2/ Abbott and states likely can do some things, but just not the E.O. I also agree w/ points re fed government failing. But bottom line, as a matter of constitutional law, thefederalist.com/2021/08/04/tex…
3/ he is wrong. Suprmacy Clause preempts THIS E.O. It's not even a close question. And you'll note, other than conclusory statements, there is no discussion of legal standards or analysis in his piece. Rather than fight over this, which court has already stayed, lets:
4/ figure out what Texas can do? Build their own wall? Have their own law enforcement prevent breaches of border? Mandate quarantines & sanction those violating quarantines or aiding? Biden has failed Americans. I agree we need more than publicity of this fact and to extent
5/5 I failed to make that point clearly, I am now. On the E.O., the best we can get is publicity. But there are other options. Let's find those.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Trikafta mini-update: DS has been on Trikafta for just about 2 months. Before his lungs have been so healthy (thank you God), he hasn't noticed any real changes. We'll know more when he does his annual Xray if the minimal lung inflamation has decreased & re nasal polyps & 1
2/ whether he still colonizes staph, which he has since 2 weeks old. BUT the huge yippee is his GI issues which have always been the worst--worst his CF doctor has seen. Since he was ~1 year horrible problems, daily
3/ stomach pain w/ me basically rocking him all day other than meals & treatments, one obstruction hospitalization. Things stable for about 4 years after we found solution which requires 6 full doses of Miralax per day, plus 2 shots of milk of mag per day & senna ~3 per week.
I still haven't gotten any clarification and don't see a correction from either @CNN or @brikeilarcnn. Did some number crunching. Here's another interesting graph.
3/ I'm happy to share my calculations if anyone wants to double check them, as I don't quite have the staff or budget of say @CNN or @brikeilarcnn to double check to make sure I don't make a mistake, say by
So, in reading some of briefing in Dobbs, something strikes me. The Court will have to confront actual science this time that establishes human life already exists pre-viability. Court can lie, pretend it doesn't matter to "avoid question," or accept reality. 1/
2/ If Court does #3, challenge for Court will be to access (invent) constitutional principle re when state can allow or disallow destruction of human life. But that is a moral or philosophical question that justices neither can nor should answer.
3/ And if Court attempts to "punt," saying since different moral/philosophical beliefs on this question so we must defer to moms' view, the Court IS deciding what moral/philosophical position wins.
I'm digging more into impact of Biden Administration's failure to fully enforce Title 42 rule on border and this is an amazing tidbit. (March Order is 2020 March order by Trump Administration precluding entry/mandating quick removal.).
2/ But while Biden Administration claims Title 42 is necessary for public health reasons, it is doing its utmost to not use the authority to remove: