Very early numbers starting to come in from #OH11 via NYT Image
1% reporting, Brown off to a nearly 4000 vote lead on Turner. #OH11 Image
5.7% precincts reporting, Shontel Brown up roughly 3,700 votes on Nina Turner in #OH11 via WaPo. Image
13.9% precincts reporting, Shontel Brown maintaining a roughly 3,600 vote lead on Nina Turner in #OH11 via AP. Image
19.5% precincts reporting, Shontel Brown currently leads Nina Turner by just over 3,500 votes (10 pts) in #OH11 (via AP) Image
25.2% precincts reporting, Shontel Brown still up approximately 3,600 votes on Nina Turner in #OH11 (via WaPo) Image
27.6% precincts reporting, Shontel Brown leads by 3,700 over Nina Turner in #OH11 (via WaPo) Image
35.5% precincts reporting, Shontel Brown leads Nina Turner by roughly 3,500 votes in #OH11 via WaPo. Image
41.5% precincts reporting, Shontel Brown keeping up an approximate 3,600 vote lead over Nina Turner in #OH11 (via WaPo). Image
53.8% precincts reporting, Shontel Brown holding onto a roughly 3,300 vote lead over Nina Turner in #OH11 (via WaPo) Image
62.2% precincts reporting, Shontel Brown maintains a lead of just under 3,200 votes on Nina Turner in #OH11 (via AP) Image
75.7% precincts reporting, Shontel Brown keeps a 3,000 vote lead on Nina Turner. (via AP)

I haven't seen an official call yet, but I'd imagine that's about it. Image
My mistake, AP called it quite a bit ago.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Robbie Jaeger 🔎

Robbie Jaeger 🔎 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RobletoFire

17 Jul
Key points not in the story that are worth mentioning:

1. Donor data for DMFI PAC beyond 01/25/21 (GA Special Election) isnt yet public.

2. As of 01/25, DMFI had $101K cash on hand—yet they've spent $660K against Turner, so there is new money (which Schusterman could still be).
There's a reason why I haven't reported this yet, even though these numbers have been available since February.

Nearly all the money Schusterman gave DMFI was spent BEFORE their recent blitz against Turner—so we can't say for sure she's the donor behind it, though she may be.
Assuming DMFI is a semi-annual filer with the FEC, we'll know for sure who funded their recent blitz on Nina Turner on 07/30.
Read 4 tweets
23 Feb
Lately I've been trying to just ignore all of the so called "in-fighting", keep my head in the research, and focus on what's important: the work.

But my patience has worn out.

If you come at me or my colleagues with bad faith attacks or outright lies, I will expose you.
It's so easy to sit around and creep @nikoCSFB or @Fiorella_im's timeline and disparage their work.

It's much more difficult to do some work of your own.

"Those who can't talk about those who can".
Challenge my reporting if you want but I don't report without receipts. I pride myself on it.

I don't need an entire team of researchers to write a "breaking" story about something that's been known for years, and I don't take credit for scoops that I didn't report first.

IYKYK
Read 9 tweets
23 Feb
The mainstream media is going to keep Trump in the spotlight as long as they can—because he made them stars pulling record ratings.

You wont see the same veracity of reporting on Biden, because criticism of Democratic politicians in those circles will get you blacklisted.
Eventually, they'll have no choice but to put Biden in the spotlight. When that happens, much like with Obama, it will be milquetoast puff pieces full of softball questions.

Then their ratings will bottom out. Why? Because it's boring.

Then they'll invent their next boogeyman.
Don't forget the media's hubris helped push Trump to the forefront of politics, though their coverage was overwhelmingly negative—"Any press is good press".

Plus, he was good for business!

They'll repeat the cycle when they soon become attention starved from his absence.
Read 4 tweets
28 Jan
BIDEN CABINET FINANCIALS MASTER THREAD:

This will be a catalog of the incoming Biden administration's financial disclosures and relevant data/stories—several of which were first reported by us here @McscNetwork.

Thread begins below👇
1. ANTONY BLINKEN, SECRETARY OF STATE

Blinken's most prominent business ventures came from @WEAdvisors, a consulting firm he co-founded, which paid him $1.2M+ to consult for:
@McKinsey
@Microsoft
@blackstone
@boeing
@GileadSciences
@ATT
@RBC
@SoftBank
@Uber
@FedEx
Blinken also started a venture capital firm focused primarily on defense contractors—Pine Island Capital Partners—with Michéle Flournoy (future Defense Sec. Austin sat on the board).

Pine Island has pledged to capitalize on their newfound access. access
dailyposter.com/p/breaking-pot…
Read 22 tweets
13 Jan
BREAKING: Recent tax filings show @theintercept parent company, Pierre Omidyar’s @firstlookmedia, pulled in $28M+ in 2019.

$25M (over 88%) came from Silicon Valley Community Foundation, which receives funds from tech billionaires like Dustin Moskovitz and Jeff Skoll.
This total is slightly lower than 2018, where @firstlookmedia took $31M+ from Silicon Valley Community Foundation, which I reported on earlier this year.

SVCF's 2 yr total is $51M+, making up practically all of First Look's funding during that span.
Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz's nonprofit "Good Ventures" raised $97M for the SVCF in 2018, before officially rolling under their umbrella.

Per the 2020 election cycle, Moskovitz gave $36M+ to pro-Biden SuperPAC "Future Forward", as well as $830K to Biden's Victory Fund.
Read 5 tweets
12 Nov 20
A 2019 report on Dominion Voting Systems' "Democracy Suite" by Texas SOS determined numerous vulnerabilities and issues in the software and hardware—such as convoluted setup, lost adjudication results, incorrect prompts, and power failures.

Certification was recommended denied.
After the examination ended in the recommendation of not certifying Dominion Voting's "Democracy Suite", further reports by Texas State Dept. questioned whether it was "suitable for its intended purpose" and if it "operated efficiently and accurately".

Certification was denied.
Texas officials reviewed Dominion's "Democracy Suite" on at least 6 separate occasions, all of them resulting in recommendations of not certifying it for use.

A compilation of these reports can be found here:
sos.texas.gov/elections/laws…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(