1) Our leaders often peddle the false narrative that we've only just realised how serious the climate crisis is, and that's why they've been slow to take action until now. Below is a link to an article about a TV documentary about climate change in 1981, which exposes this lie.
2) Here's the link to the article by @LeoHickman on @CarbonBrief. There a many video clips from the documentary, and I would highly recommend watching them.
carbonbrief.org/warming-warnin…
3) The reason I like to highlight what was known when about climate change is to illustrate why the reason our leadership has not taken any action on the climate crisis, is because they don't want to do anything to change business as usual.
4) What I'm saying is that our leadership, our governments, vested interests, the fossil fuel industry, the modern media are gaslighting the public about the climate and ecological crisis, because they're scared of the public demanding action, when they don't want to take action.
5)@GretaThunberg often accurately highlights how the central problem is that the climate crisis is not being treated as a real crisis, because if our governments and the media were treating it as a real crisis, it would dominate the agenda and fill the headlines every day.
6) Therefore, what I'm attempting to do, is to unravel this false narrative our leadership, and vested interests are spinning us about why they've so far failed to take any action to prevent dangerous climate breakdown, as evidenced by all the extreme weather events this year.
7) They've tried to excuse the failure to take action by giving the false impression that we've only recently learned of the seriousness of the climate crisis, and this is why no effective action has yet been taken. This 1981 TV documentary, proves beyond any doubt this is a lie.
8) Remember, our leadership is still not planning to take any serious measures to reduce carbon emissions now, despite the UK minister in charge of COP26, saying we face climate catastrophe unless action is taken.
theguardian.com/environment/20…
9) See my thread about the absurdities and incoherence in what Alok Sharma is saying.
10) Our leadership are still actively supporting the opening up of new fossil fuel reserves. They are still paying massive subsidies to support the fossil fuel industry and to encourage the use of fossil fuels.
forbes.com/sites/davidcar…
11) Instead of taking action now our leaders are making vague promises of reaching Net Zero by 2050. But this is not real Net Zero. This is fake Net Zero achieved through false accounting and magical thinking.
12) Despite having know about how serious the climate crisis was for 40 years or more as this TV documentary from 1981 proves, our governments have failed to act. Why?
13) You see, I'm old enough to remember the oil crises of the 1970s and the action governments took in the 1970s to reduce energy demands. Speed limits on roads were reduced in both the UK and the US.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1970s_ene…
14) In the UK a whole load of other measures were taken to reduce energy demands. It was illegal to heat public buildings over a certain level, and the government advised the public against unnecessary use of energy.
15) What these government measures in the 1970s proved, was that governments were quite capable of reducing energy demands if they wanted to. However, we are in a full on crisis as the extreme weather events prove, and our governments, do nothing. Why?
16) As I keep saying. It is crystal clear that the main priority of our leadership, our governments, is to maintain business as usual. To not alter anything, to not alter the status quo. Why, what is the motivation?
17) The motivation is obvious. We live in deeply unequal societies, where the wealth and expenditure of the very wealthy and powerful rockets ahead of the wealth and power of ordinary people.
18) In other words, a tiny proportion of our societies lead lives of unbelievable, wealth, privilege and status. Measures to address the climate and ecological emergency, would threaten the great privilege of that tiny minority. They are determined to preserve their status.
19) Unfortunately, the wealth and powerful few, control all the levers of power. They own the media, they own politicians. They have the power for massive lobbying if politicians propose any action that might effect them.
20) What I am saying is this is why no action has been taken to address this unravelling crisis, despite it being known about for definite 40-50 years ago. Despite the fact we knew we had to take action then.
undocs.org/en/A/CONF.48/1…
21) This is why they are refusing to take action now, to maintain the privilege and status of a relative handful of people, who maintain control over the levers of power. They are obstructing the necessary action.
threadreaderapp.com/thread/1423607…
22) Some background context. In 1981, there were only 3 TV stations in the UK and TV broadcasts ended around midnight. Actually, I think BBC2 normal broadcasts ended at 10:30pm, so the only other option for viewers was BBC1.
23) Contrast TV and the media in general now, with back then in 1981. Were major news channels such as the BBC reporting on the raging wildfires and extreme weather around the world, and fail to mention the climate crisis at all.
24) What has happened is that the wealthy and the powerful worry that the public may demand action to address the climate and ecological crisis, which may effect their status, so they have got far more controlling of what the public are told about this crisis.
25) What other explanation is there for what is happening?
26) Once again, this is nothing about blame, and everything about effective problem solving. If our leaders are determined not to take action out of self-interest and because their paymasters don't want them to take action, we need to know this.
27) The surest way to stop our leaders from failing to act in the public interest, is to make it known as to why they are failing to take action, so they can be shamed into taking action. They fear the wrath of public opinion. That's why they're so obsessed with controlling it.
@threadreaderapp Please unroll?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen Barlow

Stephen Barlow Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SteB777

9 Aug
1) From the latest @IPCC_CH report. We don't need to know any more. The total focus should be on this.

"Only rapid and drastic reductions in greenhouse gases in this decade can prevent such climate breakdown"
theguardian.com/science/2021/a…
2) Yet no government in the world is even suggesting this (in fact they are opening up new FF reserves). They are all pursuing some fake Net Zero by 2050 framing, that does not involve immediate reductions in GHGs, as the science indicates is necessary.
3) @GretaThunberg has repeatedly highlighted how little of the remaining carbon budget was left to keep below the Paris 1.5C target, and that only drastic action now could keep us within it. She was quoting the @IPCC_CH SR15. But what she said was roundly ignored.
Read 22 tweets
7 Aug
Is there anything that better illustrates the incoherence of our leadership, than Alok Sharma conceding we're on the brink of climate catastrophe, whilst also licensing new gas and oil fields.
theguardian.com/environment/20…
This is madness. Only a rapid winding down of fossil fuel burning will save us from catastrophe. Our leadership has tied itself up in knots with its sophistry about continuing to open up new fossil fuel reserves, whilst supposedly moving towards fake Net Zero.
Fake Net Zero created by false accounting in which individual nations deny responsibility for vast carbon emissions. We cannot solve the climate and ecological crisis, through sophistry and fraud.
Read 14 tweets
6 Aug
1) "People in power stand in our way."

This is the whole reason I keep pointing out the history of the pledges of our leaders to address the climate crisis.
commondreams.org/news/2021/08/0…
2) I'm fed up with the false argument that the failure to address the climate crisis is the fault of the public.

From around the time of the 1992 Rio Earth Summit world leaders started making grandstanding speeches about how they were going to address the climate crisis.
3) The first elected leader who was a climate change denier was Donald Trump in 2016, and he lost the popular vote.

So what stopped world leaders from acting on their pledges to address the climate crisis?
Read 30 tweets
1 Aug
People have been tricked into destroying the natural systems that sustain us, and which are essential for their children to survive in the future, just to make a lot of profit for very rich people benefiting from this unsustainable over-exploitation of the natural world.
However, the idea that this marvellous civilization we have created, is in fact a gigantic intergenerational scam, and that our leaders, both political and business, are not in fact our friends, but con-artists exploiting us, seems too preposterous to contemplate.
However, if our leaders were really our protectors, protecting the public interest, they would have reacted to the climate and ecological crisis, by saying we made a huge error going down this path, we must change direction.
Read 18 tweets
28 Jul
Thanks to the @Guardian for publishing this and I agree with @MichaelEMann @ClimateHuman et al. When I studied climate science as part of my ecology degree, nearly 30 years ago, it seemed obvious to me we had to act on the climate immediately.
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
I could never work out this rationale of putting off taking action on the climate and ecological crisis until some far off point into the future. The science was certain about the nature of the problem we faced, and putting off action was purely procrastination.
The only uncertainties with the climate crisis were in what time frame it would impact us, and the severity. Likewise with the ecological/biodiversity crisis. However, there was no doubt these crises existed and would become more severe as time went on.
Read 15 tweets
28 Jul
1) We need to urgently develop a new simple and clear cut way of defining the climate and ecological crisis, and defining what measures are actually necessary to avert catastrophe. I make this request to all working scientists in this field, and indeed all concerned scientists.
2) Currently we have a serious problem where world leaders are playing a deceitful game of pretending they are trying address the climate and ecological crisis, when neither their acknowledgement of what the crisis is, and nor their measures are at all realistic #MindTheGap.
3) This is a convoluted version of the straw man logical fallacy, in which a dishonest person tries to win an argument, by misrepresenting the argument of their opponent and arguing against the misrepresentation as if that were the issue.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
Read 50 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(