President Kais Saied is tackling a key issue all governments have failed to address: Phosphate production in #Tunisia. Social unrest is often blamed for shutdown of phosphate production and the role of corruption in disrupting phosphate production is often overlooked.
Before the revolution in 2011, #Tunisia was one of the world's top exporters of phosphate. The country's now importing phosphate.

Protests aimed at a fairer distribution of phosphate export revenue to the local population have indeed disrupted production. The revolution of 2011
can actually be placed on a continuum originating in the 2006 uprising in phosphate-rich #Gafsa. But beyond these legitimate grievances which have yet to be addressed, high-scale corruption is also to blame.

One of the key players in this dossier is the Tahya Tounes MP Lotfi Ali
Soon after the 25th of July, unconfirmed rumours started to circulate about the arrest of this MP. If he hasn't been arrested, President Saied is certainly going to make a move against him soon. He mentioned him - without naming him - in two videos since the 25th.
Lotfi Ali is in the transport business. The problem is that transport of phosphate is normally done by rail through a state-owned company, while Lotfi Ali has a fleet of trucks. Ali is being accused of having sabotaged the railroad repeatedly, destroying rails to
bully the phosphates company into requiring his road transport services. Sabotage is not his only method. Bribery and corruption too. He was deeply entrenched in politics. He funded President Caid Essebsi's Nidaa party which nominated him as MP.
By the end of the previous legislature, when the tide was turning against Caid Essebsi, Lotfi Ali played a key role in enabling the rise of Tahya Tounes, a Nidaa offshoot led by the then-PM Youssef Chahed.

Chahed had gained popularity by launching a "war on corruption"
He used the military tribunal to prosecute and arrest Chafik Jarraya, one of Nidaa's key donors who is involved in smuggling. But it quickly became clear that Chahed's war on corruption only targeted his political foes. When he founded Tahya Tounes, he enlisted some of
Tunisia's most corrupt businessmen/politicians, including Lotfi Ali but also smuggling baron Kamel Hamzaoui from Kasserine. They are now MPs for Tahya Tounes, they barely set foot in parliament but nonetheless enjoyed immunity until Saied took it away.
These people's track-record may partly explain why most Tunisians see parliament as a failed institution and a refuge for the most corrupt, and why people have welcomed the lifting of parliamentary immunity. Parties offered nomination (therefore immunity) to organised crime lords
Saied is expected to move against Lotfi Ali very soon. The national company has already re-started shipping phosphate by rail and Saied has hinted at a return to full production. This might be seen as a positive signal by international financial institutions.
Tunisia has been losing about USD 1 billion annually due to disruptions to phosphate production.
The question is how far is Saied's war on corruption will reach? It is very reminiscent of Chahed's: same reliance on military justice, same rhetoric, same popular relief. But will this be a comprehensive and indiscriminate war on corruption or will he be content with eliminating
those who stand against him? He already proposed a way to deal with pre-2011 corruption (corrupt buisnesspeople to fund infrastructure in marginalised areas or be prosecuted), but it is unclear how he will deal with post-2011 corruption which isn't smaller in scale.
Anyway if you're interested in Saied's rhetoric on this topic, you can find his latest video here. He addresses a young anti-corruption activist from Gafsa who also contributed to his electoral campaign. facebook.com/27117857294020…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Habib M. Sayah 𐃏

Habib M. Sayah 𐃏 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rhizomyx

1 Aug
#MustRead

As I stated earlier this is quite obviously a coup from my point of view. I won't blame anyone, foreign or Tunisian, for using this term. However, foreign occasional observers of Tunisia have had kneejerk reactions, relying on fetishist, inappropriate frameworks
to tell Tunisia's story. What's missing is often a genuine interest in understanding the context that led to them coup and what might be it's consequences, and what it might mean to diverse Tunisian actors with variegated interests and perspectives.
All I've seen is Thomas Friedman-style analogies, narrow perspectives, cheap activism by bystanders with no skin in the game. But it was to be expected. (Western) journalism, policy-making and academia are less and less about understanding and more and more about pedantic memes.
Read 4 tweets
31 Jul
Huge red flag! State-owned TV just posted a new cringeworthy "patriotic song" about defeating the enemies of the people. Very reminiscent of old regime propaganda and aesthetics. But hey, state-owned TV never made its own revolution. Another sector that evaded reform.
Here's the link to the video. The usual technical amateurism of state-owned TV: mono sound, they forgot to include the track on the right channel. Some things never change. facebook.com/TVN.Tunisie/po…
Nadia Akacha, the President's Chief of Staff shared this on her Facebook page.
Read 11 tweets
29 Jul
A lot of people have been referencing this thread to claim that most Twitter activity in relation to the events in #Tunisia is the work of Emirati, Egyptian and Saudi bots. This provides valuable data but it suffers from selection bias. Let me explain 🧵
Marc did a great job mapping and analysing Twitter disinformation and propaganda, inauthentic coordinated behaviour originating in the UAE-Egypt-KSA axis. The way this study is presented suggests that these countries are behind most disinfo/propaganda about Tunisia.
Marc himself acknowledges that the scope of this study was narrow and not "agnostic," and he is preparing a wider upcoming study which looks at Tunisia-related activity by diverse actors. But his data is being used by Ennahdha, and Qatari and Turkish actors to support a narrative
Read 37 tweets
29 Jul
Well, I argue that before the 25th Tunisia didn't have a functioning parliament. The overwhelming majority of legislative activity consists of ratifications of international treaties, most of which are loan agreements. Most substantive pieces of legislation
and the underlying policies are drafted and/or initiated by international donors and international NGOs. Parliament has been unable to perform its monitoring mission and effectively check the executive.
Every single time Parliament launched an investigation into corruption, incidents, government abuse, policy failures the investigative committees were dead-born. Never investigated anything seriously, never published any conclusions.
Read 5 tweets
28 Jul
I would take this with a grain of salt. This is a Qatari propaganda outlet that has repeatedly engaged in the spreading of disinformation about Tunisia in recent years. Without evidence, the article is relaying rumours which originated in pro-Qatar circles that Kais Saied
received support from 300 Egyptian security officers dispatched by Sisi. Those officers, according to the article, assaulted PM Mechichi in the Presidential Palace. I find it really hard to believe. Not the least because Mechichi is not the kind of guy who'd oppose any resistance
but also because I don't see why President Saied who commands the Tunisian Armed Forces, a sizeable, well-trained and equipped Presidential Guard, and has gained some moral authority over the Ministry of Interior would need 300 Egyptian thugs.
Read 9 tweets
28 Jul
The CEO of the state-owned TV had refused access to two talk show guests, a leader of the journalists' union and the VP of the Human Rights League. He claimed that he was obeying instructions from a general. Both the Presidency and the MoD denied having issued such instructions.
The CEO of the National TV had been appointed by Prime Minister Chahed and is believed to have ties to Ennahdha.

The two guests were eventually allowed into the studio and took part in a frank debate about the situation. This contradicts rumours that this was part of an attempt
to shut down all political discussions on state-owned TV.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(