Dream show to write for, for each decade. I was not alive in the 70s but that's where the two nested below started so I did the same

1970s: Land of the Lost
1980s: Dungeons & Dragons
1990s: Highlander: The Series
2000s: Justice League
2010s: The Tick
2020s: Star Trek Lower Decks
If I could do just one episode of Lower Decks, it would be about washing hands and other hygiene issues, with a soupçon of the implications of superscience on medical technology.
The two things that convinced me that the Lower Decks people are deeply in touch with the Star Trek lore were a throwaway reference to handwashing and Boimler angsting over the idea of washing out and being shipped off to a research asteroid.
Handwashing episode overview: Boimler discovers a subculture within Star Fleet of people who wash their hands because even though they know there's biofilters everywhere "it just feels gross" and also weird space germs constantly get through the biofilters anyway.
Boimler is conflicted because on the one hand relying on the futuristic science wizardry is just how it's done in the 24th century and he hates to rock a boat, but the idea of spending thirty seconds to be extra clean deeply appeals to his nerdy and correct soul.
He gets discovered washing his hands by Mariner and breaks down pleading for her not to say anything and talking himself around to proud defiance and demands to let the chips fall where they may, mystifying her because she's always washed her hands without making a big deal of it
Episode ends with Mariner mentioning it obliquely to Freeman, wondering if she was the weird one for washing her hands, and they start talking about other people they know definitely do it.

"Wait, did white people just stop washing their hands?"

"How far back did this happen?"
Also, the secret society of handwashers tells their story to Boimler after he threatens to turn them in because he immediately jumps to the conclusion that they're time travelers from the past when he sees them washing their hands.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alexandra Erin

Alexandra Erin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AlexandraErin

31 Jul
Ancillary thread spilling off my Discworld one gave me a shot of perspective on something I've always felt and couldn't put into words why until now:

Bugs Bunny dressing up as a woman to fool men never feels like the typical "man in dress" transphobic pantomime farce to me.
I mean, right on the face of it, it's a stock transphobic comedy trope: man in dress coming onto presumed straight man, fooling him for antagonistic purposes, sometimes to the point of a wedding.
I think the reason it doesn't feel the same to my (and I'm not arguing with anyone who doesn't like it or has a stock rule of "cis guys in dresses for a joke is always transphobic and I'm never down with that"; that's entirely valid) is... well, that'll be in the next tweet now.
Read 19 tweets
31 Jul
I regret to inform you that I can explain exactly how TERFs read Discworld as an anti-trans text, because of course I can.

If you post as to debate these points, I may block you if it comes off like you think I'm defending/agreeing with them.

Short answer: we're the dwarves.
In the tervish reading of Discworld, the dwarves are a logical endpoint of a "transhuman" cult in which gender replaced sex and then everybody opted to be male because patriarchy. Cheery isn't a trans icon to them; she's an Adult Hu... er, Dwarven Female who recognizes biology.
Since the Dwarves who "recognize biology" (though we have no more idea what's under Cheery's skirt than we know what's going on with any dwarf deep down) are presented as sympathetic and the Dwarves who "replace sex with gender and abolish womanhood" are not...
Read 13 tweets
31 Jul
The Alexandra Meal at McDonald's is enough boxes of McNuggets to be four more than you can actually comfortably eat, a milk shake, and a thing of fries you don't actually enjoy because you forgot they got rid of the trans fats in a move that is both transphobic and fatphobic.
Also sometimes you get the warm, fresh chocolate chip cookies and think about how much you miss those really crisp boxes of prepackaged chocolate-ish chip cookies they used to sell, which probably also had partially hydrogenated oils in them.
Any more than four and it's another meal for later. Any less than four and it's too easy to push on and finish them anyway. It's just dead center of the awkward in-between zone.

Read 5 tweets
30 Jul
Wild how many of these out-of-nowhere allegations of child trafficking involve little blonde white girls in the company of relatives who are people of color or ethnic minorities. It's a pattern that predates QAnon but I wonder how much all the QAnonsense exacerbates it.
To believe in QAnon is to believe that millions of children are being trafficked, all the time, everywhere, in plain sight, to the point that it's probably not a question of "Is it happening on my flight?" but "Who on this flight is trafficking, and who is being trafficked?"
I don't want to erase the racism here; to see a pale little blonde girl with a Black woman and think, "Obviously the child doesn't belong with her and obviously she is dangerous to the child" is racism from start to finish, and inventing crimes to excuse that reaction is, too.
Read 4 tweets
30 Jul
Okay, IANAL (and also, I'm not a lawyer) but I see a lot of people in comments reacting to the filing's description of allegations as "facts" and "factual" as though they constitute an admission that the allegations are true, and I'm afraid this is overly optimistic.
"I'm just sharing my opinion on your character" is a pretty good defense against defamation in the land of the free and the home of the et cetera. Free speech is protected after all, and everyone's entitled to their opinion.
So if you're saying, "Just my opinion, but I think he's a scumbag in my opinion because he spiked my drink and tried to take me home, and that's my opinion" and the scumbag's lawyer says you're making factual statements, they mean "statements as to what the facts are".
Read 8 tweets
29 Jul
So she's not satisfied with the number of people her vaccine fearmongering will kill directly. She's trying to encourage some random homicides on top of that.
Honestly, when it comes to Marjorie The Gathering, I would imagine that the death of government representatives by gun-wielding "patriots" is not an unforeseen consequence but her best case scenario.
Because first of all, it's going to spark an anti-gun backlash, which always makes for good business for gunthumpers like the NRA and her.

And second of all, it helps her spin the outreach program as evil and coercive: why would people open fire if they were just talking?
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(