Huge red flag! State-owned TV just posted a new cringeworthy "patriotic song" about defeating the enemies of the people. Very reminiscent of old regime propaganda and aesthetics. But hey, state-owned TV never made its own revolution. Another sector that evaded reform.
Here's the link to the video. The usual technical amateurism of state-owned TV: mono sound, they forgot to include the track on the right channel. Some things never change. facebook.com/TVN.Tunisie/po…
Nadia Akacha, the President's Chief of Staff shared this on her Facebook page.
Akacha actually posted this on her profile before national TV uploaded it, which suggests that the Presidency might have commissioned the song.
Counter-productive! People in the comments find it reminiscent of old regime kitsch propaganda.
This reminds me of the stuff that happened invariably every time I worked on international development projects with a comms budget. Tunisian government partners always wanted to divert some funds to produce this kind of kitsch patriotic song clips or create ugly mascots.
You might think that Nadia Akacha is quite young, but career civil servants of her generation are the worst in terms of comms. Old regime naïveté, paternalism, and aesthetics are so ingrained in their software that it's become bloody hardware.
Once, a senior official drew this sketch in one the most cringeworthy moments in my career. He wanted it to be the logo for a government-sponsored youth project. Here's the exact reproduction with annotations:
So this is an anthropomorphic map of Tunisia. The face is the flag of Tunisia. The head of course wears the inevitable chechya (a traditional hat). The Cap Bon coastal region represents Tunisia's hand trying to catch young people in the sea, migrating to Italy or Syria.
And instead of the Jerid salt lake in the middle, he wanted an eye. "The eye that sees." That part seemed really important to him and he insisted a lot about this.
Unpopular opinion: In 2021, a state doesn't need a state-owned TV. Abolish Watania 1 & 2 aka TV7! Just replace them with Parliamentary TV - that is if we ever have a functioning parliament again.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
President Kais Saied is tackling a key issue all governments have failed to address: Phosphate production in #Tunisia. Social unrest is often blamed for shutdown of phosphate production and the role of corruption in disrupting phosphate production is often overlooked.
Before the revolution in 2011, #Tunisia was one of the world's top exporters of phosphate. The country's now importing phosphate.
Protests aimed at a fairer distribution of phosphate export revenue to the local population have indeed disrupted production. The revolution of 2011
can actually be placed on a continuum originating in the 2006 uprising in phosphate-rich #Gafsa. But beyond these legitimate grievances which have yet to be addressed, high-scale corruption is also to blame.
One of the key players in this dossier is the Tahya Tounes MP Lotfi Ali
As I stated earlier this is quite obviously a coup from my point of view. I won't blame anyone, foreign or Tunisian, for using this term. However, foreign occasional observers of Tunisia have had kneejerk reactions, relying on fetishist, inappropriate frameworks
to tell Tunisia's story. What's missing is often a genuine interest in understanding the context that led to them coup and what might be it's consequences, and what it might mean to diverse Tunisian actors with variegated interests and perspectives.
All I've seen is Thomas Friedman-style analogies, narrow perspectives, cheap activism by bystanders with no skin in the game. But it was to be expected. (Western) journalism, policy-making and academia are less and less about understanding and more and more about pedantic memes.
A lot of people have been referencing this thread to claim that most Twitter activity in relation to the events in #Tunisia is the work of Emirati, Egyptian and Saudi bots. This provides valuable data but it suffers from selection bias. Let me explain 🧵
Marc did a great job mapping and analysing Twitter disinformation and propaganda, inauthentic coordinated behaviour originating in the UAE-Egypt-KSA axis. The way this study is presented suggests that these countries are behind most disinfo/propaganda about Tunisia.
Marc himself acknowledges that the scope of this study was narrow and not "agnostic," and he is preparing a wider upcoming study which looks at Tunisia-related activity by diverse actors. But his data is being used by Ennahdha, and Qatari and Turkish actors to support a narrative
Well, I argue that before the 25th Tunisia didn't have a functioning parliament. The overwhelming majority of legislative activity consists of ratifications of international treaties, most of which are loan agreements. Most substantive pieces of legislation
and the underlying policies are drafted and/or initiated by international donors and international NGOs. Parliament has been unable to perform its monitoring mission and effectively check the executive.
Every single time Parliament launched an investigation into corruption, incidents, government abuse, policy failures the investigative committees were dead-born. Never investigated anything seriously, never published any conclusions.
I would take this with a grain of salt. This is a Qatari propaganda outlet that has repeatedly engaged in the spreading of disinformation about Tunisia in recent years. Without evidence, the article is relaying rumours which originated in pro-Qatar circles that Kais Saied
received support from 300 Egyptian security officers dispatched by Sisi. Those officers, according to the article, assaulted PM Mechichi in the Presidential Palace. I find it really hard to believe. Not the least because Mechichi is not the kind of guy who'd oppose any resistance
but also because I don't see why President Saied who commands the Tunisian Armed Forces, a sizeable, well-trained and equipped Presidential Guard, and has gained some moral authority over the Ministry of Interior would need 300 Egyptian thugs.
The CEO of the state-owned TV had refused access to two talk show guests, a leader of the journalists' union and the VP of the Human Rights League. He claimed that he was obeying instructions from a general. Both the Presidency and the MoD denied having issued such instructions.
The CEO of the National TV had been appointed by Prime Minister Chahed and is believed to have ties to Ennahdha.
The two guests were eventually allowed into the studio and took part in a frank debate about the situation. This contradicts rumours that this was part of an attempt
to shut down all political discussions on state-owned TV.