An importnat graph.

Can you see a trend? Image
Another way to visualize it:
independentsciencenews.org/commentaries/p… Image
This confirms the conclusion a paper by Ben Hu, Shi Zheng Li et al:

“SARSr-CoV evolution is strongly correlated with their geographical origin, but not host species.” (Hu et al., 2017)"

journals.plos.org/plospathogens/…
So let's see.

What should be the logical step right now to investigate the origins?

1. Invite scientists to come and sample in Yunnan and especially Mojiang, and release available sequences and sampling information, or
2. Block any access to the Mojiang mine, confiscate samples from the few Chinese scientists who somehow managed to get there, take all viral DBs offline and firmly tell the WHO to go sample elsewhere.

Well, you know the story.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gilles Demaneuf

Gilles Demaneuf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gdemaneuf

6 Aug
The irony is that this repeats word for word the Guangdong regulations of 2010. Image
It's just like a broken record.
See the article about the 2010 regulations from Guangdong:

"Some used laboratory animals are on the table, and no one knows what kind of experiments they have been used for."

translate.google.com/translate?sl=z… Image
For the Guangdong regulations (June 2010), see:
translate.google.com/translate?sl=z…
@ParkSuAm1996 @R_H_Ebright Image
Read 6 tweets
6 Aug
That very first picture of SARS-CoV-2 was taken on the 7th Jan 2020 by Song Jingdong (宋敬东), associate researcher at the Beijing Institute of Virology and a student of Hong Tao.
The Beijing Institute of Virology under precisely Hong Tao leaked SARS four times in 2004 (in total 11 cases, one dead, 1,000 people in isolation)

There was a cover up, the WHO was ejected from the investigation and Hong Tao was never blamed. Untouchable
gillesdemaneuf.medium.com/the-good-the-b…
But bad habits die hard, and as we just learnt a senior scientist got infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the Beijing Institute of Virology in Jan or Feb 2020.

Another SARS lab accident in the same lab. Nothing changes.

usrtk.org/biohazards/sen…
Read 4 tweets
4 Aug
Every day brings more nonsense in Chinese media.

They worked so hard to create a nice little story of immaculate infection via imported frozen food - good reason to fill rather disappointed that it did not catch up.

news.cgtn.com/news/2021-08-0…
“A recent study from the National Institutes of Health in the U.S. revealed that the coronavirus was already spreading in the U.S. in early December 2019 - a humiliating slap in the face for politicians who claimed they have enormous evidence the virus came from a lab in Wuhan” Image
That certainly deserves top marks for creative writing.

They nearly got there though.
They managed to get the perfect debilitating ToRs, hoodwinked a few well groomed useful idiots by claiming a moral high ground, and got the near perfect result from the China-WHO Potemkin tour. Image
Read 4 tweets
31 Jul
The fish fingers are back, courtesy of Goa, Hughes et al.
globaltimes.cn/page/202107/12…
This paper can be found below.
It actually says preciously little that is new - only puts a new twists on well known facts while ignoring the logical issues that the suggestions in the paper raise.

The poor pangolins are again rolled out for the purpose.
chinaxiv.org/abs/202107.000… Image
Let's start by what is clear and well accepted: the market was just an amplificator event, on line #2 of Wuhan tube.

An haplotype network shows that the samples isolated at the Huanan Seafood Market do not cluster the ancestral lineages - no jump to human there.
#DRASTIC Image
Read 15 tweets
30 Jul
Note the complete contradiction in this Chinese piece of propaganda: Image
So the databases were taken offline in 2019 after the outbreak of the pandemic, which was not even communicated to the WHO until the 3rd Jan 20, and for which there was actually about nothing known internationally until the 31st Dec 19.

These hackers clearly had a time machine.
As we now know, it is even worse because the databases were actually taken offline in Sep 2019.

2nd contradiction: as DRASTIC has always said, only the viruses that were the object of a scientific publication were released publicly in the DB. Everything else was not.
Read 6 tweets
25 Jul
Even if the webminar starts with the usual factual and logical fallacy ('zoonosis happens all the time, hence a research-related accident is much less likely'), it does improve much towards the end, especially thanks to @YanzhongHuang who inject a healthy dose of realism. Image
I still find it irritating though that @ggronvall brought up the political slant so much.

Sometimes it is better to just discuss the science and leave the politics to politicians.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(