent on undermining the government.

Here⤵️I rely on scholarship from sociology and an analysis of the groups that make up the Republican coalition to explain why.


1/
Here's a transcript if you prefer to read: terikanefield.com/why-they-are-a…

Also, the video itself contains a transcript.

After I refill my ☕️ I'll come back and attempt a concise Twitter summary.

2/
It should be obvious that the Republican leadership is deliberately cultivating a lawless, rule-breaking base bent on undermining the government, but I'll attach some evidence . . .

3/
Read 16 tweets
29 Jul
Here's how sociologists describe what's happening.

The scholarship cited is here: asanet.org/authentic-appe…

A "crisis of legitimacy" [a group no longer believes the government is legitimate] happens when . . .

1/
🔹One or more social groups experience a “representation crisis” because the political establishment doesn't appear to govern on its behalf, or

🔹An incumbent group experiences a “power-devaluation crisis” when the political establishment appears to favor . . .

2/
. . . new social groups over established groups.

That's fancy language for "they don't like the fact that Blacks, women, and other minorities are moving into positions of power."

When groups don't believe the political establishment has legitimacy, they seek to destroy it.

3/
Read 7 tweets
28 Jul
Chris Christie said something similar last week. He said Republican voters don't want to be "indoctrinated" by the government.

The Republicans are literally cultivating a lawless base bent on undermining the government.
"Normal" is intolerable to them.

That's why they want to destroy the political establishment.

Since 1954, "normal" is a nation moving steadily toward a multi-racial democracy.

They don't think a multi-racial government represents them or is legitimate.
Read 4 tweets
28 Jul
It's also bad news for Trump, who no doubt planned to make the same argument.

(The defense is that the speech these guys gave on Jan. 6 was within the scope of their employment so they're entitled to the DOJ defending them. The DOJ said nope.)
Here's the document: s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2101…
The DOJ is calling his activities "campaigning and electioneering," which isn't part of his duties as a Congressman.

Also "it is no part of the business of the United States to pick sides among candidates in federal elections."

🔥
Actually, Trump did make the same argument in this case.

The 14th Amendment (which says that any elected officials who incite insurrection can not run again for office) creates an interesting loop.

If they are guilty of what they're charged with, the DOJ can't defend them.
Read 5 tweets
27 Jul
The full [completely crazy] argument appears to be that Pelosi allowed the insurrection to happen because it would benefit her politically.

Riiiight. Victims generally allow themselves to be brutally attacked because they know it will make their attackers look bad. [sarcasm]🙄
This is what will circulate on right wing media.

People outside of the right wing media bubble need to understand how off-the-rails insane this party has become.

What kind of a mind can even think that up?
After the insurrection, they mede the decision to shield Trump because he controls the "base" and without his "base" they can't win primaries.

Some of them believe every word of this.
Others have made a cynical and ugly political calculation.
Read 4 tweets
25 Jul
Republican Lawbreaking

Have you noticed that Republicans don't mind if their leaders break laws?

In fact, conviction can be a badge of honor in the fight against “liberal corruption.” h/t @michaelscherer
washingtonpost.com/powerpost/crim…

Here, I explain why:
1/ I’ll post a transcript shortly. (Having technical difficulties.)

Republican crimes (and criminology in general) is a huge topic, but here are a few thoughts.

I’ve been tweeting about a lot of this, but I think laying it out this way helps me explain it better.
2/ Putting the blame where the blame belongs: Turns out, it wasn't a technical difficulty. It was me being a computer dork. (No! It was keyboard gremlins making mischief!)

Here's the transcript: terikanefield.com/republican-law…
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(