According to this piece: 1) Greek fire brigade vehicles are old (half of them 30 to 40 yo), and get knocked out with the first fires of the season. 2) the funding requested by forest management agency was 2 to 3 times what they were given. And even that came through
1/x
with delay. 3) the union of forest managers used to be 1200 strong, now it's less than 500, last hires of permanent staff were in 2008! 4) fire services are understaffed by about 4,000 fire-fighters! 5) the average age of the fire-fighters is rather old at over 45 yo (wtf!)
2/x
6) out of 14 canadair fire-fighting aircrafts, 8 are of the older generation with operational restrictions in ambient temperature.
And all of this, 3 whole years after the Mati disaster. We chose to hand out millions after millions € to mainstream media in order to support govt narratives instead of fire prevention.
Yes, it's not the right time for criticism but, oh my god, what have we done.
A govt person has presented this table suggesting the number of fire-fighting aircrafts+helicopters has increased compared to past years. I have to say I spent quite some time in Thursday and Friday on flightradar24 and I couldn't count half that number.
In fact I couldn't even count 20 as far as I remember. Maybe my non-expert eyes couldn't locate them, but this needs to answered in FULL DETAIL. Where was each of these 74 units. There had been almost whole days where only one (1) helicopter was operating in Evia.
Only 1 helicopter dousing the flames of the largest wildfire of the island on record. The people of northern Evia will demand an explanation why they were treated as second class citizens. Why the only plan available seems to have been for the fire to stop at the sea.
Why out of the 74 units that the govt person is explicitly describing as "available" in his graphic, only one was deployed there for such large periods of time. And why so slow in asking for help through the RescEu? Good luck answering these questions to the ppl of northern Evia.
In other cross-confirmed sources the total number of flying fire-fighting units is reported as 69, so that table (few tweets above) is unreliable. 🤷
Anyway, since 2018, there have been a few improvements for which the current govt could and should be given some credit,
These are: 1) the 112 automated messaging platform that communicates evacuation orders with some key info. However, this is just an SMS on phones in an area, and it's mostly useful when the fire advances very fast so someone who has no idea what's happening would get this and
act. In these fires, there was no significant wind and the advance if the fire was well predictable. Also now we have lots of evidence that properties/villages were saved by locals/volunteers that defied the evacuation message. 2) the number of flying fire-fighting units has
increased, regardless of that table which is unreliable. However, this alone doesn't tell us much. The reality on the ground shows that nowhere near that number were actually operational. I hope we see detailed explanation. If we accept that they were all operational, then
the coordination clearly failed. And if we were to accept that they were operational and the coordination was good, then Greece may still need to expand its fleet.
So these two things were certainly in the right direction, but clearly inadequate overall.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There is quite a lot of anecdotal evidence that fire-fighting resources have been allocated in places that are regarded as "priority" leaving other places, incl. villages exposed. Both in cases of the N Evia fire which was concurrent with the Athens fire and on the fire of West
Peloponnese where the archaelogical site of Ancient Olympia has been prioritised. It is very hard to criticise these decisions, especially at this point in time. I hope we can see independent investigations (i.e. not from SKAI TV) on this issue once we are through the crisis.
It's also clear that Greece needs to seriously expand its resources and capabilities (criticisms about govt expenditure priorities are 100% valid). The RescEU program is good but the responses through that cannot be fast enough, when literally every minute counts.
The more you read about the case of the pedophile (now former) director of the Greek national theatre, the more infuriating it gets. Besides the obvious traumas and pain he has caused, there are huge political responsibilities that lie with the current goverment.
This guy was appointed in the post by Culture Minister Lina Mendoni: 1) with no public job post opening or transparent hiring procedures, 2) while there already were rumours about him being abusive against children (!) 3) despite his past record of being fired from
other schools where he was teaching.
Mendoni tried to defend him and: 1) initially denied that he should resign. 2) After he resigned, she kept defending him saying that there is no official accusation filed with the police. 3) After the official accusation came, she tried to
Νήμα 100% βιωματικό για ΕΙΟ.
Κάθε Φεβρουάριο η Ελλάδα οργανώνει το Athens Eurolymp. Για τους Έλληνες αθλητές είναι εξαιρετικά σημαντικό γιατί μαζί με το πανελλήνιο πρωτάθλημα καθορίζει την κατάταξη (ranking list) και πρόκριση για εθνική ομάδα.
Είναι ανοικτό όμως και σε αθλητές από ομοσπονδίες κρατών της Ευρώπης αλλά υπό κανονικές συνθήκες πασχίζει να προσελκύσει αθλητές εκτός Ελλάδας. Συνήθως έρχονται μόνο αθλητές από Βουλγαρία, Τουρκία, Ρουμανία, Ισραήλ, Κύπρο, Ιταλία. Το 2004 όμως ήταν διαφορετική χρονιά,
με τους Ολυμπιακούς της Αθήνας μόνο μερικούς μήνες μακριά. Ήταν μοναδική ευκαιρία για πολλούς πρωταθλητές να δοκιμάσουν τα νερά στα οποία θα αγωνιστούν αργότερα. Το κόστος συμμετοχής ανά αθλητή κανονικά ήταν περίπου Ε80. Εκείνη την χρονιά όμως η αισχρή ΕΙΟ το ανέβασε στα Ε150!
This is a very interesting chart and analysis indeed. The negative correlation is, of course, expected but the scatter is surprisingly huge. The countries in the bottom left are in the spotlight here; the worst of all by far seems to be Greece.>
The authors give two valid points: "Possible explanations include governments’ preference for directing emergency funds to support the rest of the crisis-hit economy and of course the possibility that in some of these countries the intensity of the pandemic was relatively weak.">
In the case of Greece, emergency funds were indeed provided to other sectors, but it was controversial as >E20mln were given to mainstream media who were already, by law, mandated to broadcast public health campaigns for free & media is a sector not terribly affected by WFH etc.>
What a flawed analysis by @nytimes EdBoard:
"An attempt by Germany [to mediate] foundered when Greece announced an energy deal with Egypt that effectively claimed rights to a broad area of the sea, which it did in response to a similar accord between Turkey and Libya." 1/x
In other words, the @nytimes equates the Greece-Egypt martime boundary deal with the blatantly illegal Turkey-GNA deal.
[Article link: nytimes.com/2020/08/30/opi…]
2/x
"... competition for fossil fuels should have given way by now to competition over how to stop using them, especially among countries that have subscribed to the Paris climate agreement."
May we remind @nytimes that Turkey has NOT ratified the Paris Agreement?
3/x