I have read this book, and I think everyone who is interested in the recent history of the Labour Party will find it rewarding. In particular, it is a valuable resource for tracing the development of the anti-Semitism controversy and allegations over the last 5-6 years. 1/6
The author's position is clear: he is solidly committed to putting the case for Chris Williamson. I should say at once that I have been very critical at times of Mr Williamson's approach, which has seemed a bit blundering. I think Mr Garratt is more forgiving than many. 2/6
But the book is by no means all about Mr Williamson; it takes on almost all the issues around alleged Labour Party anti-Semitism, and gives a valuable view of them which is not often seen outside left and Labour left circles. There is also much material... 3/6
...in the book which I have not seen before. There is a very interesting section on the Gilad Atzmon petition which examines the common misconception that Chris Williamson signed the petition. The suspensions and Mr Williamson's responses are documented in full. 4/6
There is thorough documentation of Jeremy Corbyn's record in opposing anti-Semitism and affirming the rights of Jewish people. In short, although the partisan nature of the book is clear, it is a hugely important historical document from which all can benefit. Please read. 5/6
Mr Garratt (@dayofthemutant) : fasten your seatbelt. You are in for a bumpy ride. But best wishes, and thank you for an important work. :D 6/6

@DerbyChrisW @citizentommy @jeffweston1970 @ThinkwellBooks #labour #LabourParty #antisemitism

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with leftworks #WeAreCorbyn #IStandWithJeremyCorbyn

leftworks #WeAreCorbyn #IStandWithJeremyCorbyn Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @leftworks1

2 Aug
Dr Piers Robinson's @Wikipedia page is being deliberately and viciously targeted by editor "NomdeA", whose interests are startlingly similar to those of "Philip Cross", who is banned from such editing. @PiersRobinson1 1/

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:C… Image
"NomdeA" is only active a few times a month or less, most usually to attack someone of whom the Western establishment disapproves. There have been four edits of @PiersRobinson1's page thus far, apparently still going on. 2/ Image
"NomdeA" attempts to insinuate again the unsubstantiated allegation, denied by Dr @PiersRobinson1, that he left Sheffield University due to a furore over his alleged support of conspiracy theories. "NomdeA" has attempted to get this allegation into @Wikipedia before. ImageImage
Read 8 tweets
2 Aug 20
So. Whatever anyone may think of him, @MaxBlumenthal has published articles in the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times. This is indisputable fact.

As these are prestigious journals, his @Wikipedia article, not unnaturally, mentioned them. See here.

en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti…
Would you like to see evidence that @MaxBlumenthal has written for the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times? Here you are.

nytimes.com/2009/09/03/opi…

latimes.com/archives/la-xp…
This is, apparently, not good enough for @Wikipedia narrative manager "Philip Cross". He doesn't want anyone to know from Wikipedia that nasty anti-Western crank @MaxBlumenthal has in fact written for prestigious mainstream media publications. So he deletes the details.
Read 9 tweets
14 Jan 20
Wikipedia administration idiot-in-chief User:JzG [Guy] blunders into the Philip Cross BLP discussion with irrelevant and insulting remarks and a heap of blatant prejudice. How this person ever got to be a @Wikipedia admin is a mystery.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia…
"Being attacked by a subject of an article you've already edited doesn't constitute a COI."? Yes, fine. What Philip Cross has done is the exact reverse - gone and edited the @timand2037 and @AbbyMartin articles in a hostile manner *after* their tweets regarding him.
Even Philip Cross supporter NedFausa is disturbed by this behaviour. It is also at present an action for which Philip Cross has not even attempted a defence.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk…
Read 4 tweets
6 Sep 19
REPOST. Okay. So I had a closer look at this "report", including following the hyperlinks. I'd like the University and others to pay particular attention to this paragraph. @EdinburghUni

@Tim_Hayward_ @PiersRobinson1 @Tracking_Power @McCormack_Tara @MaxBlumenthal @KitKlarenberg
There are at least four things wrong with this. Firstly, the words "has also claimed on his blog" include a hyperlink. That link does not, in fact, go to Tim Hayward's blog. @EdinburghUni

@Tim_Hayward_ @PiersRobinson1 @Tracking_Power @McCormack_Tara @MaxBlumenthal @KitKlarenberg
That's deceitful, giving the incorrect impression that the link goes to Professor Hayward's own words. Instead, it goes to the notorious Times article of 14 April 2018. @EdinburghUni

@Tim_Hayward_ @PiersRobinson1 @Tracking_Power @McCormack_Tara @MaxBlumenthal @KitKlarenberg
Read 15 tweets
26 Apr 19
I've been looking a little more closely at #PhilipCross's recent antics regarding the @guardian article on Paul Manafort and Julian Assange on @Wikipedia.

I vaguely recall that Mr Cross is highly protective of the Guardian, for some reason. Maybe others can help me on that.
The @wikipedia article Mr Cross is editing on this is that of @ggreenwald, a U.S. writer. However, the Guardian is a British newspaper, reporters are British, and the Embassy involved is in London. It therefore could not be clearer that this is a ban violation from Mr Cross.
To begin with, I will simply present the original paragraph and Mr Cross's edited version, side by side.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(