Repeat synonyms enough time, people will believe it is true! Some new suggested filler verbs to describe cognition. 
But if you prefer the brain as a homeostatic system, then these filler verbs should be part of your vocabulary.
A problem though with the homeostatic system is that it is framed in terms of final behavior. It does not describe the generative mechanism. IMHO, the distributed consensus or the game theoretic formulation has greater appeal. deepmind.com/blog/article/E…
Implicit in homeostasis is a process where the multitude of systems in the brain achieve consensus in perhaps optimal in game-theoretic manner. By framing it this way, we at least have a defined process and not an handwavvy groundless verb.
There are many kinds of generative systems. Non-linear dynamical systems, cellular automata, neural networks, genetic algorithms, etc. The question that should be asked is which combination of these can explain the brain.
It's possible that none of them can yet explain the brain and some new kind of generative algorithm has to be discovered. But thinking of the brain as a generative system is the proper way of understanding the brain.
Unfortunately, it is only recently that we have available tools and computational capabilities that allow us to explore generative systems. Previously, we were left to speculate by conjuring up descriptive models.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
