It's a bit off topic but my recent glacier hike reminded me of how quickly glaciers are disappearing.

And it's a shame cause they are incredible.

So just a little reminder of how bad things are.

/1
In the last 100 years, Alpine glaciers lost over 50% of their surface area. And this process is accelerating.

Some studies suggest that there won’t be any glaciers below 3500m by 2050.

/2
One of the best examples is another famous glacier - Mer de Glace in Chamonix.

Just look at how quickly it's disappearing

(Source: chamonix.net/english/news/m…)

/3
And here.

30 years.

/4


rfi.fr/en/france/2019…
And it's not just the Alpine glaciers of course. It's everywhere.

I went to Vatnajökull in Iceland in 2007. The second time in 2017. The difference was shocking. And then there is Greenland.

livescience.com/greenland-mass…

/5
The implications of this are obviously massive, for the climate and for the planet.

But it also just makes me really sad that these stunning places are disappearing.

6/6

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr Anna Jerzewska

Dr Anna Jerzewska Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AnnaJerzewska

21 Jul
A longish 🧵on the "Northern Ireland Protocol: the way
forward" which could also be referred to as NI Protocol: an afterthought

As always focus on customs and border solutions.

/1


assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
The first part is a long explainer of “how we got here” where the UK Gov attempts to explain and justify the circumstances that led it to sign an international agreement that it now wants to change.

/2
The second part "how the Protocol is working" is where the Gov expresses its surprise with the fact that putting up a customs and regulatory border leads to an additional, significant burden for traders and trade diversion.

/3
Read 23 tweets
19 Jul
Based on a comment from @CaptainSwing666 probably worth explaining - no red tape will be slashed and trade with these countries won't be less bureaucratic.

It will be just as bureaucratic as trade with everyone else (cause it has to be).

Here is what can change:

/1
Based on DIT documents:

- tariffs could be removed or lowered on products that still have them
- rules of origin could be simplified (always a plus)
- simpler origin and certification provisions
- wider origin cumulation

/2
- improved and clearer rules on product and country graduation

Here is what won't change:

/3
Read 6 tweets
17 Jul
In keeping with the tradition of NI solutions next week's announcement promises to raise a lot of questions.

/1

rte.ie/news/2021/0717…
How will goods "clearly going to the South" be determined?

If by that the UK Gov means goods that are transiting NI to ROI, that's not simply a new way of interpreting and implementing the Protocol.

/2
But even more importantly, in that case, you would end up with one system for tariffs and one for border controls.

/3
Read 7 tweets
9 Jul
Substantial changes to the way US Customs approaches non-preferential rules of origin.

/1


sidley.com/en/insights/ne…
Instead of the standard "substantial transformation" (a bit vague), NAFTA Marking Rules could be applied to products from Canada and Mexico to determine non-pref origin.

/2
If adopted (currently a proposal) it would prevent dual origin status - something we've seen on occasions.

A similar approach has been applied to all textile products imported from all 3rd countries. So this would the next step in the same direction.

/3
Read 4 tweets
8 Jul
Watching Rt Hon Brandon Lewis and Rt Hon Lord Frost talk about the NI Protocol.

None of the consequences listed should come as a surprise to a Gov that's done its due diligence on the Protocol before signing it.

/1


policyexchange.org.uk/pxevents/brand…
Lord Godson's comment that the integrity of SM and NI's position in the UK's internal market are hard to reconcile is spot on. This is exactly where the difficulty is. That is why this was always going to be a difficult process and why there aren't any easy ways out of this.

/2
It's a shame there isn't a bit more transparency around this process. Lewis mentioned a number of UK proposals that the EU did not engage with.

Is that the Trusted Trader?

/3
Read 6 tweets
3 Jul
The issues around the NI Protocol come back to the 80:20 rule:

If you don't do it right and only spend 20% of the time negotiating, you'll spend 80% of time implementing and fixing.

Look at the language here

/1

irishtimes.com/opinion/david-…
"We expected", "we assumed".

Did you not have any conversations about how it would look in practice? What facilitating trade means and what cheks can be simplified?

Why not?

/2
The requirement to treat the movement of goods into Northern Ireland as if they were crossing the EU external border is implied in the Protocol and results from applying customs legislation to NI and placing the border in the Irish Sea.

/3
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(