It's geometry homework! It's a SWOT analysis! No, it's the 2021 @Gartner_inc Magic Quadrant® for Cloud Infrastructure and Platform Services! Let's make fun of it.
It goes alphabetically and thus begins with @alibaba_cloud. "Strong in China," "actually makes money" and whatever the hell this is count as their strengths.
Cautions for @alibaba_cloud are "weak in not-China," "local competitors and also geopolitics," and "lack of transparency" that includes both discounting and technical details of service implementations.
Next up we have @awscloud. Strengths include "they buy a lot of components so their supply chain is solid," "companies make large financial commitments to them," and "leader in innovation" because someone at @gartner_inc really trusts the re:Invent keynote slide deck.
Cautions for @awscloud include "sales pressure to increase commitment by 20% in order to renew existing contracts" which... isn't particularly new to us?
This is how Gartner says "perhaps 17 ways to run containers on AWS is a few too many:"
And the last caution is "services are bare-bones at launch." This includes IaaS and managed databases create a misleading halo effect for other offerings such as @awscloud Outposts, which have only experienced "modest traction." Ouch. Burn.
Next we have @googlecloud! Strengths include "increasing revenue," "growing enterprise mindshare," and whatever the hell "innovation velocity" is. They get special mention for how fully featured their Kubernetes service offering is.
The @googlecloud weaknesses are "postsales customer satisfaction is crap," "they're offering huge discounts but don't expect them to last," and "they lose breathtaking amounts of money every year."
Next up is @IBMcloud. Hoo doggy, let's take on our first Niche Player.
Strengths include "corporate restructuring," "focusing on regulated industries who can't easily leave," and "edge computing" because they were really stretching for a third strength.
Cautions include "market share" which is sad, "competitive pressure" since other vendors are a lot more nimble, and "clients view IBM as a legacy provider" because despite a large marketing budget, customers still in fact have eyes.
Next on the list is @azure. @gartner_inc identified strengths as being "broadly appealing" across the gamut--and tag in Visual Studio (they probably mean VS Code) and GitHub as examples of this. Also strong enterprise relations, and data services adoption.
Cautions include "#hugops is great but @azure feels like it breaks all the time," "your licensing is actively customer hostile with its complexity," and "lack of novel innovations." @Gartner_inc is not pulling punches on this one.
Next up, @OracleCloud! Strengths include "Market Responsiveness" which means "they're catching up quickly," "all of Oracle's aaS services are dogfooding OCI," and "distributed cloud" which is a full on-prem set of every cloud offering--that one's unique in the industry.
Cautions for @oraclecloud include "nascent adoption" because so many capabilities are new (and Oracle customers aren't that quick to adopt new things), "people despise Oracle as a company," and "heavy focus on lift-and-shift of existing Oracle workloads."
Next @Gartner_inc puts its two cents in on @tencentcloud. Strengths include "Digital Transformation" with just boilerplate, "Large Deployments" because large Chinese banks use them, and "Investments" which grasps at the "they have a region in Russia" straw.
Cautions for @tencent include "International presence" because 1/3 of regions are operated by a partner; 2/3 of regions have one AZ.
"Regional Disparity" because only the regions in China have all the bells and whistles.
And "Narrow Ecosystem" because MSPs rarely support them
Okay then--that's the runthrough. No vendors were added or dropped this year.
Here's the list of what you must offer in order to to be included in this list:
The good folks at @gartner_inc note that 90% of worldwide public cloud is concentrated in just four providers. They're keeping an eye on China though.
I suspect the actual adoption stories here are "people mostly want VMs and a couple of other baseline offerings."
And that more or less sums up the report; it's briefer than in previous years.
Remember, when you're in high school you make your decisions based upon what the cool kids say; once you grow up that doesn't change, the cool kids just now all work at @gartner_inc.
I'm Corey Quinn; more analysis on this market to come in a week or so at @LastWeekinAWS; subscribe now if you haven't already because although @Gartner_inc doesn't evaluate on this criteria, we have a platypus who reads your letters.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So you might think that I'd turn this into a database joke, but it gets at something more interesting: the philosophy of failing over. A thread informed by Ancient Sysadmin Wisdom!
Back in the Olden Days of Datacenters, when sysadmins knew C, "serverless" meant that Dell hadn't shipped an order on time, and "Kubernetes" held as little meaning as it still does today, the question of how to keep sites up and running in highly available configurations arose.
It turns out that in single data center environments, you'd have all kinds of equipment; "phantom" routers (a fancy word for "standby") that checked constantly to see if the primary was offline; if so it would self promote.
It’s high time @PolyworkHQ added some features. A thread…
Let me endorse people for things. When they're late to a meeting with me, I can endorse them for "time management." Rude to me on Twitter? You're now a Sharepoint expert.
Offer more clarity in badges. What category does unpaid emotional labor fall under?
An observation on legacy: I have never once heard a story about Jeff Bezos that made me say "he seems like a nice person."
@aselipsky? Too many times to count. @ajassy? Seen it myself firsthand.
But never Jeff.
You can never get a complete picture from the outside. I get that.
But you can absolutely get glimpses of the real person behind the public persona by talking to the people who've worked with them. Given enough data points, you can tie them together into a reasonable story.
The question is "how do you want to be remembered after you're gone?"
For me, I really hope the answer to that question isn't tied to my job, but instead the people I've encountered along the way.
I can't very well do it myself. At The @DuckbillGroup, our clients these days start at ~$1 million a month in spend or so. I'm very hesitant to give guidance to small accounts based upon what large ones are doing. It's a very slanted view of the industry!
That said, the data I'm seeing in here tracks with what I'm seeing in our client environments. As the post says, "this aligns with other cloud consulting organizations @getvantage has spoken to." We're one of them. They're spot on for the big items.