If you ignore the ideological content of Jan 6 for a moment and look at the mechanics of the investigation, you get a good lesson in the threat social media poses to public protest. Retroactive forensic analysis in a surveillance society can have a powerful chilling effect
Two traditional aspects of protest are in tension—one is that it's a open display, and the other is that it's ephemeral. A world where police can track participants down years after the fact, maybe even after laws have changed, is a different world from one we've ever lived in
I think about this a lot in the context of Hong Kong, where someone was just put away for six years for displaying a political slogan that was chanted by millions of people over the course of 2019. That conviction wasn't retroactive, but it's just a small further step away.
A world where everything is remembered forever is unlivable.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Hungarians being anti-immigrant is a great historical joke, since they themselves arrived from God knows where in Siberia and spent a good century inflicting misery across Europe before they got their wiggles out and bunkered down in the most defensible terrain they could find.
This is the kind of place you choose to live when you're nomadic horsemen who came out of the east to sack the shit out of Europe and don't want the playbook flipped on you by the next horde. They even hired Germans to build cities in the high passes, for early warning!
The other historical joke is that no one benefitted more from multiculturalism, tolerance, and ethnic pluralism than the Magyars, who punched way above their weight in the Austro-Hungarian Empire.
Experts say descending elevator will continue to descend before it rises.
A bunch of Washington Post reporters who majored in English grasping for a way to explain that the pandemic is still getting worse, but not quite as quickly as it was before.
No one ever mentions that McCain was shot down while bombing a civilian target in a densely populated city. The secretary's tribute here to what has become an American military tradition is fitting.
The targets McCain and his fellow airmen bombed had no military value; they took place hundreds of miles from where American soldiers were fighting. The purpose of the bombings was to inflict suffering on civilians severe enough to put pressure on the North Vietnamese government.
If in 1967 North Vietnam had bombed a power plant in Oakland we'd consider it the greatest war crime since Pearl Harbor. (There was in fact a nice short story based on such a premise, but I can't remember the author's name).
There was a window of opportunity to make mask-wearing as apolitical as handwashing, but we missed it. And once an issue gets its coattail in the woodchipper of political polarization, it's all over. The process is social media driven, but how to mitigate it is our great crisis
The tendency is to blame "partisan politics", but people have always been opinionated and combative about political beliefs. It's the process of runaway polarization, where any issue fractures on party lines once it passes an internet event horizon, that is new and frightening
Dropping a brick of heroin on every doorstop would probably have been less damaging than giving people an always-on device that communicates news about the world through the people who matter most to them. But we YOLO'ed our way into this world, and now have to YOLO our way out
The Biden administration wants a billion dollars to begin to process Afghan citizens eligible for evacuation. This comes out to $50K per applicant, or about $40K more than airfare to the US along with a few grand to tide them over while finding a job. cnn.com/2021/07/26/pol…
Biden wants these Afghan heroes who helped us detained on military bases for reasons I still can't understand. The refusal to just grant them temporary resident status and welcome them into the United States is not just immoral and asinine, but is costing us money.
These special visa applicants are Afghans who speak English, understand America (kind of by definition) and are on track to become US citizens. At what point do we stop treating them like dangerous criminals, and let them settle with their families and send their kids to school?
Banning cryptocurrencies is a foolish idea; all we need to do is regulate the exchanges.
If people insist their play money is real, then make them do time in the real-world pokey for breaking any of the rules that govern doing stuff with money. It's a similar strategy to making your kid pay rent and utilities if they insist they be treated like an adult.
Banning cryptocurrency would only reinforce the cult's belief system. We should take advantage of the fact that the technology is completely unworkable, and let it die a natural death. Regulating the exchanges will protect civilians while the fanatics get their wiggles out.