I’ve read Stanley, and about this period. I understand about analysing people by their time and not ours. I know he said some things which were perhaps less racist than his contemporaries, and had mixed views for his time.
And yes he was a virulent racist and a fucking monster.
Study him by all means. Understand his views and the roles he played in history, most definitely. Put him on a literal pedestal? I think not. For he was a shit. In any age.
I now await Team ‘everyone was racist then’.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ok cos I can’t watch the #LionsTour2021 on holiday, I’ve found an Mills and Boon novella and by god it’s hot. Nikki and Carter are playing strip poker. Carter is trying to resist. But this is only going one way.
Wait, encased?? Do breasts tighten??
‘It wasn’t quite a gasp, but it wasn’t normal breathing either.’ Covid? Carter needs his inhaler.
ScarJo doing her thing as usual, Florence Pugh is amazing, MOROCCO BUDAPEST THE RED ROOM!al A touch of Bond, and Bourne, and the Winter Soldier. Litre bit of Third Act Marvelitis, but done well.
And a chief baddie who ruins girls’ lives, steals their futures, controls the world, and couldn’t look more like Harvey Weinstein if he tried.
I wrote a feature for the Mail on Sunday about human evolution, including the latest findings about the big headed Chinese/Maguire skull from last week, and general debunking of some of the simplistic old narrative of humankind's journey.
The Mail's outlook is generally far from aligned with my own, but I saw this as an opportunity to do some science communication to a large new audience. It was a pleasure working with the editor.
I did request that we use humankind - as we have been in science for many years now - and not mankind, but they didn't change that, which I regret.
@TinaLasisi Of course, the relationship between scientific racism and swimming is deep. The myth of buoyancy due to <something something> bone density is commonly held, and used to explain the stark absence of black swimmers at all levels of swimming competence.
In fact, the reasons why far fewer black people in the USA can swim are entirely socioeconomic: pools were built in white areas after legal segregation ended in 64; no role models, no parents who swim.
An interesting tale of science communication, journalism and the culture wars has just dropped - 🧵
@JenniferRaff@ewanbirney@aylwyn_scally@minouye271 + I recently published a paper about the lexicon of genetics, and how it needs to be addressed bit.ly/3ddQu96
We argue that certain terms are confusing, scientifically invalid, and some are wedded to the racist history of our field.
Last night, the Telegraph published a hit piece on it bit.ly/3xWvPOI
...which misrepresents the arguments, misquotes the paper, and spells two of our names wrong. Nice work.
I wonder if this might be some latent revenge, as I have a previous run in with the author over some of the most comically wrong reporting of a science story ever
New paper klaxon! @JenniferRaff@ewanbirney@aylwyn_scally@minouye271 and I have been working on this a while: sparking a conversation about the lexicon of genetics, which continues to utilise scientifically redundant, confusing and racist terminology.
We’re definitely not prescribing or policing language, but want to prompt a dialogue with colleagues in similar and adjacent fields about our terminology m, datasets and tools, and move towards a lexicon that both serves the science and frees us from a racist past.
This is to be a conversation, so please please please let us know what you think. This is a preprint, it is also in with a journal, but this is a community effort to move genetics forward. 🧬