If they can censor your YouTube channel, they will censor your money.
@BretWeinstein@PierreKory@PanData19
The freedom fighters need censorship resistant money.
Here is how we did it.
Open access for everyone to follow.
We applied to a DAO to do this. @Dashpay was excellent to work with but in terms of fundraising, you can accomplish this by publishing any cryptocurrency address on a website you Control. Probably best to have the largest market cap coin involved (Bitcoin).
You will be successful but some safeguards are required to prevent people from spoofing your website to attract donations to a near identical address.
The methods section detailing how we did this included @ShapeShift_io. @ErikVoorhees has upgraded Shapeshift to cross chain atomic swaps run on Thorchain and is migrating to a DAO like structure.
This is only needed if you collect on multiple coins.
Not only is this is a clean mechanism to raise money,
It creates the framework for censorship resistant peer review. @goddeksineal and @BrendanEich have good perspectives on this.
Some of this was described at the @TexasBitcoin conference in 2018.
Fiat Science is the marketing arm of Fiat Money. You can’t fix one without fixing the other. @saifedean has a good book on Fiat Vs Bitcoin.
The way out of this pandemic is to defang the fuel to censorship which is fiat money. Take away the money machine and the monkey shit fight comes to an end.
But we must reboot science on chain with free market peer review systems to avoid this capture from ever happening again.
The other tools we need are public genomes of pharmaceutical power plants. Open source pharmaceutical libraries from Cannabis, Kratom, Psilocybe etc... are what Is required to defuse the fiat regulatory capture game driving the COVID lemming cult.
A few folks have asked me to comment on this.
I do not think this is evidence of authorities admitting to qPCR failure.
It is evidence of them attempting to clean up the market ...albeit on very slow timetables.
Let’s review...
The FDA has circulated a set of control templates. They started this in May 2020 and more than a year later we are seeing the results.
Good that they are doing. Bad that it’s enforced over glacial time scales during a pandemic.
No biggie...
Just shuttled some S genes around to see which ones will kill monkey cells.
Let’s do this in a BL2 lab over in China while it’s outlawed here in the States.
In all of my publishing career, I’ve never seen a paper get edited 5 years later to remove references and flip the meaning of critical sentences.
This is a panicked attempt to cover.
For the stats junkies out there trying to make sense of the Vax data.
Fauci used ‘Ethics’ as the excuse vax the control arm of the trial. Now your data is a mess of correlations confounded by age, prior immunity, testing frequency and politics.
Bart sends his love.
Fauci has a history of doing this.
His wife runs the Ethics committee at NIH. When ever he needs a scientific bail out, it becomes unethical to not do it.
See Remdesivir trial goal post shifting.
See HIV history.
Of course, by eliminating the control arm, everyone is left to draw correlations with uncontrolled data and this debate inevitably takes longer and is more controversial. This is a smoke grenade for the public and squid ink for the regulators trying to make sense of it all.
Must commend @infoecho@SethOregon@PhaseGenomics@MediGenomics@PacBio
This is pretty tight Hi-C map out of the gate for a genome. HiFi 20kb/13Kb library, assembled with Peregrine. HiC with Phase Genomics and we have 26 Scaffolds, many Tip to Tip. Psilocybe cubensis.
This is a chromatin capture Map of the genome of Psilocybe cubensis.
This is a method that cross links the protein spools that organize the chromosomes.
By doing so, you gain an understanding of which pieces of the genome are in proximity.
Each box in the Map with a hot diagnol line is a chromosome or arm of a chromosome.
The Credibility Trap.
When you want things to be true, you are most exposed to getting burned.
Let's examine the David Martin video that is going viral and see if it passes a few sniff tests.
Here is his dossier. f.hubspotusercontent10.net/hubfs/8079569/…
It makes two claims about collusion with the CDC and Ralph Baric.
1)CDC illegally patented the SARs virus
2)Ralph Baric locked up all research on the synthetic versions of these.
Let us look at the CDC patent.
CDC patent was filed in the US in 2003 before Myriad case law. This means Diamond vs Chakrabarty set the legal precedence and natural sequence was patent eligible under 35-US-101. This contradicts David’s claims.
Don’t believe me. You can look this up in the USPTO PAIR system.