Share this page!

Maybe Scrolly?
Dr Adam Rutherford Profile picture
Twitter logo
31 Jul, 9 tweets, 2 min read
Ok cos I can’t watch the #LionsTour2021 on holiday, I’ve found an Mills and Boon novella and by god it’s hot. Nikki and Carter are playing strip poker. Carter is trying to resist. But this is only going one way.
Wait, encased?? Do breasts tighten??
‘It wasn’t quite a gasp, but it wasn’t normal breathing either.’ Covid? Carter needs his inhaler.
Her trousers were history.

Wait what she has freakishly long legs.
Now THIS is how you write a cliffhanger.
You want some more?
I’ve missed a key detail. Nikki has kidnapped Carter. He is only reluctantly participating in this poker game to get her drunk enough that she falls asleep. Spoiler: it doesn’t work.
The burping radio was her boyfriend interrupting for some reason. They get back on it immediately after the burp. But…
I don’t think they stretched properly. Post coital lolz
There’s no more nookie. They do some stock market trading and then get married. Disappointing.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Dr Adam Rutherford

Dr Adam Rutherford Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AdamRutherford

Dr Adam Rutherford Profile picture
31 Jul
Also Stanley:
I’ve read Stanley, and about this period. I understand about analysing people by their time and not ours. I know he said some things which were perhaps less racist than his contemporaries, and had mixed views for his time.
And yes he was a virulent racist and a fucking monster.
Study him by all means. Understand his views and the roles he played in history, most definitely. Put him on a literal pedestal? I think not. For he was a shit. In any age.
Read 4 tweets
Dr Adam Rutherford Profile picture
7 Jul
#BlackWidow is SUPERB.
ScarJo doing her thing as usual, Florence Pugh is amazing, MOROCCO BUDAPEST THE RED ROOM!al A touch of Bond, and Bourne, and the Winter Soldier. Litre bit of Third Act Marvelitis, but done well.
And a chief baddie who ruins girls’ lives, steals their futures, controls the world, and couldn’t look more like Harvey Weinstein if he tried.
Read 5 tweets
Dr Adam Rutherford Profile picture
4 Jul
I wrote a feature for the Mail on Sunday about human evolution, including the latest findings about the big headed Chinese/Maguire skull from last week, and general debunking of some of the simplistic old narrative of humankind's journey. HUMANKind
The Mail's outlook is generally far from aligned with my own, but I saw this as an opportunity to do some science communication to a large new audience. It was a pleasure working with the editor.
I did request that we use humankind - as we have been in science for many years now - and not mankind, but they didn't change that, which I regret.
Read 4 tweets
Dr Adam Rutherford Profile picture
30 Jun
Hmmm, this looks a lot like scientific racism to me. paging @TinaLasisi for her take.
@TinaLasisi Of course, the relationship between scientific racism and swimming is deep. The myth of buoyancy due to <something something> bone density is commonly held, and used to explain the stark absence of black swimmers at all levels of swimming competence.
In fact, the reasons why far fewer black people in the USA can swim are entirely socioeconomic: pools were built in white areas after legal segregation ended in 64; no role models, no parents who swim.
Read 5 tweets
Dr Adam Rutherford Profile picture
26 Jun
An interesting tale of science communication, journalism and the culture wars has just dropped - ​🧵
​@JenniferRaff @ewanbirney @aylwyn_scally @minouye271 + I recently published a paper about the lexicon of genetics, and how it needs to be addressed
bit.ly/3ddQu96
We argue that certain terms are confusing, scientifically invalid, and some are wedded to the racist history of our field.
Last night, the Telegraph published a hit piece on it
bit.ly/3xWvPOI
...which misrepresents the arguments, misquotes the paper, and spells two of our names wrong. Nice work.
I wonder if this might be some latent revenge, as I have a previous run in with the author over some of the most comically wrong reporting of a science story ever
Read 10 tweets
Dr Adam Rutherford Profile picture
21 Jun
New paper klaxon! @JenniferRaff @ewanbirney @aylwyn_scally @minouye271 and I have been working on this a while: sparking a conversation about the lexicon of genetics, which continues to utilise scientifically redundant, confusing and racist terminology.

arxiv.org/abs/2106.10041
We’re definitely not prescribing or policing language, but want to prompt a dialogue with colleagues in similar and adjacent fields about our terminology m, datasets and tools, and move towards a lexicon that both serves the science and frees us from a racist past.
This is to be a conversation, so please please please let us know what you think. This is a preprint, it is also in with a journal, but this is a community effort to move genetics forward. 🧬
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @AdamRutherford has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @AdamRutherford!

Read all threads by @AdamRutherford

:(