“Hungary” is beginning to function for American conservatives like “Sweden” does for leftists: it’s their “we just wanna be like” country. Both are fantasies of decline and shirking responsibilities; both are based on willful misunderstanding of the nature of the United States.
For decades, Bernie-style leftists made recourse to “we just want to be like Sweden” when accused of being “socialists.” They don’t want, they say, the iron misery of the Soviet Union, not to mention North Korea. They only want welfare, high taxes, and social cohesion.
Hungary, in turn, appears “fascist” only to the most shrill neoconservative journalists. It’s a quite, conservative country, where racial tension is absent, the gay agenda is stalled and decades behind the West, and the public buildings are grand.
Let’s be honest, Americans view Hungary as a tourist destination: not as nice as Prague but a “must see.” Nice cities and churches, without the, you know, “urban” issues…
Both Sweden and Hungary reached their current situations and lifestyles by being pawns in the big imperial game of the 20th century: the U.S. vs. U.S.S.R.
Sweden was allowed to enter the End of History—of collapsing birth rates and Last Man-ness, but, yes, wealth and social cohesion—by living in the shadow of Washington, and thus having all the big questions answered for it (war and peace, friend/enemy, etc.).
Hungary took a different path. The greatest irony of the 20th century is that the Soviet Union—the godless, Marxist “evil empire”—protected the East from the ravages of liberalism, feminism, and Americanism, thus making the Soviet Bloc a place of longing for Americans.
America can simply not become these countries, Sweden or Hungary, as both exist only in its shadow. It would be like the New York Yankees deciding to ditch the Majors for the quaint certainty of a single-A team in the Hudson Valley.
Orban has engaged in a brilliant PR campaign, but he has also been quite explicit in saying that “Orbanism” is not for export, that he does not question the power of the EU, but simply wants to be left alone as a nice little country.
Orban himself remains a curious figure: a Protestant in a former Catholic stronghold and mostly non-religious country; a protégée of the Soros Free Society who expelled his tutors; a man promoting a nation-state, whose days of glory came when it was the seat of empire.
America being like Sweden or Hungary would mean, not merely higher taxes or less “woke” advocacy, but an abandonment of military commitments as well as the foundation of the America’s universal middle-class lifestyle: a global currency and massive financial sector.
None of this is going to happen. And the “we just wanna be like Hungary” fantasy isn’t very productive.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I’m much less offended by a “vaccine passport,” like what’s happening in NYC, than this bizarre obsession with masking children.
Vaccines have clearly worked. The data on masks overall is a bit dubious, due to a number of factors.
I’m fully vaccinated, and I’m generally fine wearing a mask when I go shopping or whatever. The issue is children.
The silver lining of Covid-19 is that for children, it really is “just the flu.”
I understand transmission, but it’s too much to expect 6-10 year-olds to wear masks properly, keep them clean, etc. More important, the psychological/developmental damage of masking at school is serious—and seems to not be taken seriously by the CDC making these recommendations.
For goofball conservatives, like JD Vance, tweets like this are catnip—definitive proof that White liberals are “the real racists” or “the real classists” etc. All this proves is that conservatives hold the ideal of anti-racism as more important than life or death.
Why dismiss and condemn a proposal, which would likely save lives, just because it might reinforce a stereotype—and one that’s not even terribly demeaning. (I, too, love fried chicken; I’ve never understood how this stereotype is in anyway insulting to Blacks.)
If you don’t want to publicly announce your vaccination status, that’s fine. Why claim, though, that doing so is a violation of “HIPA rights” or that your status is a deeply personal matter, akin to your sex life or some childhood embarrassment?
The irony is that Trump should get a tremendous amount of credit for the development of the vaccines. The least you could say is that they happened under his watch.
The reason why Trump, MTG, and Tucker all refuse to announce that they’ve been vaccinated, which they undoubtedly have been, is that the MAGA base has created a “shibboleth” around refusing the vaccine, one adjacent to bizarre conspiracy theories.
“Traditionalist Catholics” are horrified by the notion that they might have to receive the religion they’ve devoted their lives to in a language they actually understand.
“Trads” want “True Catholicism” to remain a vague, obscure, never-to-be-actualized, never to-be-questioned *thing* that they wave around as a counter-revolutionary force, a grand perversion, which stands for their (understandable) hatred of everything as it is.
I wouldn’t say that “True Catholicism” is an “idea” or “ideal” because it *is* the Roman Church, a real, existing institution, one that, in fact, operates quite swimmingly in the modern world these “trads” love to hate.
I have a certain appreciation and respect for this man's "damn the torpedos" attitude. What continues to annoy the hell out of me is conservatives either engaging in revisionism of Jan. 6 ("it was Antifa") or denial ("they were just tourists").
Yes, Jan 6 was buffoonish, delusional, and had no chance of success, but it was understood by many, maybe most, participants as a kind of "revolution," a means of securing the presidency for Trump. To deny this is simply to disconnect from reality in the name of partisanship.
J6 was, in its way, an insult to the grand tradition of *coups d'état*—it was comprised of goofballs acting like goofballs, getting fleeced by the grifters who organized it. It was not a tightly organized and disciplined action for the seizing power and legitimacy.
One of the most common defenses of Trump in the dissident sphere is that "he's got good instincts"—with that admission that he's out of his depth or constantly undermined by Jared, the media, Deep State, and GOP. But "Trump's heart," I was told, "was in the right place."
Here we have Exhibit A for such a defense. Trump tried to go full Ron Paul at the 11th hour—change the course of American history no less—but was prevented by his own incompetence and the Deep State dragging its feet.