As @ruthbenghiat explains in her book on Strongmen, autocrats and would-be autocrats tend to come to power when they have the backing of conservative "elites."

They tend to lose power when they lose the backing of the conservative elites.
So just as these conservative elites are at least partly responsible for the fact that Trump came to power in the first place, it's also true that his coup failed because enough of them put on the breaks.

This was written by a Republican:
What I've noticed over the past 5-6 years is that different Republicans / conservatives have reached their limit at different points.

The Never-Trump conservatives jumped ship in 2016.
Others, not until after the Big Lie.
Others, not until after the insurrection.

Some. . .
. . . seem to have no bottom at all, like @EliseStefanik and others.

Some seem to revel in seeing how low they can go and how much ugliness they are capable of.
Actually, I'd like to make a correction to an earlier tweet.

The coup failed PARTLY because enough of the conservative "elites" put on the breaks.

The rest of us play a part in all of this as well.

Biden won by enough of a majority that Trump had an uphill battle.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

4 Aug
My latest for the Washington Post:
washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/0…

Trump's lawyer made a short statement about why the IRS shouldn't have to hand over Trump's taxes to Congress.

That statement contained 4 huge errors.

I explained the errors.
(Who's thinking: "Wait. Only four?"🤣)
Ha. Well. Trump's lawyers now filed in court. The doc is here: cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2021/image…

The original complaint is here: waysandmeans.house.gov/sites/democrat…

Hmmm ... did they make the same bogus arguments to a judge?

reading now . . .
Basically, they're just denying that Congress has a valid legislative reason for requesting the taxes.

Trump is on extremely weak footing and I don't expect this to go far.
Read 8 tweets
1 Aug
The Republican leadership is literally cultivating a lawless, rule-breaking base bent on undermining the government.

Here⤵️I rely on scholarship from sociology and an analysis of the groups that make up the Republican coalition to explain why.


1/
Here's a transcript if you prefer to read: terikanefield.com/why-they-are-a…

Also, the video itself contains a transcript.

After I refill my ☕️ I'll come back and attempt a concise Twitter summary.

2/
It should be obvious that the Republican leadership is deliberately cultivating a lawless, rule-breaking base bent on undermining the government, but I'll attach some evidence . . .

3/
Read 18 tweets
30 Jul
A thousand cuts.

I think the way Trump is most likely to be brought down is through thousand small cuts, each seemingly undramatic.

In lots of small ways, the legal walls are closing in on Trump.

🔹The DOJ ordered the IRS to release his taxes.

1/
🔹The DOJ is refusing to defend Mo Brooks in his lawsuit about inciting the insurrection, which means they'll also refuse to defend Trump.

🔹Trump is being criminally investigated for that phone call to Georgia.

🔹Now Congress is looking into this:



2/
🔹The Trump Org is under indictment. He has loans coming due.

🔹His pick for the Texas election lost.

The list goes on and on.

A thousand cuts is probably better because one dramatic flourish allows him to build sympathy and present himself as a martyr.

3/
Read 9 tweets
29 Jul
Here's how sociologists describe what's happening.

The scholarship cited is here: asanet.org/authentic-appe…

A "crisis of legitimacy" [a group no longer believes the government is legitimate] happens when . . .

1/
🔹One or more social groups experience a “representation crisis” because the political establishment doesn't appear to govern on its behalf, or

🔹An incumbent group experiences a “power-devaluation crisis” when the political establishment appears to favor . . .

2/
. . . new social groups over established groups.

That's fancy language for "they don't like the fact that Blacks, women, and other minorities are moving into positions of power."

When groups don't believe the political establishment has legitimacy, they seek to destroy it.

3/
Read 7 tweets
28 Jul
Chris Christie said something similar last week. He said Republican voters don't want to be "indoctrinated" by the government.

The Republicans are literally cultivating a lawless base bent on undermining the government.
"Normal" is intolerable to them.

That's why they want to destroy the political establishment.

Since 1954, "normal" is a nation moving steadily toward a multi-racial democracy.

They don't think a multi-racial government represents them or is legitimate.
Read 4 tweets
28 Jul
It's also bad news for Trump, who no doubt planned to make the same argument.

(The defense is that the speech these guys gave on Jan. 6 was within the scope of their employment so they're entitled to the DOJ defending them. The DOJ said nope.)
Here's the document: s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2101…
The DOJ is calling his activities "campaigning and electioneering," which isn't part of his duties as a Congressman.

Also "it is no part of the business of the United States to pick sides among candidates in federal elections."

🔥
Actually, Trump did make the same argument in this case.

The 14th Amendment (which says that any elected officials who incite insurrection can not run again for office) creates an interesting loop.

If they are guilty of what they're charged with, the DOJ can't defend them.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(