Let's all agree: Elon Musk, Richard Branson and Jeff Bezos are terrible people.
They had some big ideas. Whether you like those ideas or not, whether you like those guys or not, they're putting their ideas into practice.
Contrast this with Bernie Sanders.
1/12
I've been told Sanders has big ideas. Many people like his big ideas. He's been unable to put any of them into practice.
Don't tell me about how "the establishment" doesn't like his ideas. That didn't bother Musk, Bezos or Branson.
2/12
Again, Musk, Bezos and Branson all suck. We're agreed on that. I'm not defending them. I'm saying the excuses for why Sanders is completely ineffectual don't impress me.
Also, Sanders is as "establishment" as it is possible to be.
3/12
He's been in government for at least 30 years. He's never held a job outside of government. He's a multimillionaire and can get on any news channel any time he wants to.
He's so establishment the Democratic Party let him run in their presidential primaries. Twice.
4/12
The Democratic Party lets Sanders run in their Vermont Senate primaries every single time he's up for reelection--even though he then quits and declares he's an "independent" immediately afterwards.
Without the Democratic Party, he'd be an unemployed grifter.
5/12
Sanders relies on the Democratic establishment for his employment, his livelihood, and his access to media and to Senate committee assignments. He's an establishment apparatchik.
With no accomplishments to his name, because he can't put his big ideas into practice.
6/12
It takes building relationships and building coalitions and accepting compromises to get anything done--in politics, in business, even in personal friendships. Sanders can't get anything done.
Not because he's against the "establishment." He =IS= the establishment.
7/12
He can't get anything done, because "being against the establishment" is his schtick. If he worked to form effective relationships with the people he works with it would put the lie to his whole image.
If he worked with people to accomplish things, he'd be "establishment."
8/12
The reason other Democrats don't like him =isn't= because of his "ideas". (Most of his ideas are stolen from other Democrats anyway. He likes our ideas.)
It's because his schtick is to insult and attack Democrats. And because he's abrasive and can't work with anyone.
9/12
And because he's dishonest. He's as establishment as they come, and he pretends to be a "populist" who opposes the establishment--and others in the Democratic Party (and the overwhelming majority of Democratic voters) see right through that farce.
10/12
Musk, Bezos and Branson put their ideas into practice. Sanders can't--which is why his people hate Musk, Bezos and Branson, and try to ridicule their accomplishments.
The Talibern would rather be led by a con man with no accomplishments.
11/12
I did mention, didn't I, that Musk, Bezos and Branson are terrible people, right? I'm not defending them. I'm pointing out that there are people who can accomplish things, and there are people who can't, and the difference is obvious.
12/12
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Scale comparison. On the left is Starship (earlier design--there's now another pair of fins toward the tip). Then Saturn V that brought three people at a time to the Moon. Then Statue of Liberty, then the Space Shuttle.
Starship will eventually seat over a hundred passengers.
Starship is designed to be reusable--not just the orbital part (as with the Shuttle), but even the booster stage, which will land back and the launch pad, be refueled and refurbished, and have another orbital stage set on top.
The orbital part is also, of course, reusable.
The Starship that was assembled yesterday is scheduled for a test flight within the next month or so. The orbital part will spashdown in the Pacific for this test run. The booster stage is meant to land on a SpaceX ocean barge. spacelaunchnow.me/launch/starshi…
I stood in a line today waiting to order fish and chips from a food truck in a parking lot at the local Office Depot. Two older ladies behind me discussed the hazy skies we're seeing from California wildfires.
Here's what we're up against.
1/8
They agreed the massive fires were due to politics.
People in California stupidly want keep things "natural." They should clear the brush out there that causes wildfires. It's not because of global warming. It's because their politics doesn't let them clear brush.
2/8
I stopped listening then.
Put aside that "wanting to keep it natural" couldn't cause this. Since "brush" is natural, it's been there tens of thousands of years. Brush volume hasn't changed. It couldn't suddenly cause unprecedentedly massive fires now.
Self indulgence. A thread full of total and unabased self indulgance.
How it started, how it's going.
Below is a picture I took about 4 years ago, of the spot where I intended then to build my house.
1/4
I worked with an architect to design a house for this spot, one that would fill our needs and also fit the landscape. I took a render from the architect and pasted it onto the view of the land.
2/4
This is what the house looks like today. I think we got pretty close.
I need to take this same picture on another day, when the sky isn't so hazy from faraway wildfires.
The dangers of ethical decisions weigh heavily in the fiction I write.
Here's one I'm likely to include in something I'm working on now:
Imagine you're in a life-and-death struggle. Do you accept dangerously imperfect allies?
1/14
Here's the sort of thing I'm talking about, a situation where the mortal threats are immediate:
Suppose you're in a war. You've taken a mission with 5 other soldiers. Surrounded on all sides, you fear you must keep all your comrades alive, or you have no chance of escape.
2/14
You are almost certain to be overrun and then to die, but your odds increase if more of your friends remain able to fight.
But you learn one of them is a really terrible person. Maybe a murderer or a rapist. Or a racist homophobe. Imagine the worst thing you can imagine.
Armed militias, under orders from then-president Trump, aided by Trump allies in and out of government, attacked the US Capitol on 1/6/21, with the intent of assassinating members of Congress and the VP, to install Trump as dictator.
1/10
Trump was impeached for leading this violent assault on America. Republicans blocked the guilty verdict in the Senate.
A nonpartisan commission was proposed to investigate the insurrection, conforming to all of Republican demands--
2/10
--equal representation, the ability to subpoena witnesses, etc.--and Republicans blocked it in the Senate.
Speaker Pelosi said there =would be= a Special Select Committee in the House to do the investigation. She set up rules that Minority Leader McCarthy agreed to.
As you watch the Olympics, consider this: The worldwide sports industry spends something like $500 billion to $1.25 trillion every year.
What a shameless waste of money.
1/5
Imagine how much poverty could be ended, how much climate change could be stopped, how much wealth inequality could be reduced, if that money was not wasted on the playtime of a few athletes and the beer-guzzling couch potatoes who watch them.
2/5
Just imagine it. We could solve all the world's problems with that money. What a shameful waste. Every year.
The Earth is burning, and a bunch of guys are wasting as much as a trillion dollars a year, just so they can play with their balls.
3/5