@EducEndowFoundn Work on prior knowledge has a long history with foundations back to Plato and seminal work from the early C20th (Piaget, Vygotsky, Ausubel, Bruner). Little focus on this in the #ECF. Skewed focus alert: I know mainly about secondary science education…
#ECF: good in intention but too over-simplistic to operationalise without significant additions/modifications:
A: SUBJECT: Understanding curriculum content in some subjects requires a structured, hierarchical framework of conceptual understanding (e.g. maths and sci, esp physics, prim, sec and beyond). Other subjects (languages inc Latin! DT…) require other knowledge forms.
B: WITHIN SUBJECT not all knowledge is conceptual. In sci you have to know/describe phenomena and events before accounting for them conceptually. Eg describe structure of skeleton, know that density doesn’t affect rate of fall before giving a Newtonian account.
C1: COGSCI #ECF written using #CogSci lingo. No problem but it neglects DECADES of refinement about WHAT IS STORED and HOW (Piaget, Vygotsky etc). Scaffolding, anyone? Piaget/Ausubel showed subject specific ideas important. Piaget showed that some general abilities important.
C2: COGSCI No mention in #ECF of how everyday lang shapes response to new concepts introduced in teaching. Shut the door to keep the cold out? Up-down motion talked about differently from horizontal motion. Kids come to class fluent in everyday lang AND THEY NEED TO STAY FLUENT!
C3 Kids need to see the DIFFERENCE: phys expl is PARSIMONIOUS, and uses some NEW ENTITIES (force, friction). Vygotsky introduced SOCIAL to compliment COG, plus mechanism for transfer from soc to cog (scaffolding – Bruner). #SciEdRes moved on from simple mental models in late 80s
D1: CURRIC AND PED DESIGN: LOADS of empirical evidence from ma/sc about positive impact of curric and ped design to enhance kids’ learning drawing on the above. #CASE findings in 90s made front page of The Times!
D2 #CLIS and subsequent work reflected in curric/pedagogy across the globe. Some #KS3Strategy#NationalStrategy materials for sc/ma drew on this (I wrote some with colleagues) but they were trashed by @michaelgove in 2010. All forgotten in #ECF
E: 2 YEARS?! EC teachers can’t do all this in 2y along with all other aspects of prof l (behaviour, assessment etc)! Solution: find well designed examples addressing prior learning, unpack the basis of design, practice adapting for use. Eg #KS3Strategy, @BestEvSciTeach
F: VALUE ITT: ITT in England (in schools and unis) is a national asset – yet attacked and poorly funded. Doing the above wouldn’t be possible if the #ITTMarketReview isn’t modified.
If you've stuck with this - thanks!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh