This week, and maybe next week, elected officials and the news media will be paying more attention to the #ClimateCrisis than they usually do.

Let's make this time count!

1/n
Use this tool to call your Senators and tell them you want them to pass transformative climate policy in order to win your vote. It's easy and very satisfying! And it will help.

call4climate.com/more

2/n
Here is contact information for the prime-time network news programs. Reach out to them and tell them you want more climate coverage! Make some noise!

static1.squarespace.com/static/5b71db1…

3/n
And, of course, this week and next week are excellent weeks to bring up the #ClimateCrisis with your friends, family, coworkers, acquaintances, etc.

Don't know what to say? See the next tweet...

4/n
"Did you hear about that UN report? [If no, briefly summarize.] We've got to make our government lead the transition to clean energy so we can halt global warming."

If they don't say anything back, ok that's fine. But if they start talking then listen...

5/n
8 out of 10 times the person I'm talking to will say some version of "we are so fucked."

I've found that the only way to shift them from despair to determination is to validate the despair first:

"Yes it's terrifying and overwhelming. I'm with you on that."

Then...

6/n
Then remind them that the global heating causing climate chaos WILL stop when we stop emitting greenhouse gases.

Then say "every tenth of a degree matters to the lives of millions of people."

Then...

7/n
Say "And you can help!" Then text them or wrote down and hand them the number with which they can call their Senators.

202-318-1885

Voilà. And rinse, repeat.

8/n
The next weeks are a time when a window of possibility will open. Good to go into it with a plan.

Stay strong, friends! 💚

#EndClimateSilence

/fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Genevieve Guenther

Dr. Genevieve Guenther Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DoctorVive

9 Aug
I am deeply frustrated that the @IPCC_CH is calling for "reductions" in CO2 emissions rather than what is required: the virtual elimination of CO2 emissions in the next decades.

I mean, virtual elimination of emissions is what "reaching net-zero CO2 emissions" means!

1/2
"Reductions" is a weak word that suggests only action on the margins, like losing enough weight to tighten your belt by one hole, or something.

ACTION ON THE MARGINS IS NOT WHAT IS REQUIRED

1.5/2
What political struggle was lost to give us the mixed message that we need to both "reduce" emissions and "reach net zero emissions"?

I feel like I'm in one of those nightmares where you scream at the top of your lungs, but don't make even the smallest sound.

2/2
Read 5 tweets
12 Jul
Here are things NOT mentioned in this @mattyglesias post scolding the climate left for not understanding American political dynamics:

*mitigation
*decarbonization
*a clean electricity standard
*oil & gas lobbying
*how politicians produce the conditions to pass their agenda

🧵
Also not mentioned: the limit outlined by the @IPCC_CH in SR 1.5.

9 years (at this point) to halve emissions & less than 30 to zero them out entirely in order to have even a 2/3s chance to halt warming under 2C, if we also deploy global-scale negative emissions afterwards.

2/
If you're going to position yourself as the voice of clear-eyed realism, you really need to account for the reality of physics in your analysis.

3/
Read 14 tweets
17 Feb
OMG it turns out that at his CNN town hall last night, @JoeBiden didn't tie what's happening in Texas to climate change or to his plans to decarbonize the grid.

@TheDemocrats are STILL making the same messaging mistake. They are scared to connect disasters to climate!

THREAD
I argued *three years ago*, after Hurricane Harvey, that the Dems had been essentially bullied by the right into not talking about climate while people were actually suffering and (sociology suggests) most receptive to climate messages.

medium.com/@DoctorVive/po…
This fear and weakness is part and parcel of the Dem's reluctance to discuss climate policy as a political fight with clear stakes and clear antagonists. But are the Repubs reluctant to do this?? Of course not! They say nothing without demonizing their opponents.
Read 5 tweets
17 Feb
I usually love @EENewsUpdates, but this story on the politics of the Texas blackouts is garbage.

We did not see "partisan arguments" about whether to blame renewables or fossil fuels.

We saw GOP LIES blaming wind power and reality-based FACT CHECKS correcting the record.
And this paragraph's false equivalence makes my head spin.

People's criticism of Texas Repubs is not the same as these Repub's criticism of CA Dems.

Repubs are being criticized for lies and hypocrisy. Dems were being criticized for *supporting renewable energy*.
And, finally, it wasn't "some" conservative groups who attempted to use the grid failure to scare people away from climate action. It was the *entire* right-wing spin machine, from the Texas Public Policy Foundation to Fox News, who LIED about the blackouts to en masse.
Read 6 tweets
16 Jan
Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is very much in the news right now, so I think it's time to review what the @IPCC_CH says about CDR in SR 1.5.

First: they say that CDR "deployed at scale" is speculative or "unproven"and relying on it to halt warming at 1.5C is a "major risk."👇

🧵
You'll often hear energy experts and the people who listen to them say that "we need CDR," as if this were a scientific fact about the carbon system or a level of emissions to which we are already locked in.

This is not true.

2/n
If we halted all GHG pollution within the next year or two, say, we would not need CDR to halt warming at 1.5C.

3/n
Read 15 tweets
21 Dec 20
Now that @JoeBiden has made #ClimateAction his priority, the political press is going to spend the next few months asking his administration "tough questions" along two separate, quasi-denialist lines.

Let's take a look...

[thread]
First, they're going ask how his climate plan will make life tougher for "ordinary Americans." They're going to ask whether families are going to be forced to "sacrifice"—or they're going to ask what "enforcement mechanisms" the administration is going to put in place.

2/n
These sorts of questions obviously pick up on the right-wing talking point that Democrats want to outlaw hamburgers and forbid you from flying to see Grandma for the holidays.

3/n
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(