A three ingredient recipe for keeping your human motivated.

Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being.

Paper #5 #30papers30days 👇
Here's how it opens: a joy to read.

"The fullest representations of humanity show people to be curious, vital, and self-motivated. At their best, they are agentic and inspired, striving to learn; extend themselves; master new skills; and apply their talents responsibly."
This paper is about our motivation and the conditions required to facilitate it. They identify three ingredients.

• Competence: I believe in my ability to do
• Autonomy: I am *choosing* to do it (even if it's painful)
• Relatedness: I matter to others
You're likely familiar with motivation's two varieties.

🍭 EXTRINSIC: doing something for an outcome. You know it's valuable/ best interests to do it, so you do it.

😌 INTRINSIC: self authored or self endorsed: the natural inclination to do things for the satisfaction of them.
Two people may have equal talent and equal belief in their abilities, but the person with the most intrinsic motivation will perform better, persist longer and solve problems more creatively.

But intrinsic motivation only flourishes in supportive conditions.
Making people feel their effort matters or that they are skilled is not enough. They must feel that their behaviour is self determined.

The authors repeatedly found that adding extrinsic rewards actually undermines intrinsic motivation.

For best results, be autonomy-supportive.
One way to increase autonomy and move from unwillingness to passive compliance to active personal commitment is by internalising and integrating it to your sense of self.

To understand these stages better, the authors introduced 'Organismic Integration Theory' (OIT).
0. Amotivation: going through the motions

1. External Regulation: to satisfy an external demand like a deadline for others

2. Introjected Motivation: you're really doing it for yourself to avoid guilt, demonstrate ability or for ego Image
3. Identified Regulation: consciously doing it because it is personally important to you and your values

4. Integrated Regulation: fully assimilated and congruent with your values and needs.

Note, this is still extrinsic because it is to attain an outcome rather than pure joy
5. Intrinsic Motivation: *satisfaction*

The best news is this is not a linear process you have to follow. At any point along this spectrum, you can readily internalise any of these states.

Personally, with an arduous task, I remind myself I don't "have to", I "get to" do it.
A string of studies show that greater internalising is associated with ⭐️ adherence to meds ⭐️ weight loss ⭐️ better grades ⭐️ physical exercise ⭐️ environmental activism ⭐️ better intimate relationships.
Light critique.
GOOD: beautifully written; excellently presented; mixed methods from survey to longitudinal to meta-analysis evidenced replication

BAD: few specific explanations of method

BETTER IF: more quantitative arguments
Source.
Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L., 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), p.68.

BIG shout out to @garethjharvey for this suggestion. It's a fantastic paper. Others welcome.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Fanner

David Fanner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @utterlydavid

5 Aug
Everyone agrees that the ability to understand (and therefore influence) systems is immensely powerful. But what is systems thinking in the first place?

A Definition of Systems Thinking: A Systems Approach by Ross Arnold & John Wade (2015).

Paper #4 #30papers30days 👇
This paper argues that to make Systems Thinking more understandable, a complete definition is required.

The dictionary says "a system is defined as a regularly interacting or interdependent group of items forming a unified whole."

Something more than a collection of its parts.
Early on, the authors realise that systems thinking is literally *a system for thinking about systems* Image
Read 11 tweets
4 Aug
If you're reading this, you're probably a semi-expert in behavioural economics. Today I read the granddaddy paper of our field: Prospect Theory.

Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk by Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky (1979)

Paper #3 #30papers30days 👇
This paper rails against Expected Utility Theory - the idea that we weigh all options up and choose rationally - and ultimately annihilates this idea.

This paper is about certainty. Our desire to pick options that are most certain, even if they are worse.
Certainty Effect. People overweight outcomes that are considered certain.

You could win some money here. Would you pick A or B?
A: $4000 with an 80% probability
B: $3,000 (100% probability)

80% go for B.
Read 13 tweets
1 Aug
To spread behaviour and start movements, you should be careful about targeting central hubs.

Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties by Damon Centola (2007). A summary and light critique.

Paper #1 #30papers30days
Most behaviour spreads through social contact. Weak ties - people you barely know - easily spread viruses, and information, like a new job opening. They reach deeply into neighbourhoods you would never know. Whereas, strong ties already know all the gossip.
But, weak ties only allow for 'simple contagion'. Only one source is required to give me covid or tell me Team GB's score.
When the behaviour is costly (social cred, etc) or controversial, people may require independent affirmation and reinforcement from multiple sources.
Read 9 tweets
20 Jun 20
This is everyone who tweeted #Nudgestock2020.
A few things to point out. A thread:

View full res: drive.google.com/drive/folders/…
Centrality. People closest to the centre are the most influential. They have the highest reach or they are associated w/ people who do.

Top 10
@OgilvyConsultUK @rorysutherland @Ogilvy @dilipsoman @42Courses @s_tatam @CassSunstein @danariely @peoplepatterns @CGraves
Clusters. Highly interconnected groups.

Shout out to team green: @adamferrier @thebrainybiz @austint @MikeyFox Blue: @NGruen1 @danbenyork Orange: @kaiwright @chiaravara Pink: @bjfogg @primalpoly @lauriesantos @sentientist @profpauldolan Hot pink: @UofT_BEAR @Bong_Bondhu
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(