Journalists (myself included) haven’t asked enough tough questions about forcing the previously infected to get vaccinated
Yes. I know. It’s recommended
But there’s clearly a level of protection & the assumption they’re massively contributing to spikes doesn’t seem to be true
To be clear…I’ll still follow the guidance that says previously infected are even better protected with one dose.
And I realize the logistics here wouldn’t be easy.
But I think it’s time we ask more questions.
Open to a (civil) discussion below.
I’m also wary of the numerous red herrings the anti-vax crowd has routinely thrown out.
Loads of people simply believed they had COVId, particularly early on. They’re now trying to suggest they’re good when they have no proof that they are.
Headline: If you're a glass half-full kind of person, it's not all bad news. Sure, patient count is up... again... but cases, while going up, still aren't spiking