This was meant to be a short rant, but it ended being a thread.
Neither José Antonio nor Francisco Franco; Ramiro Ledesma!
Everyone knows why Francisco Franco was not a Fascist (except spergs and leftists), but there is something not many know in regards to Spanish Fascism, and that is; José Antonio Primo de Rivera was not the face of Spanish Fascism
Throughout the evolution of his writings and his side comments to his close ones, we can definitely understand that this person was nothing else but a larper that was trying to benefit from the Italian movement and its relevance.
Not only did he in many times deny that the Falange was a Fascist movement, but he would also reject Nationalism, hang around bourgeois elements, and admit to using Fascism as nothing else but a Facade from which they could benefit.
It is in his 1936 "Cuaderno de Notas de un Estudiante Europeo", he would state his final thoughts regarding Fascism:
Despite his initial larp and his visit to the 1935 CAUR Fascist conference, he would still trashtalk Fascism behind the doors and play its cards properly in order to get Italian support for the party.
On the other hand, he would engage in open discussions with...
Ramiro Ledesma Ramos, personality that actually supported Nationalism, whereas José Antonio openly opposed Nationalist attitudes and called it the "Individualism of Peoples". His approach at the world would certainly be based in a more Catholic centered politics...
that is also ellaborated on in his late stage writings in which he takes a more Humanitarian approach and fully embraces his rejection of Fascism, claiming that its life span would certainly be short due to their policies...
unless Germany rejected its imperially germanic approach, and tried to unify the people of Europe. Ramiro Ledesma for the other side would actually embrace Fascism and endorse nothing else but the motto of "Everything inside the State".
Ramiro Ledesma is worthy of his own thread, so I'll attach this photo that displays the main differences between him and José Antonio:
Due to these reasons, many Spanish Fascists eventually reject the figure of José Antonio, his initial Facade as a Fascist Leader falls apart once one gets to know the man behind his ideas, and his last thoughts. José Antonio was a Third Positionist, just not a Fascist one.
Rivera would go down as nothing else but a coward that would punch down on former friends such as Ramiro Ledesma, dying on his knees as he realized that he had put his bets on the wrong horse. He deserves no pitty from any Fascist.
The End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
No introduction, no anything, let's get to the point before I give up on life.
We must make two distinctions when dealing with the term "NazBol" as a whole, many people just interpret it as what "Third Position" is, that is, just mixing random...
left and right policies and going around stanning Stalin and the Austrian Painter, or by default, they slander Left leaning Fascists as NazBols. These attitudes obliterate the meaning of the word and the implications of its beliefs by making it a caricature, thus...
As bizarre as this may be, Fascism once had its own "Internationale". You heard right, the Ultranationalistic hateful ideology once had/organized International meetings for Fascists belonging to different Nations.
First of all, we must distinguish between two concepts, that is, the Universal Character of Fascism, and what Universal Fascism represented.
The first one is the one that is used by your day to day Fascist, that is, we hold a Philosophy that is organically...
It would be easy for me to simply jump into the topic with the usual quote of Mussolini where he calls it mostly a feeling. This has been into practice by many Fascists for years, and it usually goes along coping with...
the 1938 Racial Laws, in order to say that Mussolini only held racial views due to German influence. The issue with this type of approach is that it ignores the fact that the Italian leader did make references to the existence of race and its relevance to National Pride.
Thread based on the result of the Survey. Written along @rexie43
Fascist Socialism
Who hasn’t seen the following video?
Although goofy, this video makes a claim with some truth. It being that “Fascists are Socialists with a National Identity”, their interpretation of it leads them to Low IQ takes that explain why Conservatives will always fail, but...
Time for another thread ellaborating on Fascism as an ideology, as well as taking the chance to debunk to one of the main claims of famous Anti-Fascist thinker Umberto Eco.
Fascist Anti-Intellectualism
Online lefty discourse (Breadtubers to be specific) usually goes around quoting and using pseudo-historians and overall biased sources in order to understand Fascism. One of the most well known go to source is the 14 Points of Umberto Eco...
a lame """summary""" of Fascism that engages in intellectual dishonesty, historical misinterpretation, and overall claims that most likely happened on a wet dream of the author. One of his most important claims is that Fascism was an irrational, violent movement...