A few folks have asked me to comment on this.
I do not think this is evidence of authorities admitting to qPCR failure.

It is evidence of them attempting to clean up the market ...albeit on very slow timetables.

Let’s review...
The FDA has circulated a set of control templates. They started this in May 2020 and more than a year later we are seeing the results.
Good that they are doing. Bad that it’s enforced over glacial time scales during a pandemic.
What’s in the panel?
Not much.
C19 and MERs.

At various concentrations.
The varying concentrations are blinded and help the FDA measure the Limit Of Detection (LOD) for the tests.

What’s not in the templates and makes these LODs worthless?

Human DNA for the internal controls.
If you measure your Viral LOD in absence of Human DNA, you get a fake a LOD as your primers will never see these conditions in reality.
Your primers may interact with human DNA and produce FP or FN as a result of this interference.
Likewise some kits rightfully target human DNA to normalize the swab to swab variance of sample collection.
This is usually a competitive amplification where you PCR reagents are in competition for reagents and your viral LOD is usually weakened as the assay also amps human DNA
LoDs should be measured with and without internal controls because the number change when amplifying multiple targets in a multiplex format.

Already there are several kit providers that failed to deliver results. These providers should be avoided.
If they can’t simply run these over simplified controls from the FDA after a year of scalping the market with high prices, they are frauds.

I do not see TIbMolBio in the FDA list?
Many asked why they are including flu.
This is a good idea.
You want both viruses targeted at the same time otherwise billing incentives screw this up.

Once a hospital gets a positive C19 test, they are not motivated to run a second test for influenza.
In many hospitals, C19 has better reimbursement and lower liability than Flu patients. Once positive for C19, additional costs for follow on testing can only make reimbursement and billing more complicated.

Better to understand co-infections/cross talk in a single test.
This also pushes testing providers to more thoroughly measure their assay cross talk with other viruses.

You can see late CT cross talk with influenza in a ring test run in Australia.
Multiplex testing would clean this up.

In summary,
It’s good they are doing this.
It’s bad it’s done so slowly.
It’s irresponsible they only have 2 targets in the panel and doubly irresponsible they are measuring LOD, without human DNA present.

Have a look at the large Variance in LoDs per test (100x)
Perkin Elmer wins with 180 copies.
Quidel loses with 540000 copies.

Such low limits of detection creates False Negatives (FN).
Track and Trace is useless with such high FNs and test heterogeneity in the market.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Kevin McKernan 🙂

Kevin McKernan 🙂 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Kevin_McKernan

22 Jul
Watch the long list of dishonest virologists shill for Tony to protect their field from getting hyper regulated and restricted.

This is protectionism.
No biggie...
Just shuttled some S genes around to see which ones will kill monkey cells.

Let’s do this in a BL2 lab over in China while it’s outlawed here in the States.
In all of my publishing career, I’ve never seen a paper get edited 5 years later to remove references and flip the meaning of critical sentences.
This is a panicked attempt to cover.
Read 9 tweets
21 Jul
For the stats junkies out there trying to make sense of the Vax data.

Fauci used ‘Ethics’ as the excuse vax the control arm of the trial. Now your data is a mess of correlations confounded by age, prior immunity, testing frequency and politics.

Bart sends his love.
Fauci has a history of doing this.
His wife runs the Ethics committee at NIH. When ever he needs a scientific bail out, it becomes unethical to not do it.
See Remdesivir trial goal post shifting.
See HIV history.

Of course, by eliminating the control arm, everyone is left to draw correlations with uncontrolled data and this debate inevitably takes longer and is more controversial. This is a smoke grenade for the public and squid ink for the regulators trying to make sense of it all.
Read 4 tweets
15 Jul
Must commend @infoecho @SethOregon @PhaseGenomics @MediGenomics @PacBio
This is pretty tight Hi-C map out of the gate for a genome. HiFi 20kb/13Kb library, assembled with Peregrine. HiC with Phase Genomics and we have 26 Scaffolds, many Tip to Tip. Psilocybe cubensis. Image
This is a chromatin capture Map of the genome of Psilocybe cubensis.

This is a method that cross links the protein spools that organize the chromosomes.

By doing so, you gain an understanding of which pieces of the genome are in proximity.

Each box in the Map with a hot diagnol line is a chromosome or arm of a chromosome.
Read 4 tweets
14 Jul
The Credibility Trap.
When you want things to be true, you are most exposed to getting burned.

Let's examine the David Martin video that is going viral and see if it passes a few sniff tests.
Here is his dossier.
It makes two claims about collusion with the CDC and Ralph Baric.
1)CDC illegally patented the SARs virus
2)Ralph Baric locked up all research on the synthetic versions of these.

Let us look at the CDC patent. Image
CDC patent was filed in the US in 2003 before Myriad case law. This means Diamond vs Chakrabarty set the legal precedence and natural sequence was patent eligible under 35-US-101. This contradicts David’s claims.
Don’t believe me. You can look this up in the USPTO PAIR system.
Read 34 tweets
13 Jul
The Rage Quitter Cancel Cult has outdone themselves again.

The most frightening aspect of this story is the journals willingness to violate its own code of ethics to lay sacrament to the vax god.

Still waiting for a coherent argument for retraction. All arguments seem to stem from correlation isn’t causation.

Or the database isn’t trustworthy.

Fair point that would induce word smithing not retraction according to the journals code of ethics.
The fact that the Adverse Events Database isn’t trustworthy, isn’t the authors fault.

The fact that people insist the jab is safe while admitting the Database is broken is cognitive covidissonance.

Why else collect the data?
Read 5 tweets
1 Jul
Time for another Truman Show, Only this time Truman is wearing a Nerd Sweater.
Many of you probably witnessed the 6 MDPI editor rage quit this the weekend over this manuscript that attempted to look at adverse events of the experimental shot that shall not be named.
The knee jerk reaction from Team Panic was that MDPI was a Predatory Journal and the paper should be retracted, censored, sworn at, and ejected into space, never to return.

Then this crowd began to realize all of their Vax-Pimp hero's were on the editorial board.
Oops Image
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!