New season VAR changes thread No. 1:
OFFSIDE REVAMP

- The key differences & how it works
- Why it won't be as quick as Euro 2020
- How it will cut the number of disallowed goals
- Why there will still be "marginal" disallowed goals
For the past two seasons, the Premier League has calculated offside to the millimetre.

But the technology, and how it's applied, isn't capable of making an accurate decision to the millimetre.

Now, the PL will adopt the methodology brought in by UEFA last season (UCL, Euros).
Last season, 1mm lines were used to make all decisions.

The TV broadcast lines gave viewers the final image, but the decision was actually made off narrower lines.

Here you see the black, 1mm attacking line being placed. (yellow is finalised defensive line).
So, what's different? Rather than the decision being made by 1mm lines you can't see, it uses TV lines which you CAN see.

No player will be offside unless there's a clear result.

Ergo, if the two lines touch, it's onside. One green line shown rather than a mash of red & blue.
"On marginal offside, we've now effectively re-introduced the benefit of the doubt to the attacking player," Mike Riley said.

"So it's the toe nails, the noses of the players who are offside; they might have been offside last season but next season they won't be."
The Premier League won't confirm the exact margin of error, but I'm told the TV line gives 5cm to the attacker for that "benefit of the doubt".

It might not seem like much, but it would have saved 19 goal situations last season. Again, I can't get a confirmed list of the 19.
VAR disallowed 32 goals for offside last season, but the 19 won't all come from this.

That's because goals were ruled out for offside on the pitch, which were confirmed as marginally offside by the VAR. They are not included in the 32.

Still, it will be a marked reduction.
It won't be as slick as Euro 2020, which had an assistant as a dedicated offside VAR in every game. It's impossible for any league to copy this.

But the Premier League method (as with the UCL) is exactly the same as at Euro 2020, except for the dedicated offside VAR.
The VAR process itself doesn't change at all.

The lines are still drawn, points on players are still potted. There's now just a 5cm margin of error to reduce the marginal offside calls.

It will still take the same amount of time, an average of 34 seconds last season.
An important change is the Premier League will stop showing the decision-making process. You won't see the lines drawn.

Instead, the final result will be provided to the broadcaster in the same timescale as before - it's then up to the broadcaster when it's shown.
This is far superior, as it stops fans, media and rights-holders sharing incomplete, and incorrect, images - which no one can understand.

It only added to the VARs problems and perception.

There's no conspiracy to hide here, it's just a better system - as shown in the Euros.
It's important to note that this ISN'T the Dutch system, which sticks with the linesman's decision if it's close (lines touch).

If it's close, then it's a goal.

It doesn't matter if the assistant flagged and it's close, benefit of the doubt still goes to the attacker.
So, let's take a look at some goals given offside last season, which would probably count under the new interpretation.

- Vardy offside for Barnes goal
- Henderson goal ruled out for offside against Mane
- Salah goal vs. Brighton
- Bamford goal vs. Palace
Other goals/incidents that would likely stand this season:

- Salah vs. Sheffield United
- Willian Jose goal disallowed for Wolves vs. Fulham
- Arsenal penalty cancelled for offside
- Laporte goal disallowed vs. Wolves
Worth noting that Virgil van Dijk would have been onside against Everton.

That would have definitely resulted in a penalty for Liverpool, and as such the red card for Jordan Pickford would not have been missed as a full pitchside review would have been required.
The issue, of course, is this just moves the point at which a player becomes offside in the VAR world.

There will still be marginal decisions, just at a new point. At least now there will be a clear image.

Here's two close ones from Euro 2020, which you will see in the PL.
Even under the new system, there are still decisions which last season produced a clear result which fans refused to accept.

These caused disbelief among Leeds fans, but they will still be disallowed this coming season (most were actually flagged by the assistant).
Other marginal decisions which would still be disallowed under the new system:

- Gabriel Jesus for GK own goal vs. Burnley
- Ollie Watkins vs. West Ham
- Chilwell for Chelsea's FA Cup final goal
- Watkins vs. WBA
One final change is more flexibility for an assistant with the delayed flag on a very clear offside.

It means we should no longer see the flag stay down when an attacker is yards off.

It obviously has possible pitfalls, but it should be less infuriating for players and fans.
I'll do two other threads this week.

One on the new interpretation of soft fouls, and another on how handball will be judged this season.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dale Johnson

Dale Johnson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DaleJohnsonESPN

10 Aug
New season VAR / refereeing changes thread No. 2:
SOFT FREE-KICKS AND PENALTIES

- What's a "soft" free-kick / penalty
- Ethos behind it
- Influence of Euro 2020
- Examples of so-called "soft" penalties
- Issues with implementation / VAR
- Unlikely to be a smooth ride
The change comes after meetings between PGMOL and clubs, players, managers, coaches and the Football Supporters' Association.

Also included a survey among fans to find out how they envisage games being refereed.

This, along with learnings from Euro 2020, shaped the thinking.
Mike Riley said he wants to "allow Premier League games to flow and that means the refereeing team, both as referee and as VAR, don't intervene for the trivial offences.

"Let's create a free-flowing game, where the threshold is slightly higher than it was last season."
Read 33 tweets
13 Jul
Euro 2020 is done and dusted, which is the proper time for a VAR thread to assess how it was operated.

Even so, you have to remember Euro 2020 is basically just 5 rounds of domestic league action (51 games).

For that reason, you can only really make summary judgements.
1. The refereeing was so much better

It certainly was, though of course it should be at a major tournament that is officiated by all the best referees from across Europe.

But this isn't only down to the referees, it's also down to head of refs, Roberto Rossetti.
While the Laws of the Game set the framework, the actual application of the laws still comes down to guidelines issued.

It's clear Rossetti's refereeing guidelines for Euro 2020 were to allow games to flow, that refs should ignore players trying to "win" decisions.
Read 23 tweets
17 May
It's Monday VAR thread time, which has turned out to be more detailed than I originally planned.

- West Brom vs. Liverpool
- Chelsea vs. Leicester

Wasn't much else to discuss across the weekend, really...
Starting with the free kick Mike Dean gave to Liverpool, which led indirectly to Mo Salah's goal. Only the referee can answer this for you.

The referee is part of the game so it shouldn't be a free kick, and the ball didn't hit him so it shouldn't be a dropped ball. 🤷‍♂️
Let's dissect the disallowed West Brom goal, which would have given them a 2-1 lead.

Obviously, some see this as controversial. And giving offside against a player who doesn't play the ball is, by its nature, a subjective aspect of the offside law.

Read 19 tweets
26 Apr
It's your Monday VAR thread, looking at:

- Fabian Balbuena red card
- Callum Wilson handball (and reference to Luke Shaw)
- Arsenal penalty
- The little-known subjective element of offside

As usual, don't shoot the messenger.
Let's start with Fabian Balbuena, it's just a really VAR intervention.

Referee Chris Kavanagh isn't blameless of course, but as I said with the Tomas Soucek red card vs. Fulham it's the VAR, Peter Bankes, who is the gatekeeper.

I've talked several times about referees lacking confidence as VARs, almost second guessing against their own vast experience and judgement.

This seemed the case here, with the VAR watching the incident so many times he convinced himself something was there that wasn't.
Read 25 tweets
23 Apr
Arsenal win this game with a different VAR. And that's the problem with the current offside process, that many don't realise.

There's a key subjective element that means a different VAR doesn't draw the lines on the penalty (or on Everton's goal) because it's too close.
The case for the prosecution. Both these offside decisions were done by the same VAR.

They would not happen with every VAR. ImageImage
This is why the upcoming semi-automated offside is going to be so, so, so crucial.

It will remove all the subjectivity of the VAR plotting points on players. And it will transform the fan experience.

espn.co.uk/football/blog-…
Read 4 tweets
20 Apr
So the Premier League 14 meet today to discuss the Six Saboteurs and the European #SuperLeague.

What happens is going to be really important.

The Premier League needs the Six Saboteurs.
The Six Saboteurs need the Premier League.
The ESL would break the Premier League. 1/9
It's reported that as part of the JP Morgan financing package, clubs must continue playing domestic football.

So the Six Saboteurs will fight tooth and nail through all avenues to make sure they are not banned. 2/9
Gianni Infantino at the UEFA Congress on the ESL clubs:

"If some elect to go their own way then they must live with the consequences of their choice, they are responsible for their choice - concretely this means, either you are in, or you are out." 3/9
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(